Recs

21

I Turned $3,000 into $210,000

This article's swaggering headline smacks of exaggeration -- but it's true.

How it happened
Picture it: New Jersey, 1995. Although not then a Motley Fool employee, I was, perhaps like you, an avid reader of Fool.com. Founding Fools David and Tom Gardner occasionally recommended stocks, and one of their recommendations was an online service provider, America Online.

I was still quite new to investing, and I didn't know enough to do much of my own research. But I did have one thing going for me: I was an AOL customer. I used the service every day, and I liked what I saw of its user-friendliness, utility, and potential. So I bought. I snapped up $3,000 worth of shares and hung on.

Over the next several years, the stock went up and down, sometimes significantly -- but I held on. It mostly went up, and it split and split. I remember checking my portfolio regularly -- several times a day! -- to see how rich I was becoming. Near the stock's peak, I had a 70-bagger! My $3,000 investment had turned into $210,000. If it doubled in value only twice more, I'd be (almost) a millionaire! All from a measly $3,000 investment.

Did I sell shares along the ride up? No. (Some of us don't know when to cut our losses.) Did I sell at least some near the top, when my mom told me to? Nope. (That strange thudding sound you hear is me banging my head on my desk. The silence is my mom, biting her tongue.) I held on.

AOL merged with Time Warner in 2001, and for years after that, the stock struggled. I remember when shares were priced in the $70s, but it's a fuzzy memory. They spent years below $20 until relatively recently, and recently they've been in the single digits. I did sell a big chunk of my shares -- in the teens -- when I needed money for a down payment on my house. And I finally got smart -- I sold more shares to diversify into other stocks instead of holding a big chunk of my net worth in a company in which I no longer had faith.

I continue to hold a few shares, though, and despite my inclination to curse my stupidity for not selling earlier, I'm still sitting on a handsome profit, even at current levels. My cost basis is ridiculously low, and this has still been one of my best investments ever. I shouldn't complain.

How you can do it
If any part of this story appeals to you, know that you have a chance to make it yours -- perhaps with a happier ending -- if you make a few decisions differently. (You might end up as an accidental billionaire!)

Buy what you know
First, pay attention to products and services you know, use, and love -- especially if you see more and more people using them. There may be a great stock behind them, and knowing their products or services will go a long way toward understanding the business. Plenty of well-known companies have done phenomenally well over the past decade or two -- let's look at a few.

Are you involved in agriculture, aware of new seeds and farming technology introduced by the likes of Monsanto (NYSE: MON  ) ? Do you enjoy playing video games sold by Electronic Arts (Nasdaq: ERTS  ) ? Have you recently researched and bought some solar energy equipment for your home, perhaps items made by Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR  ) ? Well, Monsanto had a bad 2008, like most companies, but over the past five years (including 2008), it has averaged a 42% annual gain. Over the past decade, Electronic Arts has trounced the market's average return, while Evergreen Solar has averaged nearly 7% annually over the past five years. These companies have performed rather well, right under our noses.

Beware what you don't
Along those same lines, be wary of what you don't understand. If you don't understand how a business makes money, you probably won't be able to tell when business is going badly. If you don't understand the world of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells, then maybe you shouldn't be invested in Transocean (NYSE: RIG  ) . Level 3 Communications (Nasdaq: LVLT  ) has been one of the Nasdaq's most actively traded stocks. Do you have a sound understanding of how it makes it money? If not, learn more or steer clear.

Hang on for the ride
If you buy into a company hoping that it will be a multibagger for you, buy to hold as long as you continue to understand the business, strategy, and leadership. If you have faith in the company's future, it's often best to just hang on, despite inevitable hiccups. If you still have long-term confidence, don't let naysayers in the media get you out of a stock because of short-term concerns.

Consider Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO  ) or Pfizer (NYSE: PFE  ) . Both stocks have earned incredible returns for early investors and many still have high expectations for the companies' future performance, but both have averaged annual losses over the past decade.

Sell if things get too crazy
Consider selling some of your shares if they hit levels you can't justify or if the company is facing some long-term problems. That was my main mistake -- irrationally and greedily hoping to get even richer. If a stock is trading for far more than you know it's worth, and you still hang on, you're no longer investing -- you're speculating, and at great risk.

This kind of issue is what investors in companies such as customer information management specialist salesforce.com need to think about. Its stock was recently trading at a P/E ratio above 100, based on trailing-12-month earnings. Is that reasonable, or has the stock gotten ahead of itself?

Get help from the pros
Finally, consider checking out the stocks that David and Tom Gardner recommend. (Or invest on your own -- this is, according to some, the best investing opportunity in 35 years.) Their Motley Fool Stock Advisor service, launched more than six years ago, offers two picks (and two investing styles) each month. They have a few losers, of course, but on average, their recommendations have recently been beating the S&P 500 by more than 29 percentage points.

I invite you to try Stock Advisor free for 30 days, when you'll have full access to all past issues and recommendations. I've found some good stocks for my own portfolio there.

Here's to big profits in your future!    

This article was originally published Feb. 2, 2006. It has been updated.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Time Warner and Coca-Cola. For more about Selena, view her bio and her profile. Pfizer is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Pfizer and Coca-Cola are Motley Fool Inside Value selections. Electronic Arts is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns shares of Pfizer. Try any one of our investing services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2009, at 12:01 PM, GuynamedJake wrote:

    I think the point of the article is this: you DIDN'T turn 3k into 210k. You may have turned a tidy profit, but it's impossible to time the markets. This headline is just plain silly.

    Want to make money investing? Don't swing for the fences - make rational decisions for the long term.

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2009, at 12:59 PM, pbdotc wrote:

    well aren't you a fancy pants

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2009, at 4:14 PM, storm123645 wrote:

    yep, you are a fool!

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2009, at 5:54 PM, nimrod06 wrote:

    I know a guy who turned $3300 into more than $2 million trading stock options.

    So it can be done, it;s a fact.

    He started in the fall of 2005 and it took him one and a half years to reach $2 mil. mark.

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2009, at 9:59 PM, steven107 wrote:

    I turned 500 into 4000 once, but I didnt sell and it went back to 800, because I was a noob.

    I turned that 800 into 6000 once, it was luck, I didn't sell till it went back to 4000.

    I also turned 2000 into 0 once. It was an approved medical product, with 4 years ahead of competition, with fda requirement that this product must be used, and that it was the only one approved to be used, I believe it was supposed to be used twice annually, with certain patient population. I have no idea how the management screwed that up. They ran it straight into the ground from 40 to 2, and then sold it off for that price.

    A couple fool's picks, helped me turn a few thousand a piece into a few pennies. They made good presentations that I agreed with at the time, but as the trades turned sour, they never gave up and just praised the stocks all the way down, using emotion rather than logic to keep the readers in the stocks. Terms like, The stock has become extremely cheap, rather than, the trade has turned against us, perhaps teh market knows something that we do not, or perhaps our reasoning is faulty, in a way that we do not perceive as of yet. Also, terms like, you would have to be a fool to get out of this stock now. I have since then realized they know no more than I, and think things through with no more detail I.

    If the author doesn't care to know how my trades have gone, then maybe he will realize that we or at least I do not care how his has gone either. So stop using those headlines. Actually if he were to talk about actual trades, I might be more interested, rather than the fakish, I made a fortune from a shoestring, a piece of used bubblegum and some wire.

  • Report this Comment On January 18, 2009, at 8:47 AM, wuff3t wrote:

    "If the author doesn't care to know how my trades have gone, then maybe he will realize that we or at least I do not care how his has gone either."

    The author is a she, surely? With a name like Selena.

  • Report this Comment On January 19, 2009, at 9:15 PM, steven107 wrote:

    Yep, your right; but you forgot to point out my misspellings, and I'm sure despite my favoring the comma that in the sentence that you quoted and perhaps this one as well, I could have used more.

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2009, at 12:02 PM, VetteFever wrote:

    Steven, you are spot on my friend. I've been a Fool for a year, but I'm not sure how much longer I can be a Fool. CHK is the perfect example. I have watched that puppy for about 4 1/2 years I guess. Was probaby around $18-20 when it found it's way on my radar. Much to my chagrin, I watched CHK all the way to $70. I then watched it come all the way back, back to $60, back to $50. The inhouse Fools were putting out "buy below $48". After doing my own dd, I held out as long as I could and bought at $42 and change. Then $32. Then $16. I know market conditions, hedge fund liquidations, insider selling and other things were responsible, but I can't get away from the idea that the Fools could have been a little prescient and a little more diligent in their research. Instead, as you so eloquently put it, "They made good presentations that I agreed with at the time, but as the trades turned sour, they never gave up and just praised the stocks all the way down, using emotion rather than logic to keep the readers in the stocks. Terms like, The stock has become extremely cheap, rather than, the trade has turned against us, perhaps teh market knows something that we do not, or perhaps our reasoning is faulty, in a way that we do not perceive as of yet." Thus, here I am. I still believe in the company, and I'm still a holder of the stock, but now I'm dollar-cost-averaging in at good spots, for I still believe nat gas will do well in the future in a better economy, and I still believe that CHK is going to play a part. Then again, maybe I'm just a fool. <sigh>

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 9:32 AM, steven107 wrote:

    They need to make the author's name more prominent in large bold font with multiple white space before the article, and give the author a reputation rating, that goes up and down based on the article reccommendation or some similar method; because when one author gets on your nerves, it makes them all look bad. It's hard to remember the names from one story to the next. It's easier to just label them all 'Fools'. A reputation rating would make it easier to seperate out the honorable ones from the dishonorable.

  • Report this Comment On February 03, 2009, at 10:02 AM, VetteFever wrote:

    Author ratings would definitely be a plus. Due to the Fools' knack for re-running 'updated' articles that have been previously published, you do get kinda familiar with many of the 'authors'. Therefore, you know which ones to take with a grain of salt. As for myself, I've got to the point where I trust very few people's opinion. The way I look at it, I'll do my own due diligence, make my own decisions, and in the end, I'll have no one to blame (or thank) other than myself. I sign this a former Fool. :-)

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 812268, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/9/2012 10:00:29 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:01 PM
MON $78.33 Down -0.81 -1.02%
Monsanto Company CAPS Rating: ****
PFE $21.14 Up +0.13 +0.62%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
RIG $50.53 Up +1.09 +2.20%
Transocean, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
LVLT $21.46 Up +0.15 +0.70%
Level 3 Communicat… CAPS Rating: ***
EA $17.87 Down -0.37 -2.03%
Electronic Arts CAPS Rating: ***
ESLRQ.PK $0.09 Up +0.01 +7.50%
Evergreen Solar, I… CAPS Rating: **
KO $67.97 Down -0.36 -0.53%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement