Get Ready for a 25% Drop

Recs

9

My friend swears he's learned his lesson.

Back in July 1995, this friend -- let's call him Charlie -- bought Microsoft at what turned out to be the highest price it would see that year. The stock was down 15% in no time, and Charlie was worried. He was smart enough to know the market is the best wealth-creating machine available to us regular folks, but stocks to him were sort of like husbands to Elizabeth Taylor. He liked them well enough, but he tended to give up when things got a little rocky.

In a matter of weeks his paper loss was approaching 25%, and he couldn't stand it anymore. He bailed out.

Needless to say, the next few years were even rougher on Charlie as he watched Mr. Softy march steadily higher. It achieved 10-bagger status at the height of the bull market in 2000, but even today it's more than 270% higher than when he sold.

Get ready for a 25% drop
As Tom and David Gardner tell their Motley Fool Stock Advisor members, you have to expect significant dips from some of your stocks, and you must remain firm if you've done your homework. Otherwise, you sort of screw up that legendary investing formula by buying high and selling low.

This table should really drive home the point for you. These are true all-star performers from the past decade, yet investors who bailed out on them missed out on some big gains.

Company

10-Year Gain

Largest Drop

Simon Property Group (NYSE: SPG)

216%

(70%)

Whole Foods (Nasdaq: WFMI)

312%

(87%)

Cree (Nasdaq: CREE)

113%

          (88%)

Capitol Federal Financial (Nasdaq: CFFN)

228%

(33%)

Walter Energy (NYSE: WLT)

853%

(83%)

Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (NYSE: POT)

1,009%

(70%)

ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP)

378%

(49%)

So, the lesson Charlie learned is that practically all of the great performers of the past decades have dropped at least 25% at one time or another. It will be very hard for you to find one that hasn't.

Hey, I'll be the first to admit that many stocks drop 25% and keep dropping. That can happen when a business that has no real competitive advantages to begin with gets the rug pulled out from under it. It happened to me several years ago, and like a shell-shocked boxer, I still duck when I hear the name CMGI.

Lesson learned
We've all learned some things throughout the years. But if, as Tom Gardner says, you can invest for decades, add money to your existing holdings steadily over time, and stay committed to focusing on truly great businesses, you stand to make a fortune.

For the seven years since Stock Advisor was launched, the Gardners' recommendations are beating the S&P 500 by an average of 50% each. Interested in finding out which stocks to start with? Try a no-obligation 30-day free trial and you'll see Tom and David's five best buys for new money now. Here's more information.

This article was originally published on Jan. 8, 2007. It has been updated.

Rex Moore lathers and rinses, but never repeats. Of the companies mentioned in this article, he owns shares of Microsoft. Microsoft is an Inside Value recommendation. Whole Foods Market is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 3:03 AM, lotontech wrote:

    Just to play Devil's Advocate here:

    In an alternative scenario Charlie could have sold at minus 15%, and bought in again at minus 25%, for an even better final outcome.

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 11:35 AM, mtd1nc06 wrote:

    This article seems pointless. Why was it recycled with some updated stocks and a new shocker headline begging to be clicked?

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 11:45 AM, wuff3t wrote:

    "In an alternative scenario Charlie could have sold at minus 15%, and bought in again at minus 25%, for an even better final outcome..."

    How would he have known when to do that? How would he have known that 25% was a "bottom"? If he was too nervous to hold on at -15% why would he suddenly have found the courage to buy back in at -25%?

  • Report this Comment On October 16, 2009, at 3:34 PM, DarkOblivion000 wrote:

    Gees. Thought this article was gonna be about a W shaped recovery or coming market correction.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1008619, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 3:39:42 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:01 PM
WLT $69.83 Up +0.18 +0.26%
Walter Industries,… CAPS Rating: ****
CFFN $29.57 Down -0.04 -0.14%
Capitol Federal Fi… CAPS Rating: *
WFMI $26.36 Down -0.61 -2.26%
Whole Foods Market… CAPS Rating: ***
SPG $72.56 Down -1.35 -1.83%
Simon Property Gro… CAPS Rating: *
COP $52.08 Down -0.48 -0.91%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: *****
CREE $46.77 Up +0.05 +0.11%
Cree, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
POT $114.70 Up +1.53 +1.35%
Potash Corp./Saska… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Fed Model: The Fed Model (not endorsed by the Federal Reserve) hypothesizes that the market is in equilibrium when the earnings yield on the S&P 500 matches the yield on the 10 year Treasury note. Any dissonance in the relationship would show that equity valuations are out of whack.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!