Don't let it get away!
Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.
Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.
I know, that doesn't sound terribly inspiring after Cisco's pre-announcement buildup in the grand tradition of Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL ) . But there is a real payoff here, and Cisco isn't lying about the CRS-3 carrier router's potential impact on the future of networking.
The CRS-3 is a drop-in replacement for the older CRS-1 and customers can reuse much of their existing infrastructure around an upgraded router. This is not the kind of machine you'll see in the networking room of a medium-sized business or a community college, but the type that knits the worldwide Internet backbone together. Any improvement in back-end switching capacity will eventually translate into faster and more responsive networking overall.
There are about 5,000 CRS-1 systems installed worldwide today, and Cisco would obviously like to see all of them updated to CRS-3 machines. AT&T (NYSE: T ) seems enthusiastic about the new hardware, and rivals like Verizon (NYSE: VZ ) , Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S ) , and Level 3 Communications (Nasdaq: LVLT ) should be looking into upgrades as well. And on the other side of the tracks, you have to assume that Juniper Networks (Nasdaq: JNPR ) is busy working up an answer to Cisco's CRS-3.
The new model can handle three times the traffic of the Cisco system it replaces -- using the same floorspace footprint and less power. As Cisco puts it, this router can transmit a digital copy of every motion picture ever filmed in less than four minutes, or the entire printed contents of the Library of Congress in about a second. Nobody really needs that kind of capacity today, but Cisco envisions and wants to be a part of a future where such hyperactive networks are commonplace.
In the long run, this new generation of networking infrastructure will let the network do tricks we can't even imagine today, like feeding high-definition video to a billion smartphones at once. It's not an immediate difference-maker for Cisco or anybody else, but a long-term positive for any business that cares about high-speed networking.
Who do you think will benefit the most from faster and better networking? Share your thoughts in the comments below.