Recs

2

Lower Energy Earnings Shouldn't Surprise You

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

It's always strange when the market reacts with shock and awe to an event or trend that most would have thought to be completely predictable.

Take, for instance, Chevron's (NYSE: CVX  ) pre-release of its fourth-quarter results late last week. Believe it or not, the company expects that, when all is said and done, its earnings will slide for the quarter, both year over year and versus the prior quarter's estimate-beating results. Chevron's news emerged just as the world's two biggest oilfield service companies were announcing employee cutbacks.

The key, of course, is the continuing drop in oil prices that everybody knows about, or should. So why the surprise?

Specifically because the company's crude price realizations in the U.S. fell by more than half during October and November to $61.70 a barrel, from $112.22 in the previous quarter. Global prices reached their all-time high above $145 in the third quarter, compared to a close at just $40.83 on Friday. At the same time, natural gas prices dropped by 42% from the third quarter to the first two months of the fourth quarter. Downstream, the company's refinery margins also declined.

Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB  ) , the oilfield services majordomo, said it would lay off about 1,000 workers in the U.S., along with an unspecified number in other areas of the world. Its second-in-command, Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) , also will be cutting back, although further details about where and how many workers will go still aren't available.

And Chevron isn't alone. Take a look at the year-on-year EPS changes expected for a mixture of Big Oil companies, independent producers, and oilfield service types:

Company

Q4 2007
EPS

Estimated Q4
2008 EPS

Expected Change

Apache (NYSE: APA  )

$2.92

$1.52

(48%)

Chevron

$2.25

$1.79

(20%)

ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP  )

$2.48

$1.56

(37%)

Devon (NYSE: DVN  )

$1.93

$1.28

(34%)

Halliburton

$0.71

$0.75

6%

Schlumberger

$1.11

$1.09

(2%)

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  )

$2.13

$1.59

(25%)

Source: Yahoo! Finance.

At this point, expected energy earnings don't make for a pretty picture. Indeed, the service companies are expected to perform the most solidly, with Halliburton likely to check in with an improved quarter, and Schlumberger predicted to be nearly unchanged from a year ago.

At the same time, with crude prices continuing to slide, the next quarter's earnings dip should be more severe than the fourth quarter of 2008. Nevertheless, as most Fools with a taste for energy know, my strong belief is that the steady six-month energy price declines and resulting development project cancellations will almost certainly lead to sharper oil and gas price hikes once our economy finds its sea legs.

For now, however, I continue to believe that long-term holdings of ExxonMobil are the best way to assuage your energy investing thirst. It's the largest of the public companies, and its solid balance sheet will provide management with ample flexibility amid the current hiatus.

In the world of Motley Fool CAPS, ExxonMobil is a four-star player. Why not add your opinion to the mix?

More energetic Foolishness:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned. He does, however, welcome your questions or comments. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Brettze wrote:

    THE UPCOMING BIG OIL STOCK CRASH SHOULD NOT SURPRISE YOU, ALRIGHT?? IT HAS YET TO HAPPEN AND IT HAS YET TO SURPRISE YOU , MORONS!! WE NEED BIG OIL STOCKS TO CRASH TO TEACH SHAREHOLDERS AN IMPORTANT LESSON.... THEY HAVE NOWHERE TO RUN AND HIDE!!! YOU HEAR ME?????

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Brettze wrote:

    LESS ENERGY CONSUMPTION INCLUDING FIREWOOD WILL REVERSE GLOBAL WARMING MUCH SOONER THAN EXPERTS AND AL GORE THINK... MY THEORY IS THAT MOST OF THE GREENHOUSE GASES LIES BELOW ABOUT A FEW THOUSAND FEET IN ALTIITUDE... WE SHOULD NOT BE AS CONCERNED ABOUT THE HIGHER ALTITUDE GREENHOUSE GAS EFFECTS AS LOWER ALTITUDE GREENHOUSE GAS EFFECTS... I AM CONVINCED THAT ONCE WE CUT BACK ENERGY CONSUMPTION INCLUDING FIREWOOD, WE WILL SEE IMMEDIATE REVERSAL IN POLAR ICE MELTING.... IT IS USELESS TO WORRY ABOUT HIGH ALTITUDE GREENHOUSE GAS EFFECTS AS THEY TAKE LONGER TO DISSIPATE.. WE CAN DO A LOT ABOUT LOWER ALTITUDE GREENHOUSE GASES THAT GET THERE ONLY RECENTLY... IT IS FAR THICKER AT LOWER ALTITUDES THAN HIGHER ALTITUDES... SO LETS BAN FIREWOOD NOW!!

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Brettze wrote:

    POLAR ICECAPS DOESNT LIE AT HIGH ALTITUDES, RIGHT?? SO IT IS LOGICAL TO FOCUS ON LOWER ALTITUDES ... THIS IS WHERE WE SHOULD START CONCETRATING OUR EFFORTS IN ENERGY CONSERVATION.... FUEL EFFICIENT CARS ARE NOT ENOUGH... WE MUST FOCUS ON OUR HOMES AS ANOTHER BIG USER OF ENERGY... WE DONTNEED TO HEAT AND COOL ENTIRE HOUSES... WE REALLYNEED TO HEAT ROOMS THAT ARE OCCUPIED BY RESIDENTS.. OUR FURNACE MAKERS MUST REDESIGN FURNACES OR MODIFY OUR EXISTING FURNACES IN OUR HOMES TO BE MORE INTELLIGIENT... WE DONT NEED 80-150,000 BTU FURNACES FOR EXAMMPLE... WE CAN DO FINE WITH 10-20,000 BTU FURNACES THAT CAN DIRECT LIMITED HEATING TO ROOMS WHERE WE ARE. IT IS COMPARABLE TO UNOCCUPIED SEATS IN OUR CARS THAT WE SHOULD CARPOOL MORE... OUR HOUSES HAS EMPTY ROOMS THAT ARE HEATED AND COOLED UNNEEDLESSLY.. SAME GOES FOR OFFICE BUILDINGS WHERE MANY ROOMS OR EVEN CUBICLES ARE UNOCCUPIED AND DO NOT REQUIRE HEATING AND COOLING... WE ARE NOT EVEN THERE BY A LONG SHOT AS FAR AS ENERGY CONSERVATION GOES... WE ARE STILL SO FAR BEHIND... WE MUST STOP WORRYING ABOUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO OUR ENERGY INDUSTRIES AND START WORRYING ABOUT ENERGY CONSERVATION... WE WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO HAND OUT BAILOUT MONEY TO EXXON MOBILS IF NEEDED TO BE... I DONT CARE!!! YOU GET THE DRIFT??

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 3:25 PM, botfeeder wrote:

    What "lesson" are shareholders supposed to learn?

    And, why do wackos always type in uppercase?

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Brettze wrote:

    Why do readers put words in one ear and out the ear!! So I figure that uppercase would be hard to get out the other ear.. it will be stuck in the reader's head!!!

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Brettze wrote:

    Also it is easier to read in your netbooks especially or even worse ....your text cellphone... duh?

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Brettze wrote:

    i find that uppercase is easier on my eyes... I dont like to strain my eyes like most of you... you wont admit that...

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Brettze wrote:

    anyone who call uppercase like shouting is simply wussies!!!

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Brettze wrote:

    those gothic sissies1!!

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Brettze wrote:

    computer users often lurch heads forward with noses sticking against the screens so they dont have to strain eyes.. they look dumb to me... I usually sit back with my face about a yard away from my screen... This is why i use uppercase so i can see what i am typing whle relaxing my neck and back in great comfort1!!! Compuer engineers are too dumb for their jobs!!! Even AOL is stuppid with its own recommendation that I use 96 dpi instead of 120 dpi text.. This disgusts me a lot!! stupid aol!!

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 4:19 PM, Brettze wrote:

    more and more computer users are suffering neck pains from sticking heads toward screens with keyboards right under their chins... Chumps!

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 6:11 PM, Commish4 wrote:

    brettze may be ok if he gets back on his meds and gets some counseling

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 808341, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/14/2012 5:28:30 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,878.28 4.24 0.03%
S&P 500 1,350.50 -1.27 -0.09%
NASD 2,931.83 0.44 0.02%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 4:00 PM
CVX $106.49 Up +0.11 +0.10%
Chevron Corp CAPS Rating: *****
SLB $77.80 Down -0.23 -0.29%
Schlumberger CAPS Rating: *****
XOM $84.67 Up +0.25 +0.30%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
HAL $35.70 Down -0.44 -1.22%
Halliburton Compan… CAPS Rating: ****
COP $73.60 Up +0.79 +1.09%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: *****
DVN $66.90 Up +1.26 +1.92%
Devon Energy Corp CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement