Recs

9

No Time for Anything But Facebook

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

There aren't many targets left on Facebook's hit list.

Web traffic watcher Compete.com released its data for the month of January last week. The big nugget: Facebook has overtaken Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO  ) to become the country's second most popular website.

Attracting nearly 134 million unique visitors last month is impressive, but the real prize here is that we know that folks are spending a ton of time on the social-networking site. They're playing social games, sharing digital snapshots, and keeping tabs with friends and family through status updates, private messages, and online chat.

We all know how Facebook's stickiness bodes well for the dot-com darling. How about the stocks that won't be as fortunate? If someone is spending hours tending to their crops on FarmVille or chatting with a former colleague, where did that time come from? It obviously isn't incremental, so there have to be some companies -- and investors should note that there have to be some public companies -- on the losing end of the Facebook bonanza.

I'm going to go over four companies losing out because of the time-suck that is Facebook. Then I'll hand it off to you to suggest some other potential losers.

GameStop (NYSE: GME  )
I've been down on the video game retailer for some time -- and rightfully so. It's not just that 2009 was a bad year for the video game industry. When the sector bounces back, a good chunk of that will come from digital distribution where console makers and some developers rake in the high-margin splendor but GameStop gets left out in the cold.

Now shovel over a heaping portion of Facebook over GameStop's grave.

Whenever I dismiss GameStop as a casualty of social gaming, diehard gamers let me have it. How dare I compare the petty social mob hits on Mafia Wars to the rich splendor of Grand Theft Auto IV or Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2? Master Chief and Big Daddy laugh at your virtual Pet Society critters.

This has never been the point. It's all about time. If folks are playing free ad-supported games online, it's less time for them to fire up their consoles and play. This dries up demand, and GameStop is an easy frontline kill.

Shutterfly (Nasdaq: SFLY  )
I've been a fan of the digital photofinishing site since before its IPO. I have a few of Shutterfly's photo books of family treks around the house. Unfortunately, it's easy for me to see that Facebook has now become the photo-sharing hub of cyberspace. Folks just don't need to order digital prints the way they used to, since cloud computing pioneers are perpetually hosting the images.

Shutterfly has held up well so far. Earnings grew faster than expected during the photo-sharing site's seasonally potent holiday quarter, with revenue soaring 22%. However, the company is targeting just 9% to 13% top-line growth in 2010. The company can't be immune to Facebook's digital photo dominance and the gradual decimation of photofinishing prints forever.

Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS  )
Everyone seems to be concerned about how the leading bookstore chain will hold up against Amazon.com's (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) Kindle and next month's debut of Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) iPad, but this isn't just about the e-book revolution (where it has a little skin in the game with its own Nook reader).

B&N's comparable-store sales during the holidays fell 5.4%. And, no, it didn't see this coming because the bleak Christmas forced it to hose down its guidance.

A bibliophile can argue that checking status updates and chasing links to interesting articles and video clips is no substitute for a good book. The bookie would be correct, but -- just as I explained in the GameStop thesis -- this is more about the quantity of time than the quality of the experience. If someone is chatting away with friends on Facebook at night instead of curling up to a mystery novel, you don't need to be a super sleuth to figure out that the person is going to go through fewer books.

Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA  )
Facebook vs. television? Yes, it's going to leave a dent. The country's largest cable company is already shedding video subscribers. It's making back that ground through broadband access and digital phone service, but those are competitive -- and cutthroat -- markets.

Comcast isn't going to go down without a fight. It is doing the right thing by spearheading the TV Everywhere initiative to make its cable subscriptions more valuable. The rub here is that if folks are spending more time on social networking site -- and less time on the boob tube -- it won't matter. The perceived value of a costly cable or satellite television subscription will continue to diminish.

Your turn
As promised, the ball is now in your court.

These are just four stocks that I think can be in for some heady turbulence if Facebook continues to draw in wider audiences that spend more and more time on the site. There are more. A lot more. Use the comment box below to share your candidates, or simply to dispute my theory.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Amazon.com and Apple are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services, free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz remembers when social networks were an offline endeavor. He does not own shares in any of the companies in this story. He is also a member of the Rule Breakers analytical team, seeking out the next great growth stock early in its defiance. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Uruzone wrote:

    I think you're right on the mark, Rick. The only thing I think might mitigate the finite quantity of time issue is the growing use of "time-shifting" devices like DVRs and subscription services. Sure, we might not sit down to watch TV at prime time any more, but we DO still watch those shows. We just do it on a date or time that's more convenient for us. The same MIGHT go for reading books, playing video games or, say, eating.

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2010, at 4:04 PM, thedigitalboomer wrote:

    Decent piece but I've got an issue with one of the comments you make regarding the threat of Facebook games on GameStop.

    When you say "it's all about time," you are making an assumption that some meaningful percentage of people playing any of the "Ville" or "Wars" or "Society" games on Facebook are the same people who play console games. If that's your thesis, where is the data to back that up? Last time I checked the "core" Facebook game player is a 43-year old female -- http://bit.ly/9aXR5N.

    So does your "share of time" argument really apply here?! Wouldn't it make more sense to focus on those companies who are losing out to Facebook on the traffic and time spent fronts - Yahoo!, MSN, AOL, etc.?

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2010, at 4:07 PM, EquityBull wrote:

    The real question in these metrics is not so much the total visitors or page views but the trend in time spent per user over time. If facebook is growing by adding people but the average page views or time spent online is decreasing once the novelty wears off is something to watch.

    Could facebook be another flash in the pan who's popularity wanes as people spend less and less of their spare time after their initial "rush" on the site? Something to be watchful of. I'd bet on them adding users and then plateauing while time spent online per user drops in the coming years.

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2010, at 4:50 PM, denisev1220 wrote:

    Two more stocks that I think are suffering are Real Networks and also Netflix. I dont even want to add up the hours that this household spends on facebook each week.

    We are definitely spending less time watching movies, or playing other games we used to buy from Real Arcade. Have actually considered cancelling both subscriptions.

  • Report this Comment On February 22, 2010, at 5:21 PM, AlanDanziger wrote:

    I wish you were wrong, but I resemble too many of your remarks...

  • Report this Comment On February 24, 2010, at 7:48 AM, dep82 wrote:

    What about people who have the TV on in the background while browsing Facebook? I rarely, if ever, am solely on the internet. I don't know of anyone who sits down and dedicates time to facebook or many websites the way they would a good book or a TV show. It's all about multitasking. And while I agree that shutterfly and B&N will take a hit, I doubt the core demographic of gamers spends as much time on facebook as others. If anything, Wii sales could take a hit, which would adversely affect Gamestop, but probably not as uniformly as you may think. Also, with games increasingly taking up more and more space (~20Gb for a PS3 Blu Ray Disc), broadband speeds and storage space have a long way to go before true digital distribution kills Gamestop and other middlemen. Platforms like Steam are taking over the PC industry, but that is a small proportion of sales compared to the now dominant consoles. Digital distribution may not truly take hold for another five years or so.

    And concerning Comcast, their phone and internet businesses aren't going anywhere. As long as they keep competitive triple play bundles, people will keep their cable subscriptions

  • Report this Comment On February 24, 2010, at 7:48 AM, dep82 wrote:

    What about people who have the TV on in the background while browsing Facebook? I rarely, if ever, am solely on the internet. I don't know of anyone who sits down and dedicates time to facebook or many websites the way they would a good book or a TV show. It's all about multitasking. And while I agree that shutterfly and B&N will take a hit, I doubt the core demographic of gamers spends as much time on facebook as others. If anything, Wii sales could take a hit, which would adversely affect Gamestop, but probably not as uniformly as you may think. Also, with games increasingly taking up more and more space (~20Gb for a PS3 Blu Ray Disc), broadband speeds and storage space have a long way to go before true digital distribution kills Gamestop and other middlemen. Platforms like Steam are taking over the PC industry, but that is a small proportion of sales compared to the now dominant consoles. Digital distribution may not truly take hold for another five years or so.

    And concerning Comcast, their phone and internet businesses aren't going anywhere. As long as they keep competitive triple play bundles, people will keep their cable subscriptions

  • Report this Comment On February 25, 2010, at 8:41 AM, acosta21 wrote:

    am i the only one that thinks facebook is a fad and is only going to last until someone better comes along look how myspace is dropping. Im just saying facebook only sounds good for the next 3 to 5 years but ill be surprise if it gets that far.

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Acesnyper wrote:

    Social networking sites are a plague on this planet. I've said so since the start. I know I'm the last person with out one, even more so an educated 20 something with a good job. But I just find them creepy to be honest.

    I know my words are a lot harsher then the writers but it's just nice to see that other people see, even if it's their cup of tea to use one, they are causing real damage to real people by taking away from free time. Free time being where people tend to spend money to amuse them selves.

    I won't even get into how it's been socially detrimental. But I'm just rather happy to see, someone else get that things like this are bad news for not just our human interactions but the economy as a whole.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1117726, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 9:50:56 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 34 minutes ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
YHOO $15.36 Up +0.01 +0.07%
Yahoo! CAPS Rating: **
CMCSA $28.85 Down -0.08 -0.28%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: **
GME $19.52 Up +0.35 +1.83%
GameStop CAPS Rating: **
SFLY $24.86 Down -0.28 -1.11%
Shutterfly, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
BKS $17.23 Up +0.19 +1.12%
Barnes & Noble, In… CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement