Recs

15

5 Energy Stocks for the Future

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Wishing may be a viable strategy in kids' movies, but on Wall Street, it's a dud. We too often tend to invest on wishful thinking, even when the odds tell us that the scenario for which we're hoping likely won't come to pass. Witness alternative energy. As each new technology arises, investors pounce, hoping that this time, they've found the green, renewable solution that will free us from oil, coal, and other CO2-spewing fuels.

Misplaced wishes
Remember corn-based ethanol's promise to free the United States from foreign-oil bondage while simultaneously lowering greenhouse-gas admissions? It sounded like Nirvana ... except that Nirvana had to be fortified with a $0.45-per-gallon tax credit for all ethanol, and a $0.54-per-gallon tariff and 2.5% ad valorem tax on the imported stuff. Domestic ethanol's sails were further trimmed by Congressional mandates requiring yearly increases for blended gasoline to top out at 15 billion gallons of ethanol by 2015, up from 10.5 billion gallons in 2009.

I'm not sure anything more could have been done to guarantee ethanol's success. Nevertheless, the fuel's proven as lucrative for investors as Beanie Babies have been to collectors: 

Company

5-Year High Price

Current Price

Percent Loss

Green Plains Renewable Energy

$53.68 (April 2006)

$7.26

86%

Verenium (Nasdaq: VRNMD  )

$149.28 (February 2007)

$7.14

95%

Pacific Ethanol (Nasdaq: PEIX  )

$44.50 (May 2006)

$0.50

99%

Source: Yahoo! Finance. Verenium executed a 1:12 reverse stock split, and its five-year price was adjusted accordingly.

Ethanol failed to grant many people's wishes -- but perhaps wind will be different. Perhaps it can do to coal, which fires 45% of the nation's electric power, what ethanol was supposed to do to oil. 

At first blush, the numbers are intriguing: According to the U.S. Department of Energy, rates for wind-generated electricity installed today are comparable to conventional wholesale electric power prices of $0.025 to $0.035 per kWh. Alas, when subsidies are stripped away, the price of wind power jumps considerably higher.

The ugly investable reality
Face it: Coal and oil are here to stay. To quote the World Energy Outlook 2008 Edition's executive summary: "Fossil fuels account for 80% of the world's primary energy mix in 2030 -- down only slightly on today. Oil remains the dominant fuel, though demand for coal rises more than any other fuel."

The cost of subsidies and mandates is another reality. When government grants a subsidy, it loses revenue, something the federal government is hardly well-positioned to forgo these days. The White House predicts that the U.S. federal deficit will grow to $1.6 trillion in the current fiscal year, while upping the 10-year tally of deficits to $9.1 trillion, bringing it in line with the Congressional Budget Office estimates. 

Green energy is only adding to the red ink. This year's massive stimulus package earmarked $39 billion for the Department of Energy, and contained an additional $20 billion in tax incentives for clean energy projects. And let's not dismiss the president's campaign promise to spend $150 billion over 10 years to develop new energy technologies. How much more can we afford?

The reality is that that big energy requirements demand "black energy," and a lot of it. Black energy, in turn, demands big companies offering economies of scale, while providing a buttress against volatility. The following fossil fuel firms are the biggest domestic coal and oil producers by market capitalization. They're well-cushioned (all endured the depressed energy market in that prevailed in the early 2000s), and conservatively capitalized (none has a debt-to-equity ratio above one). In addition, they all pay and grow dividends and will likely continue based on current payout ratios:

Company

Market Cap

Debt-to-Equity Ratios

5-Year Dividend Growth Rates

Dividend Payout Ratio

 

Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU  )

$9.8 billion

77.51%

16.36%

7.28%

 

CONSOL Energy (NYSE: CNX  )

$7.5 billion

53.47%

7.39%

12.60%

 

Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI  )

$3.1 billion

82.45%

24.21%

29.28%

 

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  )

$336 billion

8.70%

9.60%

26.01%

 

Chevron (NYSE: CVX  )

$142 billion

13.71%

12.09%

31.95%

 

Sources: Capital IQ (a division of Standard and Poor's) and Reuters.

Wishing is a harmless exercise, as long as it doesn't conflict with the reality of investing. We might wish that we had a cleaner, cheaper mass-energy source, but in reality, we currently don't. Old-school fossil fuels are the reality, and no amount of wishful thinking will change that. Invest accordingly.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor Stephen Mauzy, CFA, holds no positions in the stocks mentioned. He's the author of the upcoming book The Wealth Portfolio, available this fall. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2009, at 10:42 AM, 1dms wrote:

    subsidies to coal and oil and nuclear are considerable. If you add it all up renewables are already cheaper. What they lack is a large enough constituancy, political power/campaign donations.

  • Report this Comment On September 16, 2009, at 9:47 AM, jec00702 wrote:

    No matter what happens in the future. Oil is not renewable or clean. And we will have to find alternative sources of energy if for nothing else but the cars we drive to work every day. This is an economic an political certainty which will occur in our lifetime. Our dependence on fuel is a terrible hamstring for our economic growth and future prosperity, and someone in the very near future IS going to get the formula correct for making money and being renewable. Most of what is going on with oil and gas now is greed and short sightedness winning over sense and long term success.

  • Report this Comment On September 16, 2009, at 7:48 PM, vincencio wrote:

    According to the economist Dr. Michael L Angelotti This is the time to take positions on alternative energy stocks , including Solar-wind and Ethanol.

    Dr. Angelotti stated that buying penny stocks with more than decent fundamentals associated with good technical analisis and some parameters taking into considerations will be a solid signal for a strong buy.

    And as he mention,, There its not better time to act than Now.

    He also stated that he's now recomending a few great companies on the energy sector trading at this time over 1000% below from their future price in about three years from now, perhaps sooner.

  • Report this Comment On September 17, 2009, at 10:30 AM, flymikefly04 wrote:

    Alternative energy today sounds a lot like the promises of solar energy in the 70's. Lot's of hype, no hope. While I think that some sort of alternative energy will be part of our energy solution, I do not see these alternative energy sources (wind, ethanol) solving any of our energy solutions in my investment lifetime.

  • Report this Comment On September 18, 2009, at 12:43 PM, gladnfoolish wrote:

    If every road in the USA was a toll road, we'd all be crying like babies over the cost, but, wait, there is the interstate system-that many of us forget was really called the "defense highway" system so we could dip into budgets that had nothing to do with roads and pay for it. Until such a cash pot switch-a-roo is pulled off we are probably stuck with black energy. If the govt bites the bullet for us, perhaps we all ultimately like it as the memory of government control becomes faded by speeding along with our batteries recently recharged off the good old taxpayer built wind mill grid. The other option would be something akin to a race to make alternatives commercially viable, the race contestants drawn from among the current crop of big oil and utilities, by really putting it on the line-whoever gets there first operates with an exclusive patent and totally tax free for 50 years-I bet you'd have a solution in 5 years.

  • Report this Comment On September 18, 2009, at 2:09 PM, wheelie100 wrote:

    Wind and Solar will NOT provide all of our energy needs at the current state of the art (and may never). The necessary cheap energy storage has not materialized to offset it's intermittent nature. That, plus no one wants large windfarms or power lines near them (see US Chamber of Commerce's website "Project 'No Project'").

    Coal, petroleum and especially nuclear will be with us for a long time unless we are willing to buy electricity at many multiples of our present kW-hr rates (see German and Danish electric rates). Home cogeneration systems stand a chance, but they are still cost prohibitive (see Honda's Freewatt system). Finally, good luck regulating a carbon market - that's an area ripe for fraud and price fixing.

  • Report this Comment On September 18, 2009, at 9:28 PM, GoNuke wrote:

    Public protests will kill each individual proposed new coal plant, therefore, demand for coal can't grow. Eventually we will be forced to build a large number of small nuclear plants -waiting to see if expensive wind power can deliver. Small plants like the ones developed at Sandia Labs can be up and running in 2 years and provide enough power for a small city. Most of the "plant" can be fabricated in a factory.

    China and India will continue to expand coal fired power generation but "not in my backyard" politics will prevent growth in demand for coal in the US.

  • Report this Comment On September 21, 2009, at 4:17 PM, wheelie100 wrote:

    Based on what little I've seen, windpower in large commercial on-shore farms will get as much opposition as coal fired plants. Even off-shore facilities have been successfully defeated (like the one near Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket). Each time, the opposition says they are for wind, but just not here. Well, where SHOULD we put them?

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2009, at 6:08 PM, aja1946 wrote:

    It makes very angry to see the lack of insight and sensitivity that many people have about green energies. I guess this is a problem of education, and the author of this article may need to come back to school. To abandon fossil fuels is not an OPTION it´s a NECESSITY.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 984502, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/15/2012 4:18:57 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,878.28 4.24 0.03%
S&P 500 1,350.50 -1.27 -0.09%
NASD 2,931.83 0.44 0.02%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 4:00 PM
CVX $106.49 Up +0.11 +0.10%
Chevron Corp CAPS Rating: *****
PEIX $1.10 Down -0.06 -5.17%
Pacific Ethanol, I… CAPS Rating: *
XOM $84.67 Up +0.25 +0.30%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
ACI $13.56 Down -0.30 -2.16%
Arch Coal, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
BTU $34.67 Down -1.29 -3.59%
Peabody Energy Cor… CAPS Rating: ****
CNX $35.84 Down +0.00 +0.00%
CONSOL Energy, Inc… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement