You Can Correct an Outrage

Recs

10

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

Let me see if I can get you steaming mad, and then proceed to tell you how you might improve the situation. Think back to the last time you checked your mail and found an annual report and proxy statement, soliciting your vote on some important matters. As you know, you can vote for or against most items -- things like approving auditors, endorsing board-of-director candidates, or supporting various management and shareholder proposals -- or you can abstain.

You've also probably noticed that management will include an explanation of the various proposals, including those suggested by shareholders, along with their own view on the matter and their recommendation. So if there's a proposal for shareholders to have a say on executive pay, you might find management's strenuous explanation of why it's unnecessary, followed by a recommendation that you vote against it.

Here's the crazy part, though: If you send in your ballot without voting on a particular proposal, and without even formally abstaining, you might reasonably assume that your vote will be taken as an abstention. But no -- with such ballots, a vote left blank is generally cast with management. So you'll end up voting against the shareholder proposal, when you never meant to do that.

Change in the air
There has been movement recently to try and change this. One change is a petition to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to amend the related rule so that blank votes are counted as abstentions. The SEC is collecting comments on this suggestion, so I invite you to let your voice be heard. Read about the petition here (click on May 15th's File 4-583) and email your comments (being sure to include "File 4-583" in the subject field) to rule-comments@sec.gov.

It's just the latest in recent news from annual meetings that shows how shareholders are taking a more active role in the companies they own. Shareholders at Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) recently passed say-on-pay proposals, while Verizon (NYSE: VZ) shareholders exercised the right they earned two years ago to approve the company's executive compensation.

Nevertheless, there's still work to do. Similar say-on-pay proposals failed to pass at Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), Windstream (NYSE: WIN), and Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q). You can expect to see many rejected proposals reappear in future years.

Learn more about shareholder activism:

And check out our Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter, too, as it looks for shareholder-friendly investments. A free trial will give you full access to all recommendations.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Apple and Johnson & Johnson. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. Pfizer is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Johnson & Johnson and Windstream are Motley Fool Income Investor selections. Try our investing newsletters free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 29, 2009, at 2:22 PM, chuck245 wrote:

    Better yet if you're too stupid to read something and know what your signing--DON"T. Get help!

  • Report this Comment On June 01, 2009, at 2:23 PM, corpgov wrote:

    The blank vote petition is focused at those who vote online. Most people would expect that if you leave blanks the next screen would contain a bold-face warning that blank votes will be cast for management. In fact, that's what the SEC rules appear to require. However, when you vote online the next screen shows tiny asterisks and one small footnote explaining that your votes are being changed. The petition requests the SEC to require that blank votes be left blank and that the screen prior to final submission warn users of the items left blank.

    I'm flabbergasted that chuck245 appears to oppose the petition... or maybe he just didn't read it. What could be more American than not allowing someone else to take your vote? I would think the only

  • Report this Comment On June 01, 2009, at 2:25 PM, corpgov wrote:

    I would think the only ones opposing the petition would be managers and directors who are afraid of losing unless they can rob shareowners of their (blank) votes.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 909541, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 9:21:54 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $60.30 Up +0.32 +0.53%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
PFE $16.96 Down -0.06 -0.35%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
WIN $10.28 Up +0.10 +0.98%
Windstream Corp CAPS Rating: ****
Q $3.62 Up +0.01 +0.28%
Qwest Communicatio… CAPS Rating: **
VZ $29.56 Up +0.25 +0.85%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $194.34 Up +0.31 +0.16%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
CMCSA $14.59 Up +0.39 +2.75%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Price to book ratio: The price to book ratio (a.k.a. P/B) is the market capitalization divided by the amount of shareholder's equity.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!