Recs

7

Google's New Tech Offer

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

I guess we shouldn't be surprised to see Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) providing the nuts and bolts of Internet traffic management for free. Still, the free Google Domain Name Service (DNS) comes from way out in left field, so let's figure out what Big G is getting out of this new commitment.

DNS servers are part of the glue that holds the Internet together. When you type "www.google.com" into your Web browser, a DNS server translates that readable address into a series of numbers and dots that make more sense to machines, and then the connection can continue. Unless you manage computer networks for a living, like I did for six years, all of this is transparent action behind the scenes that you probably never have to worry about.

And your Internet service provider handles the translation requests with its own DNS servers. A Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA  ) cable modem gets the information from Comcast's machines; Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) FiOS or DSL connections knock on Verizon's door, and so on. There is a small cottage industry that provides freely available alternatives to the service providers' DNS services, but again, most people just don't care.

So why would you use a Google DNS server? Google claims that its implementation of the technology gives you increased security and faster performance than what your default service already gives you, partly thanks to Google's global network of fully functional data centers that stand ready to serve your DNS and search needs.

There's no reason why other globally connected IT shops couldn't start a similar service. But Google is doing it while the likes of Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) , Akamai Technologies (Nasdaq: AKAM  ) , and Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO  ) remain on the sidelines. It's easy to see why the others aren't too eager to jump in: Nobody gets paid for DNS requests, and the current crop of alternative services make money by selling ads on their error pages. Google doesn't even do that, and promises to keep data mining to a minimum. Again, why spend the money and resources to hand out a free service that most people never cared about?

The answer is obvious: Google wants the Web to work better, feel faster, and overall become a more pleasant experience. Happy users who don't have to wait for slowly loading pages will end up browsing more, and then the ad clicks go up too. Google makes money when the average surfer is happy. This service is just a small piece of that effort to improve your browsing experience, alongside the Android mobile platform and many other not-too-obvious money makers.

Should we all put on our tinfoil hats and move into survivalist bunkers, or is Google really just trying to help? Let the flame wars begin in the comments below.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares in Google and Akamai, but he holds no other position in any of the companies discussed here. He has never worn a tinfoil hat, much preferring a stylish bell-laden Fool cap. Akamai Technologies and Google are Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendations. Amazon.com is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. You can check out Anders' holdings and a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 04, 2009, at 3:53 PM, joegurguis wrote:

    Akamai is so deep into DNS they are probably serving 10 or 20% of all DNS lookups on the entire internet. DNS has been the backbone of all their CDN offerings for 10 years. I'm not sure what you mean that they are sitting on the sideline.

  • Report this Comment On December 04, 2009, at 3:54 PM, joegurguis wrote:

    Akamai is so deep into DNS they are probably serving 10 or 20% of all DNS lookups on the entire internet. DNS has been the backbone of all their CDN offerings for 10 years. I'm not sure what you mean that they are sitting on the sideline.

  • Report this Comment On December 04, 2009, at 7:59 PM, pi2000 wrote:

    DNS won't help slowly loading pages load faster. DNS has nothing to do with page load speed. Quicker DNS resolution can help lower connection times, not load times. All ISPs provide DNS ips that are local to your node often < 5-ms away. Why would you send your requests farther away to Google? Akamai uses end user nameserver location to choose a local Akamai node for delivering your content. If you plug in Google's 8.8.8.8 address, this will pretty much break Akamai's secret sauce and send you to a far away node, increasing your load time dramatically. This is just another way for Google to data mine EVERY website you visit, cookies or not.

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2009, at 7:09 AM, TMFZahrim wrote:

    @joegurguis, Akamai sells its "Enhanced DNS" to, you know, service providers. I don't know of a free Akamai DNS server for consumers, which is what Google is providing.

    @pi2000, the 8.8.8.8 (etc) is a redirected address just like anything Akamai would use, pointing you to the closest Google DNS resource. I don't know if they're using Radware routers (like Akamai used to) or some in-house solution, but there it is. Also, DNS requests can in fact make a big difference to load times, particularly on pages with content from many sources. Some Facebook apps and many MySpace pages will benefit greatly, just for starters. Sure, you could ask for good page design to mitigate the same issue, but there's already plenty of Web content out there that will never, ever be redesigned for speed. And to Google, every millisecond counts: http://www.google.com/corporate/ux.html

    And for all the privacy diehards out there:

    http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq.html#privacy

    With Google Public DNS, we collect IP address (only temporarily) and ISP and location information (in permanent logs) for the purpose of making our service faster, better and more secure. Specifically, we use this data to conduct debugging, to analyze abuse phenomena and to improve our prefetching feature. After 24 hours, we erase any IP information. For more information, read the Google Public DNS privacy page.

    Is any of the information collected stored with my Google account?

    No.

    Does Google share the information it collects from the Google Public DNS service with anyone else?

    No.

    Is information about my queries to Google Public DNS shared with other Google properties, such as Search, Gmail, ads networks, etc.?

    No.

    As I understand it, Google could be in big legal trouble if it lied about these things. Again, I haven't got a tinfoil hat. Yet.

    Anders

  • Report this Comment On December 05, 2009, at 7:11 AM, TMFZahrim wrote:

    Privacy policy: http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq.html#privacy

    Every millisecond counts: http://www.google.com/corporate/ux.html

    Google DNS uses similar redirection techniques to Akamai or Radware products. Also, Akamai's DNS is not a freely available consumer choice.

    Anders

  • Report this Comment On December 07, 2009, at 4:12 PM, ynotc wrote:

    I guess everyone who has a legitimate concern should be labeled as "tinhat' Maybe we would all be calling Nouri al Rabini a tinhat type if his prediction did not come true. There is always a trade off between using data for legitimate business purposes and a persons privacy.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1059465, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 9:37:39 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 21 minutes ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
VZ $41.45 Up +0.06 +0.14%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
YHOO $15.36 Up +0.01 +0.07%
Yahoo! CAPS Rating: **
CMCSA $28.85 Down -0.08 -0.28%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: **
AKAM $29.31 Down -0.09 -0.31%
Akamai Technologie… CAPS Rating: ****
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement