The Redacted Ben Graham

Recs

12

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

There is a set of rules, set forth by the great value investor Ben Graham and his colleague James Rea, that comes as close to guaranteeing success as you could expect. If you can find stocks adhering to the Graham-Rea rules, buy ... and buy in bulk. The rules are as follows:

  1. An earnings-to-price yield of twice the triple-A bond. (If the triple-A bond is yielding 5.5%, the required earnings yield is 11%, or a price/earnings multiple of 9.1 or less.)
  2. A P/E ratio down to four-tenths of the highest average P/E ratio the stock attained in the most recent five years.
  3. A dividend yield of two-thirds the triple-A bond yield (or 3.67% today).
  4. A stock price down to two-thirds of tangible book value per share.
  5. A stock price down to two-thirds of net current asset value. (Current assets less total liabilities.)
  6. Total debt less than tangible book value.
  7. Current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) of two or more.
  8. Total debt equal or less than twice the net quick liquidation value as defined in rule five.
  9. Earnings growth of 7% compounded over the past 10 years (or a doubling of earnings over the past 10 years).
  10. No more than two years of declining earnings of 5% or more over the past 10 years.

If you're wary of buying in bulk, don't be; you're not going to buy in bulk. In fact, you're not going to buy at all, because stocks matching all 10 criteria are as rare as Washington Generals victories over the Harlem Globetrotters.

Why it won't work
Times change, and Graham's balance-sheet-centric notion of buying stock in firms where the intrinsic value of the assets far exceeds the market capitalization worked well in the depths of the Great Depression, when investors were averse to holding equity. Back in the days of ledger paper, mechanical adding machines, and thick Standard & Poor's manuals, Graham could find companies whose liquidation value offered a substantial "margin of safety."

Book value has become less useful in modernity. Persistent inflation means the historical cost of assets can bear only passing resemblance to their actual worth. Meanwhile, firms extract more and more of their value from intangible assets, like intellectual property or brands, that don't show up in the financial statements. Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), for example, gets much of its value not from physical equipment but from an indelible brand name built on relentless advertising.

Markets are also more efficient. Much of Graham's work was of the grinding number-crunching variety. Graham vetted company reports and painstakingly added and subtracted the numbers to determine a company's intrinsic value. Such effort would seem to offer no competitive advantage in today's information-saturated, microprocessed market.

Why it can work
Nevertheless, computers and databases -- albeit primitive compared to today's standards -- were available in later years to pick off Graham's low-hanging fruit, and they failed to pick them all. From 1974 to 1976, Graham manually researched the value of the 10 criteria to see what would have happened if an investor had employed them from 1925 to 1975. Graham's research found that the average stock selected using criterion 1 (low P/E ratio) and criterion 6 (with total debt less than market value of equity instead of book value) appreciated at an average annual rate of nearly 19% compounded (excluding dividends and commissions). The combination of criterion 3 (dividends) with criterion 6 worked nearly as well: 18.5%.

Graham's research suggests that an investor, using the three or four most important measures, can achieve success. Those four are criteria 1, 3, 5, and 6.

I screened using the simple criteria 1, 3, and 6 -- low P/E ratio, manageable debt, and investor cash flow -- and trailing data used in any free screening. I eliminated royalty trust companies -- real estate, oil, mortgage, or otherwise -- because most are simply pass-through entities where little value is added. A few names remained (or were pretty close), and, oddly enough, I find them appealing to my value-centric sensibilities.

Firm

Dividend Yield

Total Debt-to-Equity Ratio

P/E Multiple

Olin Corp (NYSE: OLN)

4.6%

0.8

8.2

Universal Corp (NYSE: UVV)

4.1%

1.1

7.9

International Shipping (NYSE: ISH)

5.6%

1.0

6.9

Advance America (NYSE: AEA)

3.9%

0.6

9.5

PDL BioPharma (Nasdaq: PDLI)

11.9%

0.5

5.4

Earthlink (Nasdaq: ELNK)

6.8%

0.4

6.9

You would think picking stocks based on such pedestrian, populist criteria would prove fruitless given the competition and everyone's access to the same information. Then again, perhaps successful investing is simply a matter of performing simple things well and using public knowledge intelligently. (To quote John Maynard Keynes: "The dealers on Wall Street could make huge fortunes if only they had no inside information.") Maybe that's the real secret behind the Ben Graham method of stock picking, and maybe his method can't be supplanted by technology, putative market efficiency, or time.  

Love this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Stephen Mauzy, CFA doesn't own any of the stocks mentioned, though he is a Ben Graham fan. He's the author of the upcoming book The Wealth Portfolio. Coca-Cola is a Motley Fool Inside Value and Motley Fool Income Investor selection. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 28, 2009, at 5:00 PM, kurtdabear wrote:

    It's ironic that his article came up the day after I had just finished explaining to one of my sons that he shouldn't believe the "This time it's different/Now it's not the same" crowd. I gave Graham and some of his original statistical signposts as an example of things that people just think "won't work" because "Times change."

    What Graham said worked during and after the last Depression, and it will be found to be true again--with no adjustments necessary for "modern" times.

    Those who buy companies that don't have strong asset values with high margins of safety will be doomed to re-learn that lesson during the next several years.

    For instance, PE is a lagging indicator, and many companies that are really hurting today have great-looking PE's based on last year's earnings, so if you don't leaven them with the data from Rules 2, 9, & 10, you can end up with some real turkeys. And if you don't pay attention to Rule 8, you won't be able to borrow your way out of trouble in case of unexpected problems during times of tight credit and scarce money.

    Incidentally, PDLI is a pharmaceutical royalty company that just "passes through" earnings to shareholders. And most shipping and chemical companies are currently sporting low PE's because depressed conditions in those industries have driven share prices down even as losses are just beginning to be tallied.

    The old rules are good because they have stood the test of time. Time is about to test the new rules.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2009, at 9:06 PM, ikkyu2 wrote:

    OLN is a great stock, but it violates rule 2 - it's at a historically high P/E ratio, looking forward or backwards.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1053968, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2010 11:44:00 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Weekly Walk of Shame: Dick Durbin

Related Tickers

2/10/2010 11:00 AM
ISH $26.20 Down -0.35 -1.32%
International Ship… CAPS Rating: *****
UVV $48.31 Down -1.29 -2.60%
Universal Corp CAPS Rating: ****
OLN $15.43 Down -0.19 -1.22%
Olin Corp CAPS Rating: *****
KO $53.78 Down -0.23 -0.43%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
AEA $4.54 Down -0.07 -1.52%
Advance America, C… CAPS Rating: ****
ELNK $8.05 Down -0.12 -1.47%
EarthLink, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
PDLI $6.58 Down -0.06 -0.90%
PDL BioPharma, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

P/E ratio: The P/E ratio is defined as the price per share of a stock divided by the earnings per share of the stock.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!