The Commodities Correlation Conundrum

Recs

9

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

Earlier this month, while suggesting that Fools not go overboard with energy equities, I voiced my concern that oil and the stock market were becoming uncomfortably correlated. This suggested to me that price signals were breaking down, and that poor capital allocation decisions would be made as a result.

My comments on correlation were based on simple observation of day-to-day market behavior, and I didn't have any hard numbers for you. Bloomberg has since performed a study that confirms my hunch.

Based on percentage changes over a trailing 60-day period, correlations between the S&P 500 and the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index (a basket of various commodities) hit a high of 0.74 this month. That's the tightest correlation seen in at least 50 years. The correlation between stocks and crude oil alone also topped 0.7 (or 70% in percentage terms).

It made a good bit of sense for assets of all sorts to move in tandem when the market tanked. From ordinary investors to executives at companies like Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK) and Denbury Resources (NYSE: DNR) to overleveraged hedge funds, margin calls forced many folks to sell whatever wasn't nailed down. Even gold -- both the futures and the SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD) ETF -- took a nosedive back in October. While the markets were plenty rattled about fundamentals at the time, this was as much a liquidity event as anything else.

The recent pile-on in equities, commodities, and emerging markets -- through both individual securities and exchange-traded funds like the U.S. Natural Gas Fund (NYSE: UNG) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (NYSE: EEM) ETF -- shows an almost comparable lack of discrimination, save for an apparent appetite for junk stocks over quality.

While the indiscriminate selling was forced to some degree, nothing's compelling today's purchases, other than perhaps a desperation to claw back some of 2008's massive losses. From an institutional money manager's point of view, perhaps the only thing worse than losing half your clients' money would be to do so and then sit out the ensuing rally. You'd lose even more of your assets under management, and maybe even your job.

In gambling, the attempt to win back losses is called "chasing." There's more than a bit of that happening in the markets today, and it makes this Fool extremely uneasy.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. Check out his CAPS profile or follow his articles using Twitter or RSS. Chesapeake Energy is an Inside Value selection. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 01, 2009, at 5:07 AM, shanelevy wrote:

    Great post. I love how it didn't end in a sales pitch :)

  • Report this Comment On July 01, 2009, at 11:00 AM, oilgasguru2 wrote:

    Natural Gas prices have taken a severe and unrealistic beating. Analyst charting suggests crude and natural gas to peak around August of this year with crude leading the pack. Crude has already taken on quite an advance. We are stocking up on natural gas stocks over oil because of their current indicators and suggest UNG as our portfolio play for the next three months with a price target of $18.23 .

  • Report this Comment On July 08, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Dierj wrote:

    I question how UNG can go to $18 based on extremely high inventoriesof NG and a projected decline in consumption thru 2010

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 931952, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 1:24:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:01 PM
CHK $24.22 Down -0.60 -2.42%
Chesapeake Energy… CAPS Rating: *****
DNR $12.85 Down -0.09 -0.70%
Denbury Resources,… CAPS Rating: *****
EEM $39.65 Down -0.05 -0.13%
iShares MSCI Emerg… CAPS Rating: ****
GLD $107.43 Up +0.45 +0.42%
SPDR Gold Trust (E… CAPS Rating: ***
UNG $9.53 Down -0.33 -3.35%
United States Natu… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Write-off: A write-off is a non-cash expense that reduces the value of an asset, usually inventory, on the balance sheet.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!