Dangerous Fashion Stocks

Recs

8

Are some of the struggling women's retailers' getting their businesses back on track? Let's take a look at three that reported their quarterly results last week: Talbots (NYSE: TLB), Chico's (NYSE: CHS), and Coldwater Creek (Nasdaq: CWTR), none of which has earned a bullish five-star rating in our Motley Fool CAPS community intelligence database.

Company

CAPS rating

Quarterly profit

Sales

Impact on price

Talbots

*

N/A

(7.7%)

33%

Chico's

***

(82.7%)

(7.1%)

2.2%

Coldwater Creek

***

(64.4%)

(4.8%)

7.9%

Gosh, not a positive increase in the house -- other than some arguably goofy moves on the part of the stocks themselves.

Promises, promises at Talbots
As usual, Talbots takes the prize for "reality disconnect" over the course of the past year or so, its stock plunging, soaring, plunging, soaring -- which is why I dubbed it "one heck of a what the …?" stock awhile back (mostly because of its tendency to soar). Talbots' shares skyrocketed on its quarterly results, despite the sad decrease in net sales as well as the fact that its quarterly net loss just about doubled on a year-over-year basis.

Apparently, investors were excited about Talbots' annual forecast, though. As it turns out, closing its men's and kids' concepts will be cheaper than previously expected. Talbots expects earnings of $0.15 to $0.25 per share for fiscal 2008. Sure, that's a far cry better than the mind-boggling loss of $3.56 per share it recorded for fiscal 2007.

Still, though, this is a company that has had difficulties luring customers for quite some time now, has a difficult competitive landscape to contend with, and also faces an overall weak consumer (and I've long believed the mature female shopper is more likely to pull in her wallet when times are tough). I still think this stock is more of a nonsensical trade than a good long-term investment, because I still see no compelling signs that the company is getting its act together when it comes to its actual business.

Apparently, the Motley Fool CAPS community agrees, since Talbots has a sad one-star rating. As I've pointed out about long-struggling Gap (NYSE: GPS), cost-cutting is nice, and inventory control is helpful, but these stocks are still risky as long as they're not getting far more customers back in the door (without being forced to promise major super sales). This retailer still needs to accomplish a lot to look like a compelling idea to me.

Turning the other Chico's
I haven't felt too terribly optimistic about Chico's for quite some time either. (The CAPS community isn't entirely bearish; the stock has a middle-of-the-road three-star rating.)

Granted, I found some reason to feel a little bit more optimistic about Chico's last week, having done a little impromptu retail bag checking. I noticed at a nearby shopping venue that shoppers carrying Chico's shopping bags far surpassed those of rival and neighbor Talbots, but Chico's quarterly tidings certainly didn't give too many bullish indications.

Both net income and sales decreased, and same-store sales fell an agonizing 15.9% in the quarter. So far in August, Chico's said, its consolidated comps were running at negative 10.7%, as of its press release.

Still, Chico's does have something Talbots doesn't have (other than Debbie Phelps), and that's a clean balance sheet, with $278 million in cash and equivalents and no debt.

Tepid Coldwater
Coldwater Creek was a hot stock once (and like Chico's, has held onto a three-star rating in CAPS), but it has been a lot colder here lately. Its latest quarter delivered more of the same, even though investors seemed to focus on its "better-than-expected" earnings of $0.03 per share.

Still, sales were lethargic in the quarter, and its same-store sales also dropped a formidable 13.7%, hardly seeming to signal a concrete turnaround.

Coldwater Creek also took a non-cash impairment charge of $0.01 per share in the quarter, related to its ancillary concept, The Spa. So much for hopes that The Spa would prove to be a secondary growth vehicle (and the idea that it will pick up steam seems even more risky in a down economy).

Fortunately, though, like Chico's, Coldwater Creek doesn't have any liquidity problems to speak of, with $89.2 million in cash and no borrowings under its credit facility.

Caveat emptor
For all three of these stocks, it looks to me like many investors are hanging on "hope" rather than any real sign of turnaround. Personally, I think Talbots is the riskiest of the three, and suspect that Chico's is probably the least risky, but still, these stocks continue to strike me as majorly speculative instead of bargains.

I still prefer retail stocks like Urban Outfitters (Nasdaq: URBN), which is one that has managed to buck the summer's nasty trends (and has one of the smartest retail managements I can think of), or even American Eagle Outfitters (NYSE: AEO) or Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE: ANF), both of which have faltered recently but look pretty darn cheap; each trades at just 10 times earnings.

Talbots, Chico's, and Coldwater Creek suffer from a variety of major headwinds that go beyond the current economic malaise. Talbots and Chico's have each needed turnarounds for years, and all three cater to mature female shoppers (who are likely more fiscally conservative in tough times, plus, they may be in a demographic shift, fashion wise). For these three stocks, I still have to say: caveat emptor.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Gap and American Eagle Outfitters are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of American Eagle Outfitters. Gap used to be an Inside Value recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.     

Alyce Lomax owns shares of Urban Outfitters. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 04, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Stocklovr wrote:

    "For all three of these stocks, it looks to me like many investors are hanging on "hope" rather than any real sign of turnaround."

    What is value investing if not hanging around for "hope" that the market has mispriced your stock?

    Would you have the same opinion if we were in a rip roaring bull market???

    You are not going to get your "turnaround" in retail when the economy is slowing so I really don't see the point in looking for these retailers to turn around right now.

    Will these companies still be struggling in 5 years? (How about the Motley Fool professed hold of 3-5 years and perferably forever -- unless you've just made enough money so it's time to negate those rules and like Bill Mann, issue a sell rec. for IPHS!!! Sorry, but that one really annoys me.)

    -Slvr

    btw: I'm long CWTR but I don't panic and sell retailers in a recession.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2008, at 10:46 AM, FinancialWoman wrote:

    Your article made some very good points. As a female fiftyish shopper, clothes horse and long term investor, I have to say that the clothes in the latest two or three Talbot's catalogs have been outstanding. While I think the sales may continue to be affected by the economic slowdown, I do think the typical Talbot's shopper is beyond not being able to buy clothes. Talbot's is one of the few retailers that cater to the "more mature" crowd, and they have a strong following WHEN their clothes are as good as they are right now. For example, I recently walked into a meeting and a banker asked if my sandals were Talbot's, and went on to say how much she loves the store. Now that is brand recognition!

    The debt does concern me, but I wonder if Aeon, owning over 50% of the company, may come to their aid again if needed. I have also noticed that good changes have taken place since Trudy Sullivan took the helm. J. Jill concerns me somewhat simply due to the change in their look and comments I have heard from other women who were previously loyal J. Jill shoppers.

    Lastly, I cannot help but notice that the chart looks interesting, and as though Talbot's just may have bottomed.

    Disclosure: I own Talbot's shares, and I have been known to sell covered calls against them.

  • Report this Comment On September 10, 2008, at 9:50 PM, changeagent007 wrote:

    The problem with Talbots is a lack of quality change leadership.

    Yes, they have shed the old gas bags

    but Trudy Sulivan is a spent retread, Basha Cohen had questionable credentials and had not worked for four years prior to becoming the chief merchant, Mike Smaldone has his toeprints all over Ann Taylor's latest design and fit flop prior to becoming the chief creative officer, and the new chief supply officer is one-speed-only executive with the people management skill of a rhino, and a time bomb for a gender discrimination lawsuit.

    None of them has ever successfully led change of the magnitude they are now driving and it show: they are trying to change everything at once.

    That shows lack of focus and priorities and is a recipe for disaster.

    I question whether they can stay in business if these free spending self-serving executives fail to give women a reason to shop there.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 719753, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 4:16:41 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:02 PM
AEO $15.84 Up +0.05 +0.32%
American Eagle Out… CAPS Rating: ***
CHS $12.47 Up +0.12 +0.97%
Chico's FAS, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
CWTR $6.16 Down -0.03 -0.48%
Coldwater Creek, I… CAPS Rating: ***
ANF $35.01 Down -0.11 -0.31%
Abercrombie & Fitc… CAPS Rating: **
GPS $23.03 Up +0.17 +0.74%
The Gap, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
TLB $8.50 Down -0.08 -0.93%
The Talbots, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
URBN $32.43 Up +0.42 +1.31%
Urban Outfitters,… CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Amortization: Amortization refers either to paying debt in regular installments over time or deducting intangible capital expenses over time.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!