Don't Invest Another Penny

Mutual funds may be the thing for you, but they're an expensive way to invest. So, if you have the slightest inclination to "do it yourself" -- and make a lot more money -- you should read this.

I just want what's coming to me!
With the exception of local property taxes, no mechanism I've encountered picks your pocket more efficiently than the U.S. mutual fund industry. And yes, that includes the IRS.

Think about it. Uncle Sam takes a piece of every penny you earn each year, but your mutual fund manager is worse. He isn't happy with his cut of what your money earns. (We'll assume for now that he actually makes you money.)

No, your fund manager wants more -- much more. When I tell you how much more, you may not believe it, so I'll warm you up with a quick story I invented for just such an occasion.

Wahoo! My fund manager's a genius!
The year is 1990. The economy is stagnant, Saddam Hussein is rattling his saber, and President Bush assures us, "This will not stand." And you, the dummy that you are, just dumped 10 grand into a mutual fund.

But don't worry, your fund manager doesn't buy the gloom and doom. And he doesn't buy diversification, either. No, your guy buys technology. So he rolls the dice on just four tech stocks.

You hit paydirt! Now it's New Year's Day 2000, and just look at what's become of your $10,000 stake ...

  • Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) : $25,625
  • Nortel Networks (NYSE: NT  ) : $45,736
  • Adobe Systems (Nasdaq: ADBE  ) : $37,254
  • Motorola (NYSE: MOT  ) : $26,215

Happy New Year! You're sitting on $135,000! But wait. Mutual funds have a price -- maybe a lot more than you think.

Surprise! You don't have $135,000
Assuming your fund manager hits you up for a 2% annual fee (not cheap, but hardly unheard of), you owe him roughly $2,250. That seems fair enough. After all, the fellow just made you $135,000. But there's a catch.

That $2,250 you just paid is for the last year alone. You've been paying out every year along the way. By New Year's Day 2000, you'd have paid the rascal nearly $10,000 in fees, and the lost profits on those fees would have cost you $25,000. And that's just over 10 short years!

That's a high price, but it gets worse. Imagine if you'd invested $20,000 instead of $10,000. You'd be paying twice as much! And what do you get for all that extra money -- for paying twice as much? Not much, as far as I can tell.

Oh, yes, it gets worse still
What if it turns out you're paying for nothing? I mean, let's face it, you're not going to buy into a miracle fund like the one I just described. Your fund manager won't be a genius. More likely, he'll be an Ivy League MBA looking to keep his job and follow the herd -- or worse.

Don't believe me? Check out the list of widely held institutional stocks. I'll spare you the trouble: You'll find Merck (NYSE: MRK  ) and Altria (NYSE: MO  ) in the mix, alongside a few dozen other usual suspects. Now, run down the top holdings in your mutual funds. See anything familiar?

Worse yet, even if your fund manager does stumble on a category-killer like medical device maker Medtronic (NYSE: MDT  ) , or any other multibagger, what are the chances he'll have the guts to hang on for the entire ride? More likely, he will buy and sell many times over.

You guessed it: In addition to the outrageous annual fee, you get murdered on taxes and transaction costs.

And it gets worse ...
Because here's the thing. In any given year, the IRS can tax you only on what you earn that year. When you invest in a mutual fund, your fund manager takes a cut of everything you have ... year after year after year.

Worse, your manager not only might fail to keep pace with the market in any given year (remember, most do), he or she might actually lose you money. Yet, even if you don't make a penny in year 11 of our previous example, you'll still have to hand over another few thousand dollars.

That bites. Yet, for all that, you may have no interest whatsoever in researching stocks -- even with the help of someone you can trust. If so, mutual funds may be the only game in town. It definitely beats staying out of stocks over the long haul, but you can agree that it's a broken model.

Something better to consider
If you want to take advantage of the bargains in today's markets, but balk at buying a house in the Hamptons for somebody you don't even know, try David and Tom Gardner's Motley Fool Stock Advisor free for 30 days. The Motley Fool co-founders can't guarantee that they will always outperform the S&P 500, but that's what they have done over the past six-plus years.

And that's their sworn mission, something 75% of mutual fund managers do not do. Best of all, as your portfolio grows, your costs won't. Joining David and Tom at Stock Advisor won't set you back two grand a year to join the $100,000 club ... or $120,000 a year to be the $6 million man or woman. That should be your goal, after all -- and it isn't one you should approach with mixed feelings.

We've been through a tough time together. It's only natural to feel uneasy, but this is no time to give up on stocks for the long-term. To steal a phrase from that sour-faced know-it-all on the TD AMERITRADE commercials, "You can do this." For a little help, give Stock Advisor a try. To learn more, click here now.

This article was originally published June 13, 2006. It has been updated.

Paul Elliott does not own shares of any company mentioned. Of course, you can see all of David and Tom's Stock Advisor recommendations instantly with your free trial. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2009, at 11:23 AM, plagjr wrote:

    Paul Elliot - you should be ashamed of yourself. You should be embarrassed. Not only is your article based on a self-proclaimed "quick story (you) invented", but to cap it all off you pawn a stock picker service at the end of your article. Correction, you didn't write an article - you wrote an advertisement. I hope the Motley Fool didn't pay you to write that crap. Not only did you pump the Motley Fool's paid stock picker service, you also pump TD Ameritrade who encourages trading to do-it-yourselfers. Could you be any more irresponsible Paul Elliot? Furthermore, your "article" is surrounded by banner ads for other stock picker-focused websites that pay the Motley Fool money. Shameful. It'd be nice if you disclosed the money paid to Motley Fool by the advertisers who might benefit from your irresponsible writing. I'm just disgusted....

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2009, at 5:49 PM, pgoel6uc wrote:

    WOW! This is the first article I have read trouncing mutual funds for its costs and selling you a product so that you can buy your own stocks! So rather than giving away 1% (let's be real: include index funds/ETFs in portfolio, and your net expense ratio will easily be less than 1%) of my initial investment of $10,000 (=$100) for stock picking, diversification (usually 100s or even 1000s of stocks in a MUF), expertise (arguably the same as the gardners) and trade commissions over the course of the year, I can give them $150 upfront so that I can trade my own (4?) stocks (and pay brokerage). Brilliant!! And I am sure their strategies will be much more tax effecient than index funds!!

    I have nothing against the 'co-founders': may be they are geniuses. But trouncing mutual funds like this... tsk tsk!

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2009, at 11:02 PM, Rasbold wrote:

    I will agree that mutual funds suck. I have had some that performed well, and others not so. The bottom line on them is that the fees are killers; trade commissions are bad enough, don't buy someone else a car. Do your own research, learn as much as you can. Open practice accounts and play, backtest theories and strategies, even if it takes months or a few quarters. Assemble your own set of stocks and bonds to purchase, if you feel you need the diversification.The credit or shame will be yours and yours alone to bear. Take responsibility for your own money and your own actions. Your Dow Will Never Jones.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 833752, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 8:29:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement