Recs

7

Instant Magic From Starbucks

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX  ) delivered a great surprise for investors. Its fiscal first-quarter results contained many promising signs for the coffee giant, including the success of an initiative that brewed up some skepticism at its launch.

There was a lot to like in Starbucks' report:

  • Net income increased 276%, to $241.5 million, or $0.32 per share.
  • Total sales increased 4%, to $2.72 billion.
  • Comps increased 4%, compared to last year's 9% decline -- an admittedly easy comparison.

While that increase in comps was heartening, it owed mostly to customers paying more, rather than more customers actually setting foot inside the coffee shops. The company reported a 4% increase in its average ticket, compared to just a 1% increase in customer traffic.

Intriguingly, the company's instant coffee offering, VIA, has been a hit with Starbucks fans. Research suggests that VIA is producing a significant number of repeat customers. VIA's not only available at Starbucks stores, but also at Costco (Nasdaq: COST  ) , Target (NYSE: TGT  ) , REI, Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) , and other retailers.

In the conference call, founder and CEO Howard Schultz addressed the need for continued innovation during our current economic difficulties. But he also shared reasons for optimism, including Starbucks' continued plans for growth in huge international markets like China. Starbucks has enjoyed very strong comps and store profitability as it ventures into the world's most populous country.

Schultz was also excited about VIA, adding that many customers consume it at home or work as a single-serve option that "does not require costly proprietary brewing equipment." Is that a little bust on Green Mountain Coffee Roasters' (Nasdaq: GMCR  ) Keurig one-cup brewers? Oh, snap!

Some of Starbucks' innovations have sounded a little crazy at first, but they've surprised me with their success. I thought its oatmeal initiative was wacky, yet it ended up resonating well with consumers. My similarly negative reaction to VIA seems no less off the mark, although our poll a year ago showed that only 19% of Foolish reader respondents thought it would be a hit.

As a Starbucks shareholder, I'm glad to see things moving in the right direction. Even though I nominated it as the Best Stock for 2009 in late 2008, as last year wore on, I voiced doubts many times. This quarter was heartening after all that angst.

That said, Starbucks' shares have soared 162% in a year. Even though Starbucks upped its earnings expectations for fiscal 2010, is the stock getting too expensive right now? Can it return to the old, old Starbucks, which constantly reported amazing financial results that pleasantly shocked everybody over and over? My Foolish colleague Tim Beyers seems to think not.

In December 2008, it was easy to suggest Starbucks was a steal, trading at 10 times forward earnings. Now it's trading at 20 times forward earnings; you can still get McDonald's (NYSE: MCD  ) shares far cheaper than that. Let us know in the comment boxes below whether you think Starbucks is a good buy now -- or head over to Tim's article, and respond to the poll there.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Starbucks, Amazon.com, and Costco are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections. Costco is an Inside Value selection. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters is a Rule Breakers recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Costco. Try any of our Foolish newsletters free for 30 days.

Alyce Lomax owns shares of Starbucks. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    "The Worst Stocks for 2010: Starbucks

    By Tim Beyers

    January 21, 2010"

    "Instant Magic From Starbucks

    By Alyce Lomax

    January 21, 2010"

    "STARBUCKS, Amazon.com, and Costco are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections"

    "Worst Stock for 2009: Starbucks

    By Rick Aristotle Munarriz

    January 28, 2009"

    "Even though I nominated it as the Best Stock for 2009 in late 2008"

    Perhaps this explains it: "Yet we had the nerve (or at least the EDITORIAL DEADLINE) to call out 10 companies as the worst places to invest for the coming year."

    You can't make this Sh!t up. We aren't reading well reasoned articles on investing ideas, we are reading ads to sell newsletters imposed by a DeadLine.

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2010, at 3:48 PM, pondee619 wrote:

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2010, at 4:27 PM, BadCopNoDonuts wrote:

    Via actually is very good. At this point it's the best instant coffee I've tasted. If you buy the 45 pack (web site), it's only 70 cents a cup, and if you make two cups from each packet, it's 35 cents! There might be a dip in stock price coming up, but I think Starbucks is headed for the stars in the long run. They've got brand recognition that the competitors can't even touch!

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2010, at 5:04 PM, rgardner101 wrote:

    20 times forward earnings, much higher than McDonalds. Just wait and see what happens when the

    market in China heats up.

  • Report this Comment On January 22, 2010, at 12:23 PM, TMFLomax wrote:

    pondee619,

    I'm not sure what your point is. I nominated Starbucks as the Best Stock for 2009 (and it did end up performing well in 2009). My Foolish colleague Rick Munarriz had a different opinion at that time and nominated it as the Worst Stock for 2009.

    My Foolish colleague Tim Beyers nominated Starbucks as the Worst Stock for 2010. I respect his and my other Foolish colleagues' opinions (and I think whether it's overpriced at the moment is certainly an important thought for investors to contemplate).

    All Fools are encouraged to voice their opinions on stocks, regardless of whether they are newsletter recommendations or not. Part of being an investor is rejecting or accepting an investment thesis. Personally, I believe the fact that the Fool encourages expression of both bull and bear cases on stocks and opens it up for community discussion is a very, very GOOD thing. This is intellectual discussion and critical thinking. I'm not too sure why this seems so offensive to you. (I couldn't help but notice this seems to be a common complaint from you.)

    BadCopNoDonuts: I am very curious to try the Via after the word that it has been such a success. Thanks for letting us know that you are one of the fans and your thoughts on the brand.

  • Report this Comment On January 22, 2010, at 1:07 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    What are the Fool's definitions of "Worst Stock" and "Best Stock"?

    mine are: " Worst Stock" will be the poorest performer in its universe.

    "Best Stock" will out perform all other stocks in its universe.

    I submit, that reasonable people cannot look at the same stock, at the same time, and have one say it is the BEST and the other say it is the WORST. I futher submit, that if a stock is a newsletter pick (thereby being one the the Best), it can not be the WORST stock for the next year.

    This is not a "difference of opinion", they are polar opposites.

    Perhaps my problem is only with fools' contuned use of superlatives in their writings. (Hyperbole should have no place here). Perhaps the Fool IS playing both sides of the street against the middle. Perhaps you are all under too strict a Deadline to publish something, ANYTHING.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1090422, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 11:28:59 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
SBUX $54.56 Down -0.20 -0.37%
Starbucks CAPS Rating: ***
MCD $91.05 Down -0.48 -0.52%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: *****
TGT $57.62 Up +0.37 +0.65%
Target CAPS Rating: ****
GMCR $25.31 Up +0.22 +0.88%
Green Mountain Cof… CAPS Rating: **
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
COST $84.48 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Costco Wholesale CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement