Recs

25

5 Deathbed Stocks?

We've all heard of the "death rattle," the last gasp from a lost soul's lungs. Sometimes, we seem to hear it from the companies in which we invest. Revenue dries up. Margins contract. Profits evaporate. All these signs suggest that a company's condition is worsening -- a financial death rattle, if you will.

Stocks in sickbay
Don't assume that all such companies are goners. Some will barely cling to life, while others will make a full recovery. Here, however, we're seeking companies that have all but given up the ghost.

For help, we'll turn to the clever coroners at our 135,000-strong Motley Fool CAPS community, where members give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down to some 5,300 stocks. We've unearthed a handful of stocks that our CAPS members think might be headed for the hereafter, based on their rock-bottom one-star ratings.

Then we'll check their pulse with some quick tests for liquidity. The current ratio and quick ratio (also called the "acid test" ratio) give us an idea of a company's ability to pay its bills, and the Altman Z-Score suggests companies in danger of bankruptcy. Companies scoring 3.00 and above are considered safe, between 2.70 and 2.99 are "yellow flags," between 1.80 and 2.70 have a good chance of going bankrupt within two years, and those with scores below 1.80 could be doomed.

Here's today's list. The question is, which of these companies have a chance?

Stock

CAPS Rating

Current Ratio

Acid-Test Ratio

Altman Z-Score

Recent Price

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: BCRX  )

*

4.8

4.7

(2.51)

$4.00

Developers Diversified Realty (NYSE: DDR  )

*

1.3

0.5

NA

$4.99

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (Nasdaq: GMCR  )

*

1.8

0.8

6.84

$84.52

MBIA (NYSE: MBI  )

*

1.4

1.1

NA

$6.59

Utek

*

2.3

2.0

3.10

$5.30

Sources: Motley Fool CAPS; Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Obviously, we don't know for sure what will happen to these companies, so don't short them simply based on their appearance here. Some of them, like Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, have some attractive traits. Moreover, companies in some industries don't neatly fit into the Altman Z-Score scale. Yet our primary criteria for the screen remains a one-star rating from Motley Fool CAPS, which signifies that a stock may be destined to seriously underperform the market. General Motors, after appearing here a year ago, finally succumbed to bankruptcy this past Monday.

Back from the grave
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals isn't alone in earning low ratings from the CAPS community. Quite a few biotechs, including Hemispherx Biopharma (AMEX: HEB  ) , Novavax (Nasdaq: NVAX  ) , and Vanda Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: VNDA  ) also sport one-star ratings, and Hemispherx and Novavax feature Z-Scores that would also indicate they're on the verge of oblivion. Novavax took a trip to the ICU just last month.

But the 239 companies in the CAPS biotech sector as a whole sport an average three-star rating, and they've enjoyed returns of better than 34% over the past 30 days. Vanda's up more than 1,000%, Hemispherix has more than quintupled, and you'll find a number of other biotech names populating the list of top-performing stocks these days.

That good news stems from a variety of reasons. Vanda shook the market when its schizophrenia drug Fanapt got FDA approval, and Novavax got a lift from the swine flu outbreak. Meanwhile, Hemispherix is still waiting for FDA approval of its chronic fatigue syndrome treatment Ampligen, but that hasn't stopped speculators from bidding up the shares anyway.

Meanwhile, CAPS member PDTBiotech thinks BioCryst is just getting a free ride from all of the activity others in the sector have been getting, and that its flu drug peramivir is unlikely to amount to much.

As has been the case with other flu drugs, you don't have to be a great drug to make money off a pandemic scare. In fact, you don't even have to be on the market. Just be good enough to convince people you've got a shot and your shares will go up....

Peramivir has also shown activity against regular ol' influenza yet it's still not on the market, as the activity wasn't high enough to support approval. ... It seems like it would be quite insane (but not impossible) for this drug to not be good enough to work on regular flu, then suddenly to have a new strain emerge which it does work on right when the drug seems to be at the inflection point for failure. This seems to be what investors who have bought into BCRX think has happened, but it's probably more likely that they don't realize the history of this company's failures with this drug.

Rattling the cage
We'll be back next time to identify more stocks that are leaving investors chilled to the bone. In the meantime, it pays to start your own research on these stocks on Motley Fool CAPS. Read a company's financial reports, scrutinize key data and charts, and examine the comments your fellow investors have made, all from a stock's CAPS page. Sign up today, absolutely free, and let us know whether you think a stock is headed for its demise.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey does not have a financial interest in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy remains vibrant and full of life.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 04, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Erythrite wrote:

    You guys must be short a lot of HEB shares. The stock keeps going up and day after day you keep putting out negative PR's. Maybe you should try doing some actualy research on the company's you PR on. What a bunch of unprofessioanl losers.

  • Report this Comment On June 04, 2009, at 5:16 PM, JM5555 wrote:

    Wow, talk about putting down the winners, are you jokers for real? NVAX just put in a 74% run today on huge news of swine flu. Listen, the news is out there, please do some due diligence first, these rags of yours just go to prove who the clowns are..

  • Report this Comment On June 04, 2009, at 5:26 PM, CHECKPLS wrote:

    I love it when the "experts" flush stocks I like. HEB and XTNT payed my bills for the month today. Thx "FOOLS".

  • Report this Comment On June 04, 2009, at 7:06 PM, motleydbags wrote:

    Wow, are you guys serious?? Who pays you to write such useless articles? Do you even make minimum wage?? Maybe you should do a bit more DD before you put out such under-researched garbage. HEB is up on flu-related news, does your article say that at all? Nope. Enjoy your mediocre lifestyles and try to make money in a more respectable way, d-bags!!

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 7:18 AM, TMFMarlowe wrote:

    Not even in SBUX's most secret fantasies is GMCR a "deathbed" stock. It just arguably got a little ahead of itself after more than doubling in 3 months, and CAPS folks seem to think it's due for a pullback. Very strange choice for this article.

    (disclosure: yes, I'm long GMCR)

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 2:49 PM, BIGJIMT wrote:

    Here is a stock than has been in intensive care for past 2 years, "MRNA". aND RECENTLY MADE TO PARTNERING DEALS WHICH WAS NEEDED BEFORE GOING BANKRUPT FOR SURE.

    But sales are not improving, Burn rate not under control yet, Debt is ever present, and they are a pre-clinical sstage company soley looking just for partnering.

    So doesn't this qualify 'MRNA' as one of the death bed stocks.

    I am waiting for a writer with a reputation, to have the courage to address 'MRNA' and write their honest perspective on this stock.

    Feb.2009 stock price was $.14 cents

    May 19th stock was $1.99

    June 5th at 2:26p.m. Real-Time: $1.33 -0.09 (6.34%) 2:28pm ET

    In my opinion this is the most hyped stock, the most channeled stock, the most munipulative stock,

    on the entire nasdaq market.

    FOREVER OVERBOUGHT/OVERSOLD WHILE THE STOCK VALUE IS ONLY $.10 CENTS.

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 3:58 PM, HB23 wrote:

    WHOOPS!

    ...er.... a negative number < -1 for the Altman Z-score??

    let's see:

    z-score = (1.2 a + 1.4 b + 3.3 c + d)/e + .6 f/g

    where :

    a = working capital,

    b = retained earnings,

    c = operating income,

    d = sales,

    e = total assets,

    f = net worth and

    g = total debt

    in order to get a negative number, you'd have to have that f is negative, and by a sufficient amount negative to cancel out the first term

    but!.... f cannot have an absolute value > g (at worst, you can have debt without any assets, to get f = g in size).

    therefore 0.6 f/g cannot ever be less than -0.6 for any company

    the first term cannot be less than 0, unless e is negative. But if e is negative or even just less than the numerator, the first term must be discarded to avoid nonsense numbers!

    Thus no Altman Z score can ever be < -0.6, right?

    Unless, you just don't understand the purpose of the equation, and misapply it.

    So the - 2.51 above only show someone has made at least one math error or doesn't even understand the equation at all.

    Most often, when someone makes a glaring error like this, they make additional errors.

    Therefore, we have to ignore all these Altman numbers above, since we don't know if they are done correctly.

    That just leaves the current ratio, and other indicators, which are quite good enough to tell us all we need to know about the solvency question.

  • Report this Comment On June 05, 2009, at 4:23 PM, tshk1221 wrote:

    GM had to go for bankruptcy because of double crunched credit market, not because of the numbers above. GM couldn't roll over and refinance their business loans. Furthermore, buyers of GM autos could not get auto loans.

    Can you analyze PG, too?

    PG's most recent balance sheet shows a current ratio of 0.67, a very dangerous level that's worse than DDR you listed. From financial analysis point of view, PG cannot meet its short-term obligations and payments. Is PG going to die soon? I don't think so.

  • Report this Comment On June 06, 2009, at 2:31 PM, HB23 wrote:

    re what I said about the discarding the "first term" in the Altman Z-score above, correct wording is if the denominator e is close to zero or negative the result is nonsensical. Of course, normally we'd use only positive "assets" so e cannot be negative, etc. etc., thus any Altman Z below -0.6 is impossible, etc. etc., thus the result for biocryst for instance is erroneous. etc.

  • Report this Comment On June 06, 2009, at 4:41 PM, vinthetoolman wrote:

    A letter posted on the web as early as Monday pre-market with copies sent to all major news networks worldwide in which investors will be taking on the SEC, FTC and the Office of the President challenging them to reply. It will cover possible stock manipulation and back door disbursement of profits, specific to recent activity of The Street.com and its contributors, namely Adam Feuerstein who was instrumental in using public media and the internet to transmit false reports on several Bio stocks. It should be known that price drop and hedge fund purchases mysteriously coincided with the drops and immediately followed the post articles on The Street.com website. Specific to the demand for a public reply is as follows: Why did monitoring agencies question the CEO of Hemispherx Bio (HEB) about the sudden rise in stock price 8 days ago, while when the stock experienced a loss at greater than that rise rate, did not question the "reporter" at The Street.com as to their involvement in possible short selling, hedge fund involvement and price manipulation. Ironically Jim Cramer has recently begun a formal "short selling" petition that he publicly touted on his Mad Money CNBC show. Is this a ploy to mask his own activity and those of his financial circles to hide behind? ( see video for reference http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRa0B34jM... The clips seemed to strike a sour tone to CNBC and many of the clips were removed. Is CNBC actively aware of background manipulation tactics used by The Street and many who are within their circles? Could it be very possible that stock manipulation goes further than the halls of wall street and those involved were able to get embedded deep into the SEC and FTC so that only the privileged who hide behind the “Freedom of Speech" clause can avoid prosecution? It is time that the oval office become more aware of issues that go further than the political sectors and begin cleaning house where it's needed. I say, yes, Mr. President, I will challenge you as well to reply to me via this board. Your platform is change; I myself voted for you and have no fear of making that public. I too see the future as one that requires change, and not only from the bottom up but also from the top down. My goal on Monday will be to make these challenges very public in whatever means it takes to achieve it. If it means that entities and individuals and The Street.com become the pinnacle of an in-depth investigation, so be it. It is owed to the American people for the President to become responsive to issues that make a difference to all people in America, regardless of class, celebrity status, or political affiliation. To this end, I will see that this exercise does not fall on deaf ears and mark my words, these events will be investigated and should Adam Feuerstein or Mr. Cramer be found guilty of any charges on a federal level it would be incumbent on all who have experienced financial losses to bring charges against these same individuals and the vehicles of media they are employed by, specifically NBC, GE (Owner of NBC and its affiliates. This notion is made on the basis that enough posts were made on this and other financial boards to make it so that CNBC and other management of NBC affiliated media sources were apprised of possible illegal movement within their organization and if it was not addressed or can be proved to have been addressed, that NBC and its owners and affiliates will be held liable for the compensation of all losses to shareholders and be held accountable for and not limited to criminal and civil penalties. Copy it to as many of the boards or media that you are associated with on or before Monday. Thank you all in advance for your support and hope that we can begin to rid Wall street of criminals who are at the forefront of the corruption that helped put the United States in the unwanted financial crisis we are all experiencing.

  • Report this Comment On June 08, 2009, at 4:44 PM, TMFGebinr wrote:

    Hi HB23,

    It is possible for a company to have a negative Altman-Z score, and by quite a bit. If retained earnings and/or EBIT is negative -- by enough -- the Altman-Z score will be negative. And for BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, both retained earnings and EBIT are negative.

    Rich quotes Capital IQ as his source and this is the calculation (http://www.investopedia.com/articles/fundamental/04/021104.a... for that company according to them:

    1.2 * (Work Cap / Tot Assets) + 1.4 * (Retained Earn / Tot Assets) + 3.3 * (EBIT / Tot Assets) + 0.6 * (Avg mkt cap / Tot Liab) + (Tot Rev / Tot Assets)

    1.2 * (51.57 / 72.60) + 1.4 * (-258.56 / 72.60) + 3.3 * (-22.54 / 72.60) + 0.6 * (113.47 / 34.09) + (50.15 / 72.60) = -2.47

    Hope that explains the negative Altman-Z score.

    Jim Mueller, Fool editor

  • Report this Comment On June 11, 2009, at 1:10 PM, RnchrNTex wrote:

    And you fools wonder why i opted out of your service? Your articles like this one and your constant bashing of Microsoft are why.

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2009, at 6:54 PM, SuperAlexCA wrote:

    @vinthetoolman this might also interest you on Adam Feuerstein http://www.favstocks.com/thestreet-com-inc-booted-off-russel...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 913988, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 6:52:12 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
BCRX $3.26 Down +0.00 +0.00%
BioCryst Pharmaceu… CAPS Rating: *
MBI $8.44 Down -0.06 -0.71%
MBIA, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
NVAX $1.27 Up +0.02 +1.60%
Novavax, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
VNDA $4.18 Down -0.02 -0.48%
Vanda Pharmaceutic… CAPS Rating: **
DDR $13.89 Down -0.11 -0.79%
DDR Corp. CAPS Rating: *
GMCR $25.31 Up +0.22 +0.88%
Green Mountain Cof… CAPS Rating: **
HEB $0.27 Down +0.00 -0.99%
Hemispherx BioPhar… CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement