I Wouldn't Touch These Banks With a Cheap CDS!

When Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, the entire financial system plunged into cardiac arrest. On Monday, one measure of European financial-sector risk was close to the same level it hit the day Lehman bit the dust. And if you think that's purely a European phenomenon, you're wrong: Similar signs are visible right here in the United States. Investors in financial shares need to be mindful.

Default risk has risen
The following table shows the increase in the cost of insuring the debt of four of the "too big to fail" banks over the past 28 days:

Name

Cost of Insuring Bonds, 28-Day Change

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  )

63%

Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  )

46%

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  )

34%

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  )

19%

Source: Markit. Prices as of Feb. 1, 2010.

Investors are paying up for insurance on these financials' debt, indicating that the perceived risk of default has increased. Note that this has occurred even as the Obama administration has announced several major measures that are explicitly aimed at reducing the risk of large financials.

A legitimate guru on big bank stocks
CLSA strategist Christopher Wood, who predicted Japan's lost decade and the U.S. subprime crisis, cites two factors for his bearish outlook on European and U.S. financials in his Greed and Fear report. First, he expects the yield curve to flatten "when investors realize that the recovery in the West is not normal, and government bond yields, as a consequence, decline." This flattening will reduce the abnormal profits that banks are earning by borrowing short-term funds at zero and buying longer-dated securities.

Second, he thinks investors who are snapping up the shares of big banks aren't properly discounting the impact of looming regulatory change, "which at a very minimum is likely to mean structurally lower returns on equity." He continued, "This is because they are experts on finance, not politics."

Do valuations make sense?
According to data provided by S&P Indices, financials made up the best-performing sector in the S&P 500 from the March 9 market bottom through the end of 2009, with a 131% gain. Bank-share investors -- or prospective investors -- shouldn't let the euphoria of that result go to their head, though. Echoing Christopher Wood's warning, I recommend verifying that bank valuations still contain a margin of safety to account for financial and political risks. Alternatively, investors who are wedded to financials should consider regional and local banks as an alternative to politically toxic megabanks -- a conservative lender such as People's United Financial (NYSE: PBCT  ) can still be bought at book value, for example.

The Federal Reserve's policies are creating a new set of tangible risks for investors. Motley Fool Global Gains co-advisor Tim Hanson explains why it's time to get out now

If you're concerned about the threat of a long, weak recovery -- and other risks facing the economy -- focus on companies with sustainable dividend growth. The team at Motley Fool Income Investor can yield results. To find out their six "Buy First" stocks, take advantage of a 30-day free trial.

You can follow Fool contributor Alex Dumortier on Twitter; he has no beneficial interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 03, 2010, at 7:04 PM, rd80 wrote:

    Alex - Just curious why you didn't include the poster child for troubled banks - Citi - in the table.

    At least one of the major measures proposed by the White House - bank fees - may be intended to reduce systematic risk, but it would reduce cash flow available to pay debts. The new fees on each of the banks in your table will exceed a billion dollars a year if the plan is passes as proposed.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 12:36 AM, TMFAleph1 wrote:

    rd80,

    Thanks for your interest. Please see the response I left in the Comments section of the associated CAPS blog post:

    http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=336863&t=0...

    Best,

    Alex D

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1102222, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 9:00:34 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement