Satyam Seeks to Build Future for Its Family

Peter Lynch had a term for it: "deworsification." Another phrase might be "raiding the shareholder's larder."

Spending $1.6 billion to buy a couple of family-owned businesses was more than the market could bear from Indian IT outsourcing specialist Satyam Computer Services (NYSE: SAY  ) . With investors in open revolt, the stock tumbled more than 50% on the day.

The IT industry is facing some bleak prospects for the immediate future, and it seemed ludicrous for Satyam to be purchasing the distressed assets of the chairman's sons' even if Maytas Properties and Maytas Infra would "de-risk" Satyam's core business. Instead, it looked like a bailout of family members by overpaying for them (Maytas, by the way, is Satyam spelled backwards). The real estate business, for example, has a net worth of only $225 million, but Satyam was going to pay $1.3 billion for it. In fact, the entire deal would have wiped out all of the company's $1 billion cash position and substituted a net debt balance of $400 million.

Satyam has seriously damaged its corporate governance reputation, at least for the time being. Despite having won awards in the past for its governance practices, the consultant certainly has raised some warning flags. It also hurt much of the rest of the IT segment as Cognizant Technologies (Nasdaq: CTSH  ) , Infosys (Nasdaq: INFY  ) , and Wipro (NYSE: WIT  ) also fell, though not by nearly as much.

All in the family
Yet, such cozy deals aren't uncommon, though the size of this one raised eyebrows. Last year, for example, home decor outlet Bed Bath & Beyond (Nasdaq: BBBY  ) bought baby-goods retailer buybuy Baby from the sons of its co-chairman. They rationalized the purchase by saying that since women shop for home goods, selling pregnant women and new mothers baby stuff was a natural extension. Although the deal "only" cost $67 million, they might as well have opened an auto parts store since women drive cars, too.

Gap (NYSE: GPS  ) also doles out cash to family members, typically using the construction company of its founder's brother to build its new stores. Maybe it's the recession or a slowing of the number of new store openings, but Gap paid only $300,000 to the brother last year, down from $21 million in 2005. Quiksilver (NYSE: ZQK  ) is another example of a company that had to take big losses for its purchase of ski-maker Rossignol in a bid to help out a family friend.

Such related party transactions can become a minefield for investors navigating through them. It should be enough to make an investor think twice before investing in a company that has such cozy relationships with relatives.

Feel the heat
Satyam chairman Ramalinga Raju quickly backpedaled after getting an earful from investors, saying that although they still thought it was a good way to diversify, they were heeding the investor anger.

While there might be something to the notion that IT services have a bleak outlook at the same time the construction industry stands to benefit from a large infusion of government spending in the country's infrastructure, it's equally plausible to build the case that it was little more than a means to enrich family members caught in a depressed industry using Satyam shareholder wealth. Considering that its board of directors approved the deal, investors may want to keep that in mind as well when they come up for re-election.

Related (party) Foolishness:

Gap and Bed Bath & Beyond are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Satyam Computer Services, Gap, and Bed Bath & Beyond are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of Bed Bath & Beyond. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey owns shares of Bed Bath & Beyond but does not have a financial position in any of the other stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (19)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2008, at 2:51 PM, corporatecrusade wrote:

    Yeah,Mr.Raju is a visionary ( as per sailesh Shah Ex strategy head of Satyam-- Think of raju what kind of strategy advisors he had) Raju saw lot of synergy in what ever he does . By aquiring Real estate and Infra companies of his children he thought he created synegy between IT and real estate. Probably he owuld have thought in this down turn if his employees are not occupied with IT projects he can use them in realestate projects as site workers. Raju has one CSR ( Corporate Social Responsibility) project called 108 service which is US quivalent of 999. He is visionary .He thought there is synergy in this project with his company. when he takes this kind of horrific decisions lot of his shareholders get heart attck and need 108 ambulance services .

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 797461, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2014 2:50:31 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement