This Is How Sirius Can Quadruple

There's an easy way for Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) to see its penny-stock price jump fourfold overnight -- but investors shouldn't care, because it would be a zero-sum game.

I'm talking, of course, about reverse stock splits. These aren't the more conventional stock splits you typically see. Under the more common scenario, a stock with a high share price will declare a split to get its price back down into a shareholder-attractive range. For instance, a company with its stock at $90 may go for a 3-for-1 stock split, where investors receive two additional shares for every one they own. The stock price drops to $30 to reflect the move.

Reverse splits work the other way around. Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq: JAVA  ) got tired of trading in the single digits, so it executed a 1-for-4 reverse split last year. The stock price quadrupled overnight, while shareholders wound up with a quarter of the number of shares they once owned. It all adds up to the same thing in the end, but sometimes companies need a psychological boost.

I've got a splitting headache
Prolific reverse splits are rare. Usually it's desperate penny stocks shifting into reverse. Struggling online apparel retailer Bluefly (Nasdaq: BFLY  ) went this route in April. With its stock at $0.46 a share, the company declared a 1-for-10 reverse split. The move was good enough to inflate the stock to nearly $5 after the move. However, a reverse split is no remedy for what slammed a stock in the first place. Bluefly has quickly fallen down to the $3 mark.

The list of companies swallowing down hard and resorting to reverse splits is loaded with companies that fade away. It's not a pretty lineup. Occasionally, though, you have a big winner like Priceline.com (Nasdaq: PCLN  ) . The top-performing travel portal hit a bit of turbulence in the aftermath of the dot-com bubble. It opted for a 1-for-6 reverse stock split five years ago. It may have seemed desperate at the time, but shares of Priceline have gone on to appreciate nearly fivefold since then.

Brightpoint (Nasdaq: CELL  ) is another success story. It went for a 1-for-7 reverse split six years ago. The company has done so well since that humbling move that it has had the luxury of issuing five of the more conventional forward stock splits since the 2002 backtrack.

Sun Microsystems isn't so lucky. The stock has shed half of its value since last November's reverse split. It joins JDS Uniphase (Nasdaq: JDSU  ) -- a falling star even after completing a 1-for-8 reverse split two years ago -- as big stocks that have failed to make the most of Wall Street's second chance.

It's different this time
Sirius doesn't really have the luxury of creeping back into double digits organically. It's a $5 billion company after absorbing XM. It would need to be valued as a $35 billion company to find its way back into the double digits, and possibly higher if Sirius continues to dilute its shares.

Let's be honest. I'm a satellite-radio bull, and I can tell you: That’s just not going to happen anytime soon. That would be more than 10 times what the combined companies ring up in revenue this year, with profitability still a blur.

I believe that Sirius XM is bottoming out right now, but with its stock price hanging out in Mickey D’s Value Menu territory, all it will do is attract speculators. Even if it would mean turning every single share into a quarter of a share, a 1-for-4 stock split is almost necessary right now. In fact, a more aggressive 1-for-8 reverse split may be even better.

It's a zero-sum game for investors, but Sirius XM also needs to appeal to on-air talent, partners, and advertisers, groups that are typically market neophytes. Howard Stern was wooed by a cash and stock compensation package. General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) was both a partner and investor in XM. It isn't easy to recruit talent and partners -- or win over new sponsorships -- when your stock is trading for a buck and change. People begin to doubt your viability.

A reverse split for Sirius wouldn't just be a psychological move for existing investors. It would also be a math trick to further its agenda elsewhere.

It will probably happen. It's just a matter of when and how severe the reverse will be. My advice to Sirius is to rip the Band-Aid off quickly. There are plenty of reasons to get excited about the future of Sirius XM. Let's just hope it doesn't blow the present.

Reverse the clock to revisit these related stories:

Priceline is an active recommendation for Stock Advisor subscribers. Learn more about the stock -- without having to split in any direction -- with a free 30-day trial subscription.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz knows that you can't turn back time, but you can take back shares outstanding. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (9) | Recommend This Article (13)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Matt8265 wrote:

    Yeah .... That would be a great idea. Let's do a 4:1 and then watch this POS go back to 1.75 again.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2008, at 3:27 PM, TMFBreakerRick wrote:

    Matt, yes, splits can backfire. But if it goes back to $1.75 after a 1-for-4 reverse split, then it probably would have gone down to $0.44 a share on its own.

    The key is that certain investors and institutions won't touch a stock with a penny stock price. Sirius will obviously have to turn itself around internally, but it's going to need some investor support from the outside too.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2008, at 8:31 AM, MikeRehling wrote:

    I don't see a split happening, and Mel did not really give it any credence either. This is really a pretty lame article. It is based on something that is not going to happen. Why talk about what isn't there?

  • Report this Comment On August 02, 2008, at 2:39 AM, momus2 wrote:

    > "but sometimes companies need a psychological boost."

    Not even funny. A reverse stock split is a psychological downer, not a booster. It has been shown most of the times with very few exceptions.

    Sun (JAVA) btw is now back to it's one digit. Except it's now worth 4 times less...

    Would you suggest another reverse split gimmick?...

  • Report this Comment On August 03, 2008, at 2:20 PM, NewMFool wrote:

    RE: "Brightpoint (Nasdaq: CELL) is another success story. It went for a 1-for-7 reverse split six years ago..... the luxury of issuing five of the more conventional....."

    Theres no mention of the "conventional" splits that they did within the six years prior to the "reverse". With their price slipping (again).... I'm expecting another "reverse".

    They doing too much "manipulating?

  • Report this Comment On September 23, 2008, at 7:24 PM, bodfishmike wrote:

    I just sold all my SIRI at the current bottom. This company is so diluted, it will be impossible for it to turn a nickel. It's headed for Chapter 11.

    Any management that issues 3.2 BILLION shares before making a dime should be flipping burgers.

    Reverse split? Don't make me laugh.

  • Report this Comment On November 26, 2008, at 2:33 AM, sharkmanny wrote:

    Ford, GM, et al are in the single digits. Are they going to do a reverse split too?????

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2009, at 5:16 PM, BCkjn wrote:

    Rick,

    You spoke of being a satelite radio bull. I was until SIRI told me they were raising the rates. What is being added to the lineup I asked customer service. Oh nothing just time to increase your discounted rate (that I have had for 3 years plus and no on told me back then it was discounted).

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2009, at 5:18 PM, BCkjn wrote:

    I should have added I canceled at the end of this pay cycle.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 695935, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/28/2014 6:22:20 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement