Starbucks Gets Back to Nature

Recs

10

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) just announced plans to upgrade many of its ingredients. While that's a nice angle, I'm not convinced it'll make much of a strategic difference for the coffee giant.

The company touted the addition of premium ingredients such as whole bananas, Oregon blueberries, and Michigan cherries to its offerings, so that its food can become "more as nature intended." Starbucks also recently decided to ditch high-fructose corn syrup from its food (a move that may cheer most consumers, but could incite the ire of the Children of the Corn). Will going au naturel to differentiate its brand help the ailing coffee giant?

All-natural fare at Starbucks certainly makes sense -- but what took so long? Whole Foods Market (Nasdaq: WFMI) has always focused on the natural and organic marketplace to differentiate itself from more conventional rivals. I thought Starbucks was shrewd to convert some of its stores into eco-friendly, locally oriented venues, but like its new shift toward higher-quality fare, that idea should have been a no-brainer from the start.

Among shareholders, a move toward upscale ingredients doesn't always garner resounding approval. While Chipotle (NYSE: CMG) (NYSE: CMG-B) focuses on "food with integrity," seeking high-quality natural and organic ingredients, its management reports that many customers don't realize that its burritos' fancy ingredients are crucial to their overall tastiness.

And Starbucks is hardly breaking new ground with its all-natural approach. Last summer, the company took on Jamba Juice (Nasdaq: JMBA) with its Vivanno smoothies, and it's long offered light versions of its drinks for the diet-conscious.

I shouldn't complain too much, though; differentiation is better than flat-out copying the competition, especially on low-margin products that conflict with Starbucks' core high-end brand. I've been left cringing at too many of Starbucks' recent initiatives, which have made the java juggernaut look more like McDonald's (NYSE: MCD) than its former distinctive, high-class self. Value meals? Dollar items? Yikes. What next -- an Espresso Gordita Crunch to compete with YUM! Brands' (NYSE: YUM) Taco Bell?

Starbucks' "back to nature" approach isn't a bad idea -- but it's not particularly exciting, either. Alas, our current economic woes make this a particularly tricky time for any company to take a risk on innovative efforts. If, like me, you're hoping for a daring renaissance from Starbucks, you may be in for a long wait.

Take a sip of further Foolishness:

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Starbucks and Whole Foods Market are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Starbucks is also an Inside Value recommendation. Chipotle Mexican Grill is a Rule Breakers and Motley Fool Hidden Gems pick. The Fool owns shares of Chipotle and Starbucks. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Alyce Lomax owns shares of Starbucks and Whole Foods Market. The Fool's disclosure policy is waiting for its Cheesy Burrito Latte.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 01, 2009, at 10:46 AM, pumba2003 wrote:

    Ms. Lomax fails to mention that Starbucks is answering a concern of the consumer, and that the company isn't one to rush products to market without forethought--at least since Tiazzi and Chantico! All these "expert" analysts complain that the company doesn't attract new customers by filling their needs (customers want value during a down economy), and when Starbucks addresses that need, it's criticzed for the move claiming that it's betraying its premium image.

    What the company is doing is working both ends--use quality ingrediants you can trust--not mysterious Chinese powdered milk base McDonalds uses in their "handcrafted" mechano-lattes--while holding the line on price.

    Are more healthy food offerings sexy--no, but it's the right thing to do. Is it unusual for a company called Whole Foods to embrace natural foods from day one? Duh......

    Starbucks has approximately 100000 stores in the U.S. You want to be sure that when you roll out a new food program, you do it right!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 931794, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 2:07:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:01 PM
CMG-B $85.27 Up +0.79 +0.94%
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN G… CAPS Rating: *****
WFMI $28.25 Up +1.15 +4.24%
Whole Foods Market… CAPS Rating: **
MCD $61.72 Up +0.24 +0.39%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
SBUX $21.12 Up +1.42 +7.21%
Starbucks Corp CAPS Rating: **
JMBA $1.62 Up +0.02 +1.25%
JAMBA, INC. CAPS Rating: *****
YUM $35.23 Up +0.43 +1.24%
Yum! Brands, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
CMG $86.45 Up +0.59 +0.69%
Chipotle Mexican G… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Listing requirements: Listing requirements are criteria a stock must meet in order to be traded on an exchange such as NYSE, Nasdaq, or AMEX. Each exchange sets its own requirements and failure to meet them can result in removal.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!