Finally, I May Be a Buyer

17 Recommendations

If you think this story sounds too good to be true, I don't blame you. I was a skeptic, too.

And I've been at this a long time. That includes five years holed up with a "quant" nerd who couldn't so much as flip a sofa cushion without finding "alpha." Yeah, yeah, I know what you're thinking …

What the heck is alpha?
Without digging myself too deep a hole, "alpha" is the excess return you're earning on your stock portfolio above what some academic would expect given its level of risk. Put another way, alpha is the measure of your ability to pick better stocks than I can.

This much I know for sure: Alpha is the driving force behind a $1.2 trillion (and shrinking!) hedge-fund industry. Kind of remarkable, given that I vaguely remember paying nearly that much for some wise guy to teach me that alpha doesn't even exist!

And for years, that's exactly what I believed. Sure, I'd seen investors beat the market. But I'd also seen others get crushed. There just never seemed any rhyme or reason to it all. Chet Hammersmith would get a hot hand for a year -- and then get his head handed to him the next. And so it goes in an efficient market.

Now it gets good …
So when my friend and colleague David Gardner started telling me he'd captured the ever-elusive alpha -- and that he'd hired a NASA scientist to prove it -- I barely gave it a second thought. True, this was the guy who told me to buy Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) back in 1997, before it went on a 2,700% run.

Not to mention Amgen (Nasdaq: AMGN) in 1998 and AOL in 1994 at 43 cents a share -- long before the Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) debacle. The guy has a nice touch, but that's a far cry from generating true, positive alpha. And, remember, all I really cared about in terms of alpha was that I barely believed it existed!

That's when the NASA scientist started playing hardball. First, he used his big brain (OK, probably a MacBook) to randomly generate 25,000 hypothetical stock portfolios. Next, he created a portfolio of his own, using David Gardner's proprietary, so-called "alpha-generating" model. Turns out the NASA guy's portfolio outperformed 99.4% of the random portfolios.

Wait until you hear how he did it
Amazingly, that experiment isn't what changed my mind. Before I tell you what did make me a buyer, you must be wondering what David is feeding into his supercomputer to make it spit that alpha out. Oddly enough, it's you. Seriously.

You see, David has long argued that many smart, ordinary investors will always be smarter than any one "expert." He's been proving this theory in an ad-hoc fashion for years. He used what he calls "community intelligence" to confirm his outlook on game developer Activision Blizzard (Nasdaq: ATVI), for example -- the pick has risen by more than 500% since. It was a similar story in 2001 with eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY) and in 2005 with Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq: ISRG), which has climbed by 407%.  

According to David, what's changed now is that he's found a way to collect his community intelligence on a mass scale and "quantify" it. In other words, he's transformed a disparate bunch of opinions, insights, and bits of knowledge from something he could vaguely process in his own head into something a guy from NASA could stuff into a model.

The experiment that changed everything
We discussed how David's NASA portfolio outperformed 99.4% of 25,000 random stock portfolios. But if you're like me, that sounds like a lot of fancy numbers. Here's a second experiment that convinced me that he and his scientist might really be on to something.

This time, they applied their model to a handful of real-life portfolios -- namely, the stocks recommended in Motley Fool premium newsletter services. I like this approach for two reasons. First, these are real stocks, handpicked by real advisors in real time. Second, the guys who assembled these portfolios are good.

For example, when they ran the numbers on Sept. 12, David and Tom Gardner's Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations had risen by an average of 42%. That's darn good. Yet when David optimized the portfolio using just one criterion from his model, he increased those results by another 17.6 percentage points -- and just as important, he did this with significantly fewer picks.

This is no fluke!
In fact, when taken across six different advisory services -- recommending stocks as diverse as Microsoft and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) -- the results held up. All told, David's "community intelligence" filter cut the number of picks nearly in half and increased the already blockbuster returns by a stunning 19 percentage points per pick.

So if you ever wondered how a NASA scientist would use your own intelligence to help you beat the market in theory, there you have it. Now, I'll tell you one way you can use alpha in your own portfolio, and then I'll show you how David Gardner proposes to do it on a grander scale.

Turning "alpha" loose in your portfolio is remarkably simple. If you're among the millions of investors who own a mutual fund, in fact, you'd do well to put it to work today. All you have to do is cross-reference the fund's alpha with its managerial tenure. (Morningstar's "Risk Measures" tab is a good place to go.) If you find a high alpha (the higher, the better) with a managerial tenure of five years or more, you may have found one of the few gems in the fund-manager world.

But back to David Gardner. As you probably know, he's been collecting intelligence data from more than 115,000 visitors to The Motley Fool website. Over the past few months, he assembled a team, including the NASA scientist I mentioned earlier, to help him analyze and back-test that data to consistently generate positive "alpha."

And he's done it!
Or so he assures me. David says he has finally tapped the collective intelligence of the world's smartest investors -- and more importantly, he can use this data to help you make money in your own portfolio. Here's how he plans to do it.

Over the next few weeks, David Gardner, along with longtime Motley Fool analyst Jeff Fischer, will invest $1 million of his company's real money in a long/short portfolio of stocks, options, and exchange-traded funds. The idea is to prove that they can combine their community-intelligence data and portfolio-management skills to thump the market with that $1 million investment.

Why should you care? Well, here's the thing. David will be inviting a small number of Motley Fool readers to follow along with his unusual experiment in real time. In fact, he will even announce his portfolio trades in advance -- so that you can buy (or short) ahead of him. But hurry, because the doors are closing in just three days.

If you're interested in learning more, check out this message from David Gardner himself. It could be just the thing you need to get you through this miserable market and out the other side with more money that you have right now. To hear it from David, and to receive a private invitation to learn more, simply enter your email address in the box below.

What do the unfolding financial crisis and ongoing market volatility mean for your money? The Fool's here with answers. Get the best of our daily commentary and analysis in your inbox simply by entering your email address in the box below.

Paul Elliott owns shares of Bank of America, an Income Investor recommendation. Microsoft is an Inside Value selection. eBay, Activision Blizzard, and Amazon are Stock Advisor picks. Intuitive Surgical is Rule Breakers pick. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • On October 14, 2008, at 4:36 PM, investingyoung wrote: Report this Comment

    Because this service costs frequent visitors to your site $1,000 in my opinion, the least you can do, is invest the $1,000 or a part of it to invest for a return on our investment. Just my opinion.

  • On October 15, 2008, at 12:05 PM, chali2na wrote: Report this Comment

    investingyoung-your comment makes no sense. what are you trying to say?

  • On October 15, 2008, at 12:47 PM, SteveTheInvestor wrote: Report this Comment

    Hmmm. I'm not sure what you are saying InvestingYoung. Perhaps that Motley Fool should establish their own mutual fund? Ok. Whatever.

  • On October 15, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Styex wrote: Report this Comment

    Put an actual fund out there that can be tracked and give it 10yrs. Then maybe then i'll believe you. But then again if found the "golden forumla" why are you telling us and why arn't you selling/using it at some mega hedge fund. If it sounds too good it is, plain and simple.

  • On October 16, 2008, at 9:52 AM, catoismymotor wrote: Report this Comment

    I think investingyoung tried to say that our $1,000 fee should be put into Mr. Gardner's cluster of stocks on our behalf so that we can reap the rewards.

    Maybe we need a Motley Fool ETF. I like to think that we could use Mr. Garner's formula as the basis for it. I need someone smarter and better looking than me to validate or vanquish this idea. Any takers?

  • On October 16, 2008, at 2:48 PM, knighttof3 wrote: Report this Comment

    Sorry, still not buying it. Why isn't David Gardner a trillionaire by now?

    Because his wealth is generated from subscriptions, not stocks. (Not counting his past inheritence or normal investment activities).

    Any financial advisor gets rich because of his clients, never the stock market. Curious, since he usually pretends to make his clients rich from the stock market.

  • On October 16, 2008, at 3:21 PM, CNMAIL wrote: Report this Comment

    "Yet when David optimized the portfolio using just one criterion from his model, he increased those results by another 17.6 percentage points -- and just as important, he did this with significantly fewer picks."

    So why not optimize all the Fool portfoios?

  • On October 18, 2008, at 2:45 AM, btideroll wrote: Report this Comment

    I have a few takes on this...and comments as well.

    1. The $999 fee is pretty steep compared to normal services. For 10X the cost of his normal subscription he must really believe this is going to work out.

    2. Following this model is seemingly going to be very costly and time consuming for the follower would it not? It would be pretty hard to follow the portfolio considering it will use a lot of different investment vehicles...so you'd already need to have a margin account and know what you are doing with all the tools (options, ETF, shorts, etc...). So it is not for novices or probably even intermediate investors. How much would you need to invest in the plan for it to be worth it? AND what would all of the ancillary trading costs be?

    Sounds like he's using the CAPS community to generate his "data" for the model. This is striking to me in a few ways and it is almost brilliant I guess. If he is using CAPS as market sentiment, and we, as CAPS contributors act in the market, if we act in such numbers to influence price (buying to raise, selling to lower) then he is basically riding the wave that we are practically creating (if that makes any sense). 'Course this would really only happen if the community represents the sentiment of the larger investor community and the actions there are in tandem with the CAPS calls here. But that's probably his whole premise and I think it just might work.

    Then all of this begs the question, if we are the ones providing the data, as noted by poster above, why isn't he at least using this in the subscription portfolios and why would we need to pay $1k a year to follow his moves when we have access to CAPS for free?

Add your comment.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 753114, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 11/22/2008 12:29:08 PM,

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access to keep reading:

“Finally, I May Be a Buyer”

Signing up allows you to comment on articles and on the discussion boards.

It's completely FREE and will take only 10 seconds.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Related Tickers

Amgen, Inc.

AMGN Up! $54.90 +4.77 (+9.52%) 4:00 PM
CAPS Rating:
1735 Outperforms
155 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 500800.03+6.32%
DJIA8,046.42+6.54%
NASD1,384.35+5.18%
Updated: 4:07:36 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

What changes are you making to your portfolio?

Sponsored by: