Eagle Remains at Full Steam Ahead

Judging by the disturbingly cautious outlook of Diana Shipping (NYSE: DSX  ) President Anastassis Margaronis; DryShips' (Nasdaq: DRYS  ) patience-snapping move to raise capital through yet another equity offering; a 10% cancellation of worldwide orders for new bulk vessels; and a still-languishing Baltic Dry Index, the dry bulk shipping sector finds itself operating in an ever-shrinking pond. Which makes now a particularly odd time for any shipper to launch a massive expansion of its fleet.

The impressive earnings Eagle Bulk Shipping (Nasdaq: EGLE  ) released late last week would seem to suggest clear sailing ahead -- but only if we ignored the broader context. On the strength of a 30% fleet expansion as the company's bold new building program gets under way, revenue surged 53%, and earnings rose 20%. From an operational standpoint, Eagle continues to perform well under adverse market conditions, although a number of vessel charters will expire during 2009, thus becoming subject to the prevailing weak hire rates.

While Eagle keeps the growth throttle pressed forward, this Fool is altering course. Back in March, I added Eagle Bulk Shipping to my short list of lower-risk operators with which to ride out this epic storm. But as the outlook grows clearer, Eagle's risk profile appears to be rising. With advances of $382 million already paid for the new building program, which thankfully was pared back from 35 to 27 vessels, Eagle has a deadweight ton riding on this growth spurt. Given the somber warning from Diana's management about excess capacity, and my reconstituted expectation of major bankruptcies and credit contraction looming over the sector, I am no longer comfortable with Eagle's enthusiastic fleet expansion.

True, all but three of the 22 undelivered vessels have already been hired, which somewhat offsets my concerns. But until I see hard evidence of a real rebound for commodity demand, I cannot steer Fools toward any company engaging in such a counter-cyclical growth spurt. With more than $800 million borrowed against the company's $1.35 billion credit facility, Eagle remains unattractively leveraged against a book value of less than $500 million and a market capitalization less than $350 million. Meanwhile, Navios Maritime Holdings (NYSE: NM  ) and Genco Shipping (NYSE: GNK  ) both have some of the enormous Capesize vessels on order, but each maintains a far more favorable liquidity position.

Dry bulk shipping remains a battle for survival first and foremost. I remain convinced that Diana Shipping and Navios Maritime Holdings are among the most seaworthy operators, and would consider Genco Shipping at my number three spot. I now add Eagle Bulk Shipping to my Foolish caution list, along with DryShips and Excel Maritime Carriers (NYSE: EXM  ) .

Further Foolishness:

The "Dry Bulk Shipping" tag within Motley Fool CAPS lists 16 companies. Join our online community today and share your views on the offerings in this sector. CAPS is free and fun!

Fool contributor Christopher Barker captains yachts somewhat smaller than dry bulk carriers. He can be found blogging actively and acting Foolishly within the CAPS community under the username TMFSinchiruna. He owns shares of Diana Shipping. The Motley Fool has a seaworthy disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (16)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2009, at 4:06 PM, stockjock43 wrote:

    Im sick of hearing about your NM and GNK plays....

    all shippers suck except FRO and NAT ...they are all either losing their asses or GOing TO lose their arses,,,, say it like it is.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2009, at 4:41 PM, silverminer wrote:

    I didn't know these shippers even kept donkeys. :)

    It is completely unfeasible for all shippers to fail, since the commodities they carry include basic necessity items like grain and thermal coal. Some will survive, and I will continue to highlight the best-positioned operators despite the severity of the intermediate-term

    outlook.

    I think any look back through my articles will find I haven't exactly been bullish on the sector. :)

    Fool on!

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2009, at 5:19 PM, blaueskobalt wrote:

    Have you taken a look at StarBulk (SBLK)? Although their balance sheet is not nearly as pretty as Diana's, they look to have enough good charter coverage for the next two years to handily manage their debt, and their pricing is much more attractive. I guess there is extra risk in how new they are, but still...thoughts?

  • Report this Comment On May 14, 2009, at 7:13 PM, LVENVY wrote:

    So now it's 3 days later and commodities have exploded. Eagle still needs less than 10K a day to weather "storms".

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 896487, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 2:59:05 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement