Should You Buy More Stocks?

Recs

36

Exactly how many stocks should you own?  A dozen? 50?

How about 150?

Living the philosophy
Anurag Gupta, an "average Joe" retail investor like you and me, owns close to 150 holdings. He's the poster child for a diversified portfolio.

We're pro-diversification around here. In fact, Fool co-founder Tom Gardner has said that "[Diversification] compels investors to regularly add money and to not worry so much about where the overall market is." And, as Tom points out, "A diversified portfolio spreads the risk."

That's a nice combo.

Mr. Diversification himself
Make no mistake, though: Gupta doesn't diversify for diversity's sake. He's outperformed the broad market with this strategy, and he's had fun doing it.

Gupta started investing about six years ago, not long after the dot-com bust and the Enron scandal. His first stocks included FedEx (NYSE: FDX) and Infosys (Nasdaq: INFY), which he still holds today. From the outset, Gupta knew that a well-balanced portfolio would be important to his long-term success, but he didn't set out thinking he'd own more than a hundred equities.

Is he overly diversified? Master investor Shelby Davis held a portfolio with more than 1,000 holdings. After a lifetime of investing, he'd turned a $50,000 account into more than $900 million. As Mr. Davis famously said, "My father taught me to ask how much you can lose before you even dream about how much you might make."

Gupta uses his portfolio diversification strategy in much the same way: to manage and reduce his risks.

Although there's a concentrated focus on risk management, Gupta told me that his returns haven't suffered for it. (And, as you'll see later, he keeps a lid on excess trading costs.)

How he does it
His investing strategy is quite simple: He keeps his bets small, doesn't break the bank on any one stock, and remains patient in his overall portfolio. Typically, Gupta keeps new positions to about 0.25% of his entire portfolio.

That's not to say every stock has that weight. His largest holding is the extremely well-run conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B). (We can all stand to splurge a little on a company with credentials like that!)

As Gupta shows, you don't have to be a millionaire to own a broad portfolio. And you most certainly don't have to spend big to win big.

His initial stock purchases are usually between $150 and $500. He'll put varying levels of cash in differing stocks -- more in dividend plays than in small caps, for example. (Here's a good example of proper diversification.)

How can he do that without getting eaten alive by trading costs? Simple. He's a discount shopper.

As Gupta told me, "Low-commission trading to enable $300-size purchases is here to stay." Heck, we may be moving closer to no-commission trading. Because Gupta has multiple accounts with Zecco, he gets 240 commission-free trades a year. The increased availability of zero- and low-commission trading sites makes it possible to purchase a large number of stocks in small lots without stunting your portfolio's growth. If you don't have zero-commission trading, a good rule of thumb is to keep stock commissions to less than 2% of your buy price.

What's he eyeing today?
Gupta has been buying shares of Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) in recent months, and he's looking at a few companies on his watch list, including smaller financial-related companies American Capital (Nasdaq: ACAS) and MVC Capital (NYSE: MVC). He's also watching some emerging markets; he's high on Melco Crown Entertainment (Nasdaq: MPEL), a casino in Macau, because he sees sound management and a solid business plan with superior growth opportunities.

He generally chooses stocks that interest him. That's a good rule to live by. You'll not only likely stay within your circle of competence, but you'll also be able to follow the business and pick up on valuable trends.

That's not to say you should buy only stocks you like. Gupta is the first to warn against falling in love with a stock … and becoming biased in your analysis of it.

The key takeaways
Not every investor should own more than 100 stocks. Not every investor will want to, either. But Gupta's diligent diversification strategy has a couple of lessons for us oddlot retail investors:

  • No stock picker is perfect. Peter Lynch once said that in his line of work, if you were right six times out of 10 times, you'd be pretty good. I hate to break the news, but we're likely no Peter Lynch. A diversified portfolio will pad your portfolio against the inevitable.
  • Keeping trading costs low is extremely important -- the less money you give to a brokerage, the more you'll allow to compound over the years in your stock holdings.

The Foolish bottom line
Finally, Gupta has a blast investing in the market. This is serious business, but it can be a lot of fun.

"Having fun" is so important that Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner made it one of their seven core principles at Motley Fool Stock Advisor. (Another of their other core tenets is "Diversify, diversify, diversify.")

Recommending and holding a wide variety of companies has worked out well at Stock Advisor. Since inception in 2002, David and Tom's picks are beating the market average by more than 40 percentage points. You can check out all their recommendations and research for free with a 30-day trial -- just click here to learn more.

Hilary Schronce does not own shares of any company listed. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. FedEx, Apple, and Berkshire are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations; Berkshire is also an Inside Value pick. Melco is a Global Gains selection. American Capital is an Income Investor pick. MVC Capital is a Hidden Gems recommendation. Berkshire is also an Inside Value selection. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2008, at 7:00 AM, andlonmia wrote:

    There have been several studies that conclude that the optimal portfolio is about 20 holdings, because the marginal diversification tends to be offset by the additional costs. And I mean not only transaction costs: I know how much time I spend understanding each stock in my portfolio. I couldn't possibly do the same with five times more companies to analyze.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2008, at 8:44 AM, pondee619 wrote:

    How can someone, who has a day job, possibly keep adequate track of 150 holdings? Do you just buy them and ignore them? What happens to research, monitoring, staying current with your holdings? Do you read the reports of all compainies? Listen to their earnings calls? How do you prevent being blindsided by an event that would have been apparent with proper diligence? How do you excersise due dilegence over a portfolio of 150 companies. Please someone tell me.

    Or is Mr. Gupta employing buy and ignore, his portfolio nothing more than a market basket? By how much has he "outperformed the broad market"? I missed that point.

    Thanks:

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2008, at 11:52 AM, wpr101 wrote:

    Who the heck is Gutpa and why should I care?

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2008, at 12:49 PM, DoctorWily wrote:

    anyone know how to get 240 free trades a year? i have a few accounts at zecco and get 10 trades a month, 10 x 12 = 120 a year among all accounts. anyone know something i don't?

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2008, at 9:07 AM, KWT8011 wrote:

    you can have an IRA and a taxable account at Zecco. 2x10x12 = 240

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2008, at 9:09 AM, KWT8011 wrote:

    PS, 150 holdings? Wouldn't he have a fair amount of overlap? And wouldn't you oversaturate your portfolio to point of owning an index fund or two might get the same results?

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2008, at 1:50 PM, BaratadiBurracha wrote:

    well... i recognized some of the companies he's investing in, and i see the reason why he's chosen them and also the same reason why he can "over"diversify. Someone else is doing his due diligence, i cannot guess what his annual avg has been, and am very curious what the result is, could we have an update?

    Index funds...hmmm, expense ratio, he doesnt pick the underlying companies neither their weight in his portfolio.

    zecco.com + Fool.com + Patience = a very wise man.

    I started my portfolio with only 3k but i believe the amount i spent on the Fools' premium services were ABSOLUTELY worth it, my gains agree= 23% avgd yr!! (counting this horrendous purchasing opport... er... cough...recession we are currently facing!!)

    =D

    Foolishly, J

  • Report this Comment On August 03, 2008, at 10:52 AM, JOEZAPP wrote:

    150 holdings in this market? i cant see how you can keep a average of 50%. he must have help, or he needs help. i have 7 holdings, and a watch basket of 20 holdings. in the basket i cant keep a 50% average. my 7 real holdings are doing well lately wind and solar. trn,oc,ottr, jaso i buy and sell jaso try charting jaso, buy point i use is $14 to $15 buy sell between $19 to $23 its working for me..patiance.... cpst is working to. cheep stock invested $1000@ $2.64, was up a liitle over $4, i shoulda woulda. i will take profit at $4 and it will go there shortly

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2008, at 11:45 PM, none0such wrote:

    This is classic alpha - a managed portfolio - vs. beta - an indexed portfolio. Mr. Gupta is simply paying others to advise him what to buy. In a sense he is manually constructing his own index fund. The time he spends studying stocks and deciding which stocks to buy is minimal; his rules for allocating funds to re-recommendations and new recommendations might allow for some alpha to shine but this too, I am sure, is standardized by him. This investing style is fine but the draw back is that you are not putting 100% of your money in companies that don't suck, not that that is ever really possible. Also you can't swing hard at the big ones. The immediate plus is less time spent investing and less emotion involved while making very good returns.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 696548, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 11:24:44 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
ACAS $3.06 Up +0.08 +2.68%
American Capital,… CAPS Rating: ****
FDX $81.78 Down -0.70 -0.85%
FedEx Corp CAPS Rating: ***
MVC $9.96 Up +0.23 +2.36%
MVC Capital, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
INFY $51.23 Up +0.28 +0.55%
Infosys Technologi… CAPS Rating: ****
BRK-B $3447.00 Down -3.00 -0.09%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
AAPL $199.92 Down -0.59 -0.29%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
MPEL $4.40 Up +0.11 +2.56%
Melco Crown Entert… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Cost of goods sold: The cost of goods sold, or COGS, is the cost of the inventory or services that was sold.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!