Recs

71

The Future of Gold, the Dollar, and More

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

The dollar has had a huge effect on the stock market's moves this year. As the dollar has depreciated, many stocks have climbed higher; the logic is that a weaker dollar will boost the bottom lines of companies such as McDonald's (NYSE: MCD  ) , Aflac (NYSE: AFL  ) , and Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO  ) , all of which derive a substantial portion of their revenues from abroad. The depreciating dollar has also boosted commodity prices and associated commodity stocks such as Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX  ) or Newmont Mining (NYSE: NEM  ) , serving to lift the market.

As we approach 2010, what is the future of the dollar, and what are the implications for the asset prices that move inversely to it? What does it all mean when it comes to rebalancing the global economy and our economic relationship with China?

For some insight on all this, I spoke with the man who had the foresight to call the financial meltdown in 2006: Peter Schiff, president and chief global strategist of Euro Pacific Capital and author of the newly updated book Crash Proof 2.0.

Schiff believes the dollar is on a long-term downward trajectory, and that it could collapse if the government continues its current policies. That has implications for the stock market and gold, which he thinks could go to $5,000 an ounce.

Here's an edited transcript of our conversation:

Jennifer Schonberger: You've been bearish on the dollar for some time. Do you still stand by your bearish call for the greenback?

Peter Schiff: Yes. I think the dollar is going to fall for years. It's not going to fall every day, or every week. There are going to be periods of time where the dollar rallies -- that's how markets work. Like a bull market climbs a wall of worry, a bear market follows a slope of hope. And there's always going to be hope that the dollar is going to recover, based on "maybe the Fed will raise interest rates," "maybe the U.S. economy will improve." But none of that is going to help the dollar. I think the dollar's fate has been sealed by the policies being pursued by the government and the Federal Reserve, and unfortunately it's a grim fate.

Schonberger: If the dollar does remain weak, as you expect, what are the implications in terms of rebalancing the global economy?

Schiff: Part of rebalancing the global economy is going to necessitate a lower dollar. The reason the global economy is so out of balance is because the dollar is artificially strong. It's been propped up by foreign central banks, and this enables Americans to import products they really can't afford. So if we want the global imbalances to be solved, it's going to require a lower dollar -- and that's what's going to happen. The longer foreign central banks artificially prop up the dollar, enabling Americans to keep spending borrowed money, the worse the global imbalances are going to get.

Schonberger: You recently wrote, "While [China's] peg [to the U.S. dollar] certainly is responsible for much of the world's problems, its abandonment would cause severe hardship in the United States." Why?

Schiff: It would cause hardship in the U.S., but it's something that we have to deal with sooner rather than later. By propping up the U.S. dollar and by carrying U.S.-dollar-denominated debt -- U.S. Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities -- the Chinese have kept interest rates and consumer prices artificially low. Americans have been able to benefit from that in the short run because their mortgages, car payments, and credit card payments are lower. They can go to stores like Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT  ) and get those everyday low prices. But those prices aren't because of Wal-Mart, they're because of China.

When the Chinese government removes all those subsidies, there's going to be an immediate benefit to the Chinese people, because they're suddenly going to see lower prices and more access to capital. In America, we're going to have the rug pulled out from under us ...

Schonberger: The dollar is central to the relationships of other assets' prices. There is an inverse relationship between the dollar and equities. Do you expect that linkage (between the dollar and equities) to continue into next year?

Schiff: Remember, there's an inverse relationship between the dollar and the price of everything, because as the dollar loses value, you need more dollars to buy anything. That's true for an ounce of gold, a barrel of oil, a bushel of wheat, or shares of stock. So you're always going to see prices rising as the dollar is falling. That's what's happening now.

Now at some point, inflation could be so problematic that it drives interest rates up substantially, and as inflation gets bigger and bigger, the prices that tend to react more quickly will be things like food and energy. So if U.S. corporations suddenly see the cost of their long-term debt or short-term debt jump up and their customers don't have any money to buy their products because they're spending all their money on food, then ultimately you could see falling stock prices as the dollar is falling.

Schonberger: Speaking of relationships, you expect gold to go to $5,000 an ounce, correct?

Schiff: Yeah. It could go higher than that, but I think $5,000 is a reasonable expectation of where gold is headed over the course of the next several years, based on monetary and fiscal policy that is in place. Now if the government were to reverse course -- if they suddenly brought the budget into surplus, and if the Fed aggressively raised interest rates back up to a reasonable level, say 5%, 6%, or 7%, not just a quarter-point every few months -- then gold would probably not get to $5,000.

But I don't think they're going to do that. Based on what the Fed is saying and doing, they're going to keep interest rates at practically nothing for as far as the eye can see. The U.S. economy is not recovering. All we're doing is spending stimulus money. The minute you take away the stimulus, all the GDP growth, all the jobs that are associated with that stimulus spending, will vanish. So they can't take the stimulus away without destroying the phony recovery. So if interest rates are going to stay low and they're going to keep printing money, the only thing that's going to happen is the dollar is going to fall until it all of a sudden collapses ...

Schonberger: So then you're actually calling for a collapse in the dollar relatively soon?

Schiff: Relatively soon, yes. Maybe not tomorrow, but I think it will happen soon. I think it will happen before Barack Obama leaves office even if he's only a one-termer. The first initial collapse in the dollar will be about a 50%, 60%, or 70% decline in dollar value. That collapse will usher in the new leg -- the much more severe leg of our economic downturn. Not only will we have a financial crisis, but we'll also have a currency and economic crisis.

Hopefully that will be the tough medicine, the shock that finally causes Congress and the Fed to abandon its current policy and start doing the right thing. If it doesn't -- if they respond to that big drop in the dollar by creating more inflation, and if they fail to raise interest rates aggressively and withdraw liquidity -- then they will turn the dollar into confetti. Then we will have hyperinflation. If we go down that road, gold prices aren't just going to $5,000, they'll go to $50,000, or $500,000. I hope that cooler heads will prevail before we go down that road, but from this point that's still a possibility if we don't change policies.

Strong words from Peter Schiff. Share your own in the comments section below.

6 stocks you can't afford to ignore! Motley Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner just handpicked 6 rock-solid, well-run companies they believe you need to be watching. Get the names and stock symbols right now in a FREE report from The Motley Fool. We'll add the first ticker to your personal My Watchlist, a FREE service that gives you the latest news on the companies that matter most to you. For instant access to your free report, simply enter your email address here:

Fool contributor Jennifer Schonberger does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. AFLAC is a Stock Advisor recommendation. Coke and Wal-Mart are Inside Value picks. Coke is also an Income Investor recommendation. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 11, 2009, at 2:05 PM, spfix wrote:

    He's right - it's simple math.

  • Report this Comment On December 11, 2009, at 5:39 PM, MikeLCT wrote:

    Him and Ross Perot...swami fortune tellers!

  • Report this Comment On December 11, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Fool wrote:

    who thinks thinks that these gold prices could not happen should check out on the internet "Hungarian super inflation" The monetary system went within one year from paper money denomination of 1, 5, 10 and 20 to billion trillion trillion. The highest single paper money was 1x10to 27 power. Prices were doubling on the average 3 times a day. There are pictures on the net showing worthless bills being swept up on the street by street sweepers.

  • Report this Comment On December 11, 2009, at 10:11 PM, ajrolfs1 wrote:

    I agree rich, Gold is a hedge against a weaker dollar but if you can get a better than inflation, return on equities you're ahead of Gold

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 5:01 AM, MrEd1971 wrote:

    Interesting article and I agree with the general principles. However, the focus is on the lack of options the US has. There are always 2 sides: yes, the US has problems, but the rest of the world has a bigger one: they are holding US debt. As the largest holder of US debt, China will need to rescue the global financial system and in its own interest revalue the Yuan. The choice for China may well come down to ignoring the problem while watching imbalances become even more unsustainable, or writing off US debt as the Yuan is revalued upwards. This could be done at a pace which is beneficial to China, and in a structured, controlled manner. Think of it in accounting terms: China has a large bad debt on its books which needs removing?

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 9:58 AM, TMFTypeoh wrote:

    I agree with schiff's comments, but i don't think we'll get anywhere close to gold $5,000. There will always be forces driving commidities higher, and its good to be long a certain percentage of your portfolio, but their will always be forces that push the value the other way.

    As gold goes higher, the miners will simply pump out more supply. In addition, you will see signs EVERYWHERE saying "return your old jewerly for cash!". Again, increasing the supply.

    I still feel that the best way to play the inflation hedge is to own foriegn, dividend paying companies who will benefit directly from the long term decline of the dollar. Focus on companies that have good management, and are committed to dividends and you won't care if gold goes to $500 or $5,000.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 10:23 AM, dymty wrote:

    As typeoh wrote, when gold gets so high, the mines will simply crank up production (why wouldn't they?). In the mean time, there may exist a gold bubble until the supply/demand equation balances out.

    Frankly I don't see a return of the Wiemar Republic here, but be in for the ride of your life. Talk about swells! The undulations of the markets will be off the charts until all the monetary policies are sorted. If you've the stomach for this, here's your ultimate E ticket: this ride will last at least five years, and many will end up puking their guts out.

    In the end, it's not what gold will be worth in dollars, but what it will be worth in foreign exchanges. When the dust settles we may just see a global currency, and the key will be its relationship to gold.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Gorm wrote:

    It is difficult to envision a world with the USD in collapse. It is THE reserve currency. Ramifications would be horrific. While Gold may be a store of value how are workers compensated to keep our specialized functions operating? If we revert to basic needs, who is controlling the rush, the conflict, those who already are arming themselves to take what they need?

    I fear too many take a simplistic perception of a collapse suggesting that Gold merely becomes the medium of exchange. Think again.

    Imagine a world when you function at Maslow's lowest level in his hierarchy, ie food, clothing, shelter, medical care. How many are equipped to provide those essential needs to their family? If Gold were able to buy someone's surplus needs, how long do you think you could hold on to it once the word is out?

    Often said if our economy collapses the most victimized people in America will be the Amish!! (Am told they are arming up- which strikes me strange as they are so passive!)

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Bkeepr100 wrote:

    The miners can't just ramp up gold production, despite what the price of gold does. The peak production of metal gold appears to have occurred in 2000 or 2001. South Africa's mines are about 90-95% exhausted. Most of the known larger, richer deposits are mined out. A lot of the gold now recovered is micron sized , with mined areas yielding 1/2 gram or more gold per ton of ore processed. Compare with the old mine records of 16 grams or less gold per ton of rock in the past. In the old west the miners would just discard ore into the waste pile that was of lower gold content. In most mines the precious metals are a byproduct of the process of recoving some other mineral.

    A number of years ago a geologist while giving a lecture said that Silver would be the first element to "go extinct" from the periodic table of chemistry. This may occur before 2025-2050. There will be traces in some mines, but no pure silver mines will be left open in the world.

    All of the PM's will be more expensive and more rare. $5,000 gold is a very real possiblity.

    Hyperinflation is the big problem coming down the track. We are headed on this fast track towards economic ruin with the smokin', red hot printing press pressed to Uncle Sam's head in a threating manner.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Bkeepr100 wrote:

    The miners can't just ramp up gold production, despite what the price of gold does. The peak production of metal gold appears to have occurred in 2000 or 2001. South Africa's mines are about 90-95% exhausted. Most of the known larger, richer deposits are mined out. A lot of the gold now recovered is micron sized , with mined areas yielding 1/2 gram or more gold per ton of ore processed. Compare with the old mine records of 16 grams or less gold per ton of rock in the past. In the old west the miners would just discard ore into the waste pile that was of lower gold content. In most mines the precious metals are a byproduct of the process of recoving some other mineral.

    A number of years ago a geologist while giving a lecture said that Silver would be the first element to "go extinct" from the periodic table of chemistry. This may occur before 2025-2050. There will be traces in some mines, but no pure silver mines will be left open in the world.

    All of the PM's will be more expensive and more rare. $5,000 gold is a very real possiblity.

    Hyperinflation is the big problem coming down the track. We are headed on this fast track towards economic ruin with the smokin', red hot printing press pressed to Uncle Sam's head in a threating manner.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 11:43 AM, OldAtHeart wrote:

    America... too big to fail?

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 8:58 PM, albeit wrote:

    Most of the gold ever mind is still in the supply. A single year's production isn't going to affect supply very much. That's what makes gold such a great thing to base a currency on.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 9:47 PM, AvianFlu wrote:

    A few minutes ago I was in a used book store reading a doom and gloom book from 1975. The arguments in the book sounded almost exactly like what is being said today by Schiff and others. Except to say that the numbers now are WAY more dire. For example, the book was referring to the almost inconceivable federal debt of almost half a trillion dollars! If only we had that problem now.

    But now we know that Reagan and Volker came along and straightened out the mess and averted a giant catastrophe, although it was painful. Unfortunately, this time around the situation is so much more extreme that I don't see much chance of the situation being resolved. Plus, where is the Reagan or Volker of today?

    So I am going to say that Schiff is correct and we'll say how long it takes to play out. It could be years, but one never knows. As for gold, the percentage price increase to get to $5,000 is about the same as it took to get from 10 cent cups of coffee to 50 cent cups. As I recall that happened quickly in the inflation era of the 1970's. Then coffee increased an additional 1000% after that to about $5 per cup. I remember complaining loudly that I would NEVER pay 50 cents for a cup of coffee!!!

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 9:58 PM, AvianFlu wrote:

    A few minutes ago I was in a used book store reading a doom and gloom book from 1975. The arguments in the book sounded almost exactly like what is being said today by Schiff and others. Except to say that the numbers now are WAY more dire. For example, the book was referring to the almost inconceivable federal debt of almost half a trillion dollars! If only we had that problem now.

    But now we know that Reagan and Volker came along and straightened out the mess and averted a giant catastrophe, although it was painful. Unfortunately, this time around the situation is so much more extreme that I don't see much chance of the situation being resolved. Plus, where is the Reagan or Volker of today?

    So I am going to say that Schiff is correct and we'll say how long it takes to play out. It could be years, but one never knows. As for gold, the percentage price increase to get to $5,000 is about the same as it took to get from 10 cent cups of coffee to 50 cent cups. As I recall that happened quickly in the inflation era of the 1970's. Then coffee increased an additional 1000% after that to about $5 per cup. I remember complaining loudly that I would NEVER pay 50 cents for a cup of coffee!!!

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2009, at 11:43 PM, brojiml wrote:

    Now 75+, I recall diner coffee @ $0.05/cup; payphone local call the same; regular gasoline @ $0.14/gallon, machine dispensed cigarettes @ 0.20 and the buyer got two $0.02 in pure copper cents in the cellophane. That was in the era of silver dimes, quarters, half dollars (which were very common in pocket change) and less common silver Dollars. American's gold was unconstitutionslly confiscated one year before I was born. so I never saw any gold in circulation, but I hope to see it in the near future. When I was in grammar school gold was $35.00/T.oz. Friday's close was $1,115.10. And that's after a dollar 'rally.'

    If there is no limit to the sum of dollars created out of thin air, there is no limit to the dollar price of gold, or anything else of real value. Best have some pre-1965 U.S. dimes & quarters in your piggy bank. If you are richer, a few Krugerrands to boot.

    Paper assets may blow away in the winds of change. Many nations have tried fiat money inflation and none, not any, have been successful as the greedy politicians promise their greedy constituents more 'free' goodies from the government's treasury and the presses run...until the inevitable boom & crash.

    See RunToGold.com, review "The Great Credit Contraction'" for yourselves.

  • Report this Comment On December 13, 2009, at 7:09 PM, iocca wrote:

    Peter's source of economic education and wisdom can be found at Mises.org. It explains economics easily and demystifies the fairy tales the government creates as it creates even more damage to our economy and future.

    Love Liberty,

    Rebecca Iocca

    www.iocca.us

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 11:03 AM, plange01 wrote:

    the future of gold? 450 a oz.when you subtract all of the ancient reasons people bought gold your left with shiny worthless junk!

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 11:11 AM, VegasMartin wrote:

    Gold cannot go up every single day. I think this was a healthy pullback in the gold markets. $1100 seems reasonable and at $1250 is starts getting ridiculous. I think it becomes range-bound for a while, but I definitely do not see it ever getting below $1,000 again. It's the ultimate protection for fiat money. The dollar is a complete fraud!

    http://www.ShootTheBears.com

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 1:47 PM, TMFSinchiruna wrote:

    Great interview, Jennifer!

    The longer I stand by my $2,000 long-term price target for gold, which has remained unchanged for more than three years, the more conservative that projection begins to appear.

    Let us all hope that some measure of fiscal sanity prevails before some hyperinflationary scenarios that Peter alludes to above move closer to reality. Voters are reminded to let their fiscal concerns be known to their respective representatives.

    If gold prices do record the parabolic rises of the magnitude that Peter suggests, nobody wins. Although I am resolutely long gold and silver, I continue to hope that my projections will be rendered incorrect by a swift and effective change of course.

    I fear, however, that in terms of a response strategy we have sailed straight past the point of no return ... we are rather committed now to the interventionist reflationary approach. I agree with Peter that as loathsome as an unmitigated deleveraging event would have been when the crisis first manifested, compared with the specter of one that ensues in the wake of the countermeasures employed, the initial deleveraging event would have been the lesser of two evils.

    http://www.fool.com/investing/international/2009/03/24/102-t...

    "With a collective response that crams trillions of eggs into one hastily woven basket, the largest bets in history are being placed upon the roulette wheel of global financial markets. The adopted strategy of spending our way out of this mess by propping up the system with loans and guarantees has now been etched into stone ... there is no turning back. To the contrary, I fear the only path ahead implies still further commitments of public funds and woeful undermining of the U.S. dollar."

    http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=281423&t=0...

    http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=298728&t=0...

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 8:39 PM, TrexNapp wrote:

    What about Deflation? Like Mish Shedlock says: So what if you print alot of money if you end up buring it in your back yard. Meaning banks are not lending, people are not spending, so the money is not in circulation. Also, what about credit debt destruction. As more and more people default on their homes, credit cards, or any other debt, money supply is destroyed, so it compensates for all the printing the Fed is doing.

    I think deflation is a bigger problem in the next few years than Inflation. In fact, the dollar may rally very soon as Bob Prechter predicts because of deflationary forces and carry trade bubbles in equities and other risky assets. So watch out for a leg drop in 2010 in equities and a rally on the dollar.

    A good strategy would be to stay in cash (dollars) and take advantage of the upcoming collapse in equities and commodities.

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 9:36 PM, myeerah wrote:

    I invested with Europac all forty two thousand of my roth IRA after reading Peters book.My broker invested al my money in penny stocks!! One company in New Zealand PGG Wrightson went bankrupt and the others are all under a dollar except for one coal company in Australia.Finally after two years and my broker leaving the brokerage without anyone telling me for months I gave up.I lost a bunch of money and have done better in the market investing myself.I had spoken to Howard shelly about investing conservativley and all I got was thousands of shares in Hill end gold corp that goes for 25 cents a share!! Think twice before investing with these guys!!

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 11:29 PM, jjflood wrote:

    I have the opposite experience. I sold my house after listening to Peter's radio show. I put 100k in Europac and am up almost 100% One stock is up 1200%. It is by far outperforming any other accounts I have, or have heard about.

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2009, at 11:31 PM, jjflood wrote:

    Also, my IRA at Europac has gone from 41k to 90k since I moved it there in Feb.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2009, at 2:20 AM, fulkarboy wrote:

    Don't expect mines to "crank out" more gold in a hurry. IF gold got much higher they'd mine lower grades of ore and over time, mine more BUT it'd be years due to the lag time of getting more equipment, trained personnel etc.

    With the bottom 50% of wage earners in America paying next to nothing in income taxes and conditioned to vote for anti-business socialists that promise free lunches, the debts will keep piling up and businesses and capital will migrate overseas.

    We can barely pay the Gov. debts NOW and AREN"T. As more and more boomers retire and seek the benefits they were promised, debts will skyrocket. That's been the Lefts plan for decades ever since Cloward & Piven were successful in driving NYC into bankruptcy in the 70's. Overload the system till it collapses, then blame capitalism, LOL!

    Just like blocking every decent domestic form of energy, some for decades, THEN complaining about high energy prices. OR "community activists" like our Marxist in Chief, suing banks to force them to loan to folks with bad credit, IN A HOUSING BUBBLE! Then when the usual bust follows the boom, who to blame? Banks and Wall Street? LOL

    So far the present regime is aping FDR's playbook. Demonizing bankers, corporations while expanding Gov and adding more cumbersome diktats for businesses. I doubt the results this time will be much different than in the 30's except in places wed to the "handout mentality" where things will get rough quickly.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2009, at 9:15 AM, naveenkumarnair wrote:

    I read all this blogs and it all reminds me of the doomsday predictions. They all look pretty heavy on the negative side. I agree with global imbalance created by dollar, gold as being a hedge, oppurtunity in international markets and so on... key is not dragging it to far. Peter Schiff's of the world may be right about few things but I definitely doubt the sincerity behind his call for 5000$ in gold price. As investors we must understand that markets is a huge force. Currently, there is an imbalance in the relative price that US pays for a commodity compared to rest of the world, be it oil prices at the pump, clothes in department stores, food at a restaurant etc etc... Obviously there is a gap and drop in US Dollar will bridge that gap... As this happens outsourced manufacturing will become more and more expensive and will bring back manufacturing back into this country...Which will kind of signal the reverse of what we are witnessing now... This will mean rise of US market, collapse or stagnation in international market and so on..much similar to the way Asian markets revived after their collapse in 90's. For gold.. let me assert historically a boom in the stock market goes for 7-8 years... a boom for commodity market is about 12-15 years... going by these figures... I feel that the commodity boom that we are seeing in the markets will continue another 2-3 years max...As an investor I will suggest start exiting gold at 1800/ounce and keep bringing down the gold portfolio to zero by 2000$... remember at this point the risk of holding gold would rise tremendously... on a long term basis... I see a crash in gold prices(2000 down to 1000) and rise of the greenback... US and european stock market has been on a long term side way movement, since the 90's... if you have a 10 year horizon... trust that next boom in stock market is going to come from one of these two continents...Night is darkest before the dawn.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2009, at 2:26 PM, LBMar wrote:

    I'm 62 y.o. and have seen this before. You always start seeing them advertising gold, silver, and platinum at the top of the cycle for the price of precious metals.

    If you already own gold now may be the best time to sell it rather than buy it.

    Otherwise buy gold mining stocks not the metal.

    If you want to own the metal remember that you have to store it so that is an extra expense of owning it and that buying and selling it incurs fees which are also expenses.

    Buy it when it is selling for half the current price not now.

    You might also want to look for a chart that compair returns from stocks and gold over the long term.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2009, at 3:44 PM, globalsailor wrote:

    I'll make this call: Brazil and Israel are probably the two best places to invest. Brazil has a inflation hawk central bank that keeps rates high and while Israel was the first developed country to raise interest rates it also has some awesome technological innovation.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2009, at 9:34 PM, murthg1 wrote:

    Increase interest rates in the middle of high unemployment. The IMF gave the same advice to other countries in crisis...with disastrous results. We need to invest in future jobs in high tech and green jobs.

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2009, at 12:58 AM, goalie37 wrote:

    The story that the dollar will collapse and gold will become king is told to us mainly by people trying to sell us gold. In this case, books about gold.

    Look at a chart for gold over the last year and a chart for the dollar. Gold is up way more than the dollar is down. It is this mantra-style thinking that will probably push us into a gold bubble. But like all bubbles, it will burst.

    Yes, the American economy is in a severe predicament, and current policies aren't making people feel any better about things. But I pause at the leap in logic that pushes the euro higher. Doesn't Europe have an economic crisis too? Aren't Greece and Spain part of Europe? Didn't the ECB push forth a stimulus plan too? One that could devalue the currency if not mopped up properly? Why should the yen move below 90? Do people really think Japan is a good place to park their money?

    As Fools, it is our job to look rationally when others become prisoners of emotion. When promises of wealth spark greed, and when dire warnings cause panic. Gold may go up in the short term. It may go up quite a bit. But I will not play their game. I will instead continue follow the rules and discipline that have consistently put Fools ahead of the rest.

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2009, at 12:53 PM, JGBFool wrote:

    naveenkumarnair has a good point.

    At some point the falling dollar is bound to set in motion a negative feedback loop-- eventually overseas outsourcing becomes more expensive than it is worth and U.S. manufactured exports will become more affordable overseas. That is bound to help spur job growth in the U.S., and will help sustain our economy.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2009, at 3:13 PM, nopolitition wrote:

    Read cloward-piven at www.cloward-piven.com and let me know what you think they are selling

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2009, at 8:18 PM, Fool wrote:

    This is really scary.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2009, at 10:41 PM, jc2811 wrote:

    VHGI 3rd Quarter 10Q shows positive income; Gold Strategy http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Virtual-Health-Technologies-pr...

  • Report this Comment On April 28, 2011, at 1:24 PM, buyinggold123 wrote:

    LBMar has a good point. Buy deciding to own physical stock of gold and silver you have to take into account a number of pros and cons including storage fees, insurance etc. it doesn't always cut it to bury you gold in the backyard..not if you have a nosy neighbor. See this quick summery which discusses pros and cons of different forms of precious metal ownership http://www.buyinggold123.com/buying-gold-silver/

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1065208, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/9/2012 4:00:07 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,901.51 17.56 0.14%
S&P 500 1,352.84 2.88 0.21%
NASD 2,928.69 12.83 0.44%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 3:24 PM
MCD $99.86 Down -0.19 -0.19%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
NEM $60.54 Down -0.16 -0.26%
Newmont Mining Cor… CAPS Rating: ***
WMT $62.05 Up +0.43 +0.70%
Wal-Mart Stores CAPS Rating: ****
AFL $48.97 Down -0.40 -0.81%
Aflac CAPS Rating: *****
FCX $46.48 Down -0.05 -0.11%
Freeport-McMoRan C… CAPS Rating: ****
KO $67.99 Down -0.34 -0.50%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement