Recs

19

How Far Will Today's Stocks Take You?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

You may not know this, but stocks and subways have something in common.

Back when I lived in Boston, a ride on the "T" cost $0.85. That bought one token, and that's all it took to enter the system. Once inside, with a couple of exceptions on lines that left Boston and went out into the suburbs, you didn't have to pay again. It didn't matter whether you went two stops or 20, whether you went a few blocks or rode all the way from Southie to Somerville (a long trip by Boston standards) -- one token was what it cost you.

Even if they were just looking to avoid a few blocks' walk in nasty weather, people were usually willing to spend a token to get to where they wanted to go. I don't remember ever hearing anyone complain that they didn't get their money's worth because they didn't ride all the way from one end of the Red Line to the other.

So why do people put so much effort into trying to ride stocks from the absolute bottom to the top?

What if that was the bottom?
I hear an awful lot of people saying that they're waiting to buy stocks until the market hits bottom. That's a great idea in theory, but will they really be able to tell when that happens? While I personally suspect that we'll see new lows before this bear is done with us, as Fool Amanda Kish suggested yesterday, I don't actually know. Neither does anyone else.

There's a reason that market timing is so rarely a winning strategy -- the future is hard to predict! It's possible that things will get a lot worse, that the S&P 500 will drop to 600 or lower. It's also possible that the market will muddle around current levels for a while and then start to trend upward, as some money managers are predicting.

If you're one of those folks waiting for the bottom, you might have already missed it. But here's some good news: It doesn't matter.

Keep your destination in mind
Lots of people have made market-beating money on Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) in recent years despite buying at well above the $8 price the stock hit in 2002. Activision Blizzard (Nasdaq: ATVI  ) was a good buy at $3.48 when Fool co-founder David Gardner first recommended it to Motley Fool Stock Advisor subscribers in 2002 -- notwithstanding the fact that it dipped below $2 several months later. And plenty of Fools feel it's still a good buy at under $9 now.

You don't have to buy at the bottom to beat the market. Likewise, you don't have to sell at the top. If you bought Innophos (Nasdaq: IPHS  ) at $13 a year ago but failed to sell when the stock topped $40 this past summer, you're probably kicking yourself. But you're still up more than 50% at today's prices. Our brains naturally focus on the missed opportunity to gain more, but if we keep our long-term goal in mind -- to outperform the market -- selling today would still represent a huge success.

Several professional Fools and CAPS community members like well-run spicy-chicken pusher Buffalo Wild Wings (Nasdaq: BWLD  ) at today's prices, well above the sub-$15 levels we saw briefly in November. Likewise, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) is up about 30% from its November lows, but when viewed as a long-term proposition it still looks awfully cheap to many.

And that's the key: Think long-term.

The power of time
The great investing heroes, people like Warren Buffett and Sir John Templeton, have all preached a long-term view. If you're thinking of adding a stock such as Buffett-like insurer Markel (NYSE: MKL  ) , or commercial real estate whiz Jones Lang Lasalle (NYSE: JLL  ) , you're probably not thinking in terms of a six- or 12-month hold. You're probably thinking in terms of years, maybe a lot of years. I'm taking a look at buying both, and I'm thinking of them as very-long-haul holdings -- 20 years or more.

In the context of a decade or three, when you can expect a great stock to return several times your initial investment, 10%-20% on your initial purchase price doesn't make a whole lot of difference. "Buy low and sell high" is the route to investment success. Buying Apple at $20 in 2000 -- even though it went lower -- would have brought you lots of success. Google at $330 might not be the steal that Google at $250 was, but it could still end up being the kind of crazy-cheap bargain my grandkids will boggle at 40 years from now.

We may not be at the absolute bottom -- whether it's behind us or ahead of us -- but there are a lot of bargains out there right now. Founding Fools David and Tom Gardner and their team at Motley Fool Stock Advisor are working hard to find the best of them. And one of the stocks they recommend in their newest issue is exactly the kind of stock I've been talking about here.

It's a fantastic company, one that looks poised for a decade or more of tremendous growth. While it's well above its recent lows, it still seems like quite a bargain. Want to check it out? A free trial gives you 30 days of full access to the Stock Advisor service, with no obligation to subscribe. Click now.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor John Rosevear owns shares of Apple. Jones Lang Lasalle and Buffalo Wild Wings are Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendations. Markel is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Activision Blizzard and Apple are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. The Fool owns shares of Markel and Buffalo Wild Wings. Try any of our Foolish newsletters free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 06, 2009, at 6:18 PM, MAC4412 wrote:

    I bought MKL (8 shares ...whew, never bought a stock at 293/share). While I might just have 30years, maybe 40 because I plan to live to 100, I'm not sure how much of a profit I might see unless I buy more. Am I right?

  • Report this Comment On January 06, 2009, at 7:42 PM, BlueLakeVentures wrote:

    I agree and think the market will turn up sometime this year, you cannot time the market. http://bluelakeventures.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html

  • Report this Comment On January 07, 2009, at 7:56 AM, TMFMarlowe wrote:

    MAC4412, the stock price doesn't really matter. Whether you own 8 shares or 8000, if the stock goes up 30%, you've made 30%. And big-priced shares can certainly move through big ranges -- look at a chart of BRK-B over the last couple of years to see what I mean.

  • Report this Comment On January 07, 2009, at 7:59 AM, TMFMarlowe wrote:

    Oops, I hit "post comment" before I was done. Anyway, BRK-B's 52-week range is $2,451.00 - $4,858.00 -- it hasn't been immune to the volatility that has hit the broader market just because of its big share price. It is definitely more thinly-traded than many big companies, but average volume is still almost 5 million shares a day.

    Thanks for reading.

    John Rosevear

  • Report this Comment On January 07, 2009, at 1:14 PM, MAC4412 wrote:

    Thanks John,

    I guess my point it that I will need to buy more to see any really worthwhile gains.

    Also why don't stocks like this and BRK-B split to make them more affordable? Many other companies do.

  • Report this Comment On January 10, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Rone222 wrote:

    Hi John,

    BRK.B is a partial share of BRK.A. ($94,750.00 as of 1/9/09). I don't see how it could be split lower.

    Ron

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 804780, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/14/2012 11:47:47 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,878.28 4.24 0.03%
S&P 500 1,350.50 -1.27 -0.09%
NASD 2,931.83 0.44 0.02%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 4:00 PM
IPHS $49.01 Down -0.37 -0.75%
Innophos CAPS Rating: *****
JLL $81.89 Down -0.60 -0.73%
Jones Lang LaSalle… CAPS Rating: *****
MKL $408.60 Down -2.82 -0.69%
Markel Corp CAPS Rating: *****
GOOG $609.76 Down -2.44 -0.40%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $509.46 Up +6.86 +1.36%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
ATVI $12.48 Up +0.23 +1.88%
Activision Blizzar… CAPS Rating: ****
BWLD $84.79 Down -1.10 -1.28%
Buffalo Wild Wings CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement