Recs

5

Pentagon to Northrop: Go Jump in a Lake

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Once upon a time, somebody wrote that: "The customer is always right." But it seems Northrop Grumman (NYSE: NOC  ) never got the memo. This week, it got a cold dash of the water of reality instead … right in the face.

Back in December, if you recall, we discussed Northrop's latest ultimatum to the Pentagon. Complaining about how the military has been running the KC-X aerial refueling tanker project, the aerospace titan lamented the department's "clear preference ... for a smaller aircraft." Northrop made a thinly veiled threat, alluding to "how important it is to the credibility of the ultimate KC-X tanker award that it be arrived at competitively."

And then Northrop made its play: "[A]bsent a responsive set of changes in the final RFP, Northrop Grumman has determined that it cannot submit a bid to the Department for the KC-X program."

Take that! And this!
In other words, unless Northrop's "customer" agreed to give more preference to "buy" what Northrop wants to "sell," Northrop would drop out of the competition, allowing Boeing (NYSE: BA  ) and its team of subcontractors -- Rockwell Collins (NYSE: COL  ) , Spirit AeroSystems (NYSE: SPR  ) , United Technologies (NYSE: UTX  ) , and Honeywell (NYSE: HON  ) -- to claim the prize uncontested. And presumably, due to the lack of competition, to overcharge U.S. taxpayers in the process.

It was a bold move ... and apparently, a fatal miscalculation.

You said what?!
Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Bob Gates informed Northrop in no uncertain terms that it had overplayed its hand. Responding to Congressional inquiries on how KC-X is progressing, Gates testified: "Obviously, we would like to have a competition for it and we hope that both companies will agree to participate. ...But should that not prove to be the case, we ... have to move forward ... [KC-X] been delayed too long. We need to get this thing started."

So give Gates credit for this much: He's blunt, but he's clear. There's no room for ambiguity in his statement. (Alan Greenspan he ain't.) We're going to finalize the terms on this thing by month's-end, Northrop. If you like the terms and want to bid, fine. If you don't ... then go jump in a lake.

Foolish takeaway
Advantage: Boeing.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor Rich Smith is does not currently own any stocks named above, but Spirit AeroSystems Holdings is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems selection. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 4:38 PM, FBEditorial wrote:

    EADS/NOC should shut the hell up and leave already:

    http://www.glgroup.com/News/Sole-Source-KC-X-Contract-Only-W...

    Sole source it and be done with it.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Koblog wrote:

    I guess it doesn't matter to the government that they actually already announced a winner for KC-X and gave many good reasons why the Northrop Grumman solution was clearly better.

    The Pentagon awarded the contract to Northrop Grumman. People were hired. Facilities were in place. Mangement teams were ready. The program began.

    Then the government reneged on the deal.

    The point of this "competition" is to keep it going until the favored contractor wins.

    Boeing is in Chicago. Hmmm. Who else is from Chicago?

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 2:00 AM, FBEditorial wrote:

    Facilities in place?

    The EADS/NOC team have no factory or any infrastructure in place to build any tankers.

    Boeing does.

    This competition has been a joke with the repeated baby-like whining from NOC and EADS demanding changes from the USAF.

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 3:27 PM, runtovictory wrote:

    Koblog, you are right.

    The facilities are in place, management teams were ready, and the program began.

    ALL IN EUROPE !!!!

    Northrop is nothing but the sheep's mask on the Airbus wolf and their job is to bolt on the "made in america" label after Airbus is done.

    Northrop USAF American Tanker ? what a total bunch of crap.

    1000 jobs in Mobile Alabama and 40,000 American jobs going to Europe to help with their economic recovery.

    makes total sense......IF YOU LIVE IN EUROPE OR MOBILE ALABAMA !!!

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2010, at 7:35 PM, FACTS4YOU wrote:

    UHHH - KOBLOG? Suggest you read the GAO report on the award you mentioned. In fact, the NOC-Airbus fell short in in several areas, which the AF decided to overlook. For example, the Airbus would NOT- repeat NOT meet the ' breakaway requirements " under certain conditions without a major redesign of certain power and structural requirements.

    The the AF gamed the MILCON requirements ( Field and ramp and support structures needed ).

    EADS-Airbus could have submitted a smaller plane more closely matching the 767. They chose early on not to do so. However, the NOC-Airbus version more closely matched the KC-10 tankers which in a few more years will have to be up for bid...

    Its as if the AF wants an 8 passenger van, and NOC says, no, we have this 25 passenger Bus instead. Forget that you cannot park it in many areas, and that it will not fit in your garage, and that it wont pass the other brand on the highway.

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2010, at 7:37 PM, FACTS4YOU wrote:

    UHHH - KOBLOG? Suggest you read the GAO report on the award you mentioned. In fact, the NOC-Airbus fell short in in several areas, which the AF decided to overlook. For example, the Airbus would NOT- repeat NOT meet the ' breakaway requirements " under certain conditions without a major redesign of certain power and structural requirements.

    The the AF gamed the MILCON requirements ( Field and ramp and support structures needed ).

    EADS-Airbus could have submitted a smaller plane more closely matching the 767. They chose early on not to do so. However, the NOC-Airbus version more closely matched the KC-10 tankers which in a few more years will have to be up for bid...

    Its as if the AF wants an 8 passenger van, and NOC says, no, we have this 25 passenger Bus instead. Forget that you cannot park it in many areas, and that it will not fit in your garage, and that it wont pass the other brand on the highway.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1103774, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2012 5:36:05 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:03 PM
NOC $60.21 Down -0.29 -0.48%
Northrop Grumman C… CAPS Rating: ***
SPR $24.16 Up +1.08 +4.68%
Spirit AeroSystems… CAPS Rating: ****
UTX $83.78 Up +2.04 +2.50%
United Technologie… CAPS Rating: ****
BA $75.90 Up +0.44 +0.58%
The Boeing Company CAPS Rating: ***
COL $58.99 Up +0.13 +0.22%
Rockwell Collins,… CAPS Rating: ***
HON $59.89 Up +0.02 +0.03%
Honeywell Internat… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement