This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

7

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
As America was gathering 'round for its national feast Wednesday, Wall Street banker UBS slipped something unpleasant onto the table. No, it wasn't candied yams. (Blame Citigroup for that one.) What UBS brought to table was a pre-Thanksgiving downgrade for NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG)

Why downgrade a utility that's apparently so nice, they named it thrice? Given the amount of attention it garnered, you might think it was NRG's purchase of a solar farm from First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR) that cooked its goose. Or perhaps NRG's decision to pay out a $10-per-share dividend to holders of its preferred stock. But in fact, UBS's beef with NRG was much more banal: They think persistently lower prices on natural gas will pinch NRG's profits. (45% of NRG's U.S. power plants are gas-fired.)

Let's go to the tape
But wait a minute. If gas prices are low, I get why that would mean lower revenues when NRG sells the stuff to its customers -- but don't low nat-gas prices lower the cost of NRG's inputs as well? Net, net, shouldn't the price of gas all balance out?

You might think so. I might think so. But the fact of the matter is ... probably neither of us thinks as well about these kinds of things as UBS. Over the past three years that we've been tracking this company's performance on CAPS, it has consistently outperformed the market across the three major sectors of the energy utility industry -- Gas, Electric, and Multi, and outperformed the market on the majority of its predictions:

 

UBS Says

CAPS Says

UBS's Picks Beating (Lagging) S&P by

Enersis S.A. (NYSE: ENI)

Outperform

*****

45 points

Public Service Enterprise (NYSE: PEG)

Outperform

*****

22 points

FPL Group (NYSE: FPL)

Outperform

*****

15 points

Equitable (NYSE: EQT)

Outperform

***

6 points

Exelon Corp (NYSE: EXC)

Outperform

*****

(8 points)

Moreover, among the three energy utility sectors named, UBS's record is strongest in -- you guessed it -- natural gas specialists like NRG. In short, when UBS tells you NRG is no longer worth buying, there's plenty of reason to take that advice.

And here's a little more
Listen, Fools -- I know that at first glance, NRG looks terribly attractive. The P/E is less than 6, for crying out loud, while most analysts on Wall Street see NRG's profits growing at 9% per year for the foreseeable future. Who wouldn't like that?

Well, me for one. NRG's low P/E notwithstanding, I have to side with UBS on this downgrade. Because of the analyst's record in gas utilities, of course -- but also because when I look a little closer at NRG's valuation, it begins to lose its glow for me.

Why? For one thing, free cash flow at the company comes to just over $800 million, or barely 71% of what the company reports as "net earnings" under GAAP. Plus, NRG carries a boatload of debt -- about $6.5 billion once you net out its cash. Put those two numbers together, and you'll find that while the P/E at NRG is "less than 6," this company's enterprise value-to-free cash flow ratio sits a fair sight higher: The enterprise is valued at roughly 17 times its annual cash earnings. (And did I mention -- even though this is a utility stock, it pays no dividend.)

Foolish takeaway
Dividend-less (for common stockholders, at least) but set to deplete its cash hoard with a preferred dividend, heavily in debt, and less profitable than it looks, I agree with UBS: NRG is no bargain.

(But if it's bargains you seek, we actually do know of some. Grab yourself a free trial to Motley Fool Income Investor now, and let us tell you about our favorite dividend-paying, debt-un-laden, utility recommendations.)

Love this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 731 out of more than 145,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

First Solar is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 29, 2009, at 5:17 PM, jlanganki wrote:

    While it is true that lower natural gas prices make it cheaper to generate electricity from natural gas, there is a side effect of this. Electricity prices on the wholesale market are driven by the "last generator turned on". Natural gas is usually the most expensive way to generate electricity so the last generator to be turned on is usually natural gas. Since natural gas prices are low today, this is driving down the profit margins on every form of electricity (including coal). NRG has quite a bit of coal powered generation which is the portion of their business being hurt most by low natural gas prices. Their natural gas generation is also the older "single-cycle" rather than "dual-cycle" generation, so much of it needs to be upgraded.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2009, at 7:42 PM, bayboy55 wrote:

    Iv'e owned peg since the80's great stock and div. all these yr's it;s part of my retirement portfolio

    go!!! PSEG

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1053952, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2010 10:56:19 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Weekly Walk of Shame: Dick Durbin

Related Tickers

2/10/2010 10:28 AM
EQT $41.92 Down -0.88 -2.06%
EQT Corp. CAPS Rating: ***
PEG $29.45 Down -0.44 -1.47%
Public Service Ent… CAPS Rating: ****
ENI $21.20 Down -0.28 -1.30%
Enersis S.A. (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
FSLR $107.45 Down -5.84 -5.16%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
NRG $21.41 Down -0.48 -2.19%
NRG Energy, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
FPL $46.02 Down -0.44 -0.95%
FPL Group, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
EXC $43.78 Down -0.44 -1.00%
Exelon Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Weighted average cost of capital: The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for a firm is the weighted average of the cost of debt and cost of equity.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!