Recs

24

5 Stocks to Wear to the Inauguration

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

So much for an Inauguration Day rally.

Of course, as I see it, if you were banking on a stock rally this week (or this month) on the back of Obama's ascension to the presidency, you're wasting your time. I'm not being a curmudgeon. I don't know whether or not the market will rally this week (and nobody else does, either, despite the numerous pronouncements on the subject). However, even if the market does rally, it's very unlikely to make a meaningful difference to your long-term returns.

Looking beyond the end of this week, however, it is worthwhile to think about the longer-term impact the new administration could have on different sectors of the economy.

The opportunity in a changing workforce
First, if Obama wants to tackle the looming problem of entitlement spending, raising the age of retirement would be a sensible measure. There is no reason to treat the age of retirement as a physical constant -- full retirement age has already been increased from 65 to 67 for those born in 1960 or later. So it's hardly absurd to adjust it further, especially given that average life expectancy has increased by more than 10 years since the Social Security Act was passed in 1935.

If the retirement age were increased -- or if baby boomers decide to postpone their retirement -- the resulting increase in the labor force could benefit business service companies such as Paychex (NYSE: PAYX  ) , Automatic Data Processing (NYSE: ADP  ) , or Administaff (NYSE: ASF  ) . These firms help companies with the clockwork of employment, including payroll processing and benefits administration.

One alternative that's more equal than others
During the election campaign, there was much talk of developing alternative energy sources. If Obama is as pragmatic and fair-minded as they say, he'll surely recognize the enormous benefits of nuclear energy -- the most viable form of alternative energy on a national scale. When I sat down with super-investor Ralph Wanger back in 2006, he predicted the resurgence of nuclear power in this country.

As this master small-cap investor pointed out, however, there are few small firms that are involved in this business -- it tends to be the General Electrics (NYSE: GE  ) and ABBs (NYSE: ABB  ) of this world. Since that conversation, Entergy (NYSE: ETR  ) has been inching toward becoming a pure-play nuclear power company. Exelon (NYSE: EXC  ) , the country's largest nuclear power generator, would also benefit from this trend.

As you can see, it's not just about infrastructure. These are two areas that could be well worth pondering as the Presidency changes hands.

More Foolishness:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The bear market of 2008 could spell opportunity in 2009 and beyond. Lower equity prices mean better future returns for those who have the conviction to invest in straightforward, outstanding businesses now. The team at Motley Fool Inside Value can help you find those businesses. To find out their latest picks now, sign up for a 30-day free trial.

Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA has no beneficial interest in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. Paychex is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Paychex and Administaff are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2009, at 5:16 PM, FinancialFellow wrote:

    I wonder how large of an impact federal policies really have on the impact of individual companies - when compared to a myriad of other factors. I'm inclined to think that the government would really have to dump an unbelievably serious amount of money at infrastructure to really have a significant benefit to on individual, large blue chip stocks.

    Frankly, I think it may be time to start shifting more of your portfolio to international stocks: http://financialfellow.com/2009/01/19/us-stocks-vs-foreign-s...

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2009, at 6:50 PM, bkill wrote:

    While life expectancy has increased 10 years, the more important question is, has the number of productive years per worker increased in a 1:1 ratio? Simply because I may live to be 85, rather than 75; doesn't mean I've automatically gained 10 productive years. I may simply be spending more years in questionable health, both physically and cognitively.

    Further, extending the retirement age delays the departure of employees from the workforce, thus exacerbating the current imbalance in the supply of workers vying for a limited number of jobs. Beyond potentially consigning more individuals to poverty by increasing the lag time between leaving the workforce and collecting SS, there seems to be little merit to this suggestion. The exception being when an individual has the physical and mental acuity to compete successfully against those who may be 50 years younger and anxious for a shot at the same job.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2009, at 7:30 PM, TMFAleph1 wrote:

    bkill,

    I hear your arguments and I think they are worthy of consideration. Note, however, that I didn't suggest that the increase in the retirement age need exactly match the increase in life expectancy.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2009, at 8:20 PM, skully201 wrote:

    Why not extend the retirement age for ss? And be sure to train several more million physical therapists and extend health care benefits for physical therapy by 200 or 300%. Or we could just let our older workers that will have to do heavy labor resulting in injuries from working beyond their true productive years go home and sit around the house and hurt; or wait for meals on wheels or some other agency help.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2009, at 8:57 PM, bkill wrote:

    XMFMarathonMan ...

    I understand your sentiment. I guess my real point is that programs such as SS need to have hard boundaries such as age qualifications or some other objective marker. I know many 70-somethings who are indeed capable of working and effectively competing with younger workers. Conversely, there are many, many folks whose bodies/brains give out before whatever arbitrary point is established. This, in turn, leads to a completely different discussion of how medicine can keep a person going perhaps beyond what nature intended, not to mention the resources invested in that effort for what may be diminishing returns. (And we're not even taking into account what this hypothetical person wants nor other ethical issues involved.) It's complicated and there's no easy, one-size-fits-all answer. On a positive note, it's thru discussions such as this that we can advance ideas, analyze possibilities and, with luck, develop answers that serve all citizens better than the current systems which were designed to answer the challenges of a different century. A tip-o-the-hat to you for raising the issue and trying to connect such a thorny problem with how it may influence the investing strategies of all Fools.

  • Report this Comment On January 20, 2009, at 9:35 PM, TMFAleph1 wrote:

    bkill,

    I appreciate the friendly, positive manner in which you are willing to discuss these thorny questions. Your comments do you credit.

    I do, in fact, think (as I think I detect you may) that we have lost sight of the question of whether the role of medicine should be to extend life at any cost. It would probably more effective to examine this issue before any considerations on the problem of the solvency of Medicare/ Social Security.

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2009, at 4:57 AM, g42l wrote:

    What if social security paid only to those who had paid into the system, instead of the welfare program that it is now.

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2009, at 8:32 AM, kdts2002 wrote:

    Why not raise the cap on SS from $96,000 to all income or something more reasonable to say $500,000?

    That would solve a lot of SS's problems right off the bat.

    And I agree to only let the people that paid in draw it instead of the welfare that it is.

  • Report this Comment On January 22, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Epiphany11 wrote:

    Nuclear Power? Since there's no way to safely contain the radioactive waste from nuclear power, this will simply add to the ongoing super-pollution of our planet. No containment material (concrete/steel, et al)...and I mean NOTHING can be assured to last thousands of years. Sorry, but that constitutes the Republican's philosophy on the environment, "I'll be dead by then, so who cares?" It's very, very selfish to maintain our groovy lifestyle by leaving the deplorable mess to future generations.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 813280, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 8:27:55 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:05 PM
EXC $36.90 Up +0.04 +0.11%
Exelon Corp CAPS Rating: *****
GE $19.20 Down -0.05 -0.26%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
NSP $25.16 Down -0.03 -0.12%
Insperity CAPS Rating: ****
ABB $16.18 Down -0.22 -1.34%
ABB CAPS Rating: *****
ADP $52.68 Down -0.47 -0.88%
Automatic Data Pro… CAPS Rating: ****
ETR $64.51 Up +0.16 +0.25%
Entergy Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement