Recs

97

An Inside Look at the Boom and Bust of Real Estate

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

The article below is an interview with CAPS member FloridaBuilder2, who is not a representative of The Motley Fool.

In August 2007, a mysterious blogger who called himself FloridaBuilder2 started to post a series of blogs on Fool.com about the collapse of the real estate market. Armed with data that only an industry insider could have, he identified the builders he thought would be hit with a wrecking ball versus those he thought would survive the bursting of the real estate bubble. His blogs immediately caught fire within the Fool community, and more than a few homebuilder executives wondered what his agenda was.

He accurately predicted the demise of some of the most troubled homebuilders -- including bankruptcies for ToUSA Inc., Orleans Homebuilders, and WCI Communities. His top hold pick, NVR Inc. (NYSE: NVR  ) , was up 34% during the worst residential real estate crisis since the Great Depression. And then he announced that he was retiring from blogging until it was time to start talking about a rebound in real estate.

Well he's back to blogging, and we thought it would be a good idea to revisit the crisis of 2007/2008 with him and discuss the outlook for homebuilders over the next three years. 

Motley Fool: You built your reputation at The Motley Fool by identifying the best and worst homebuilders after the real estate bubble burst. What was your role in the industry?

FloridaBuilder: Mainly I was responsible for doing the pro forma write ups for land acquisition deals. I worked with builders in Tampa, Orlando and The Space Coast. As a CPA, I had two skills that made me successful:

  1. I understood the value of the land and the expected rate of return for my clients.
  2. I could manipulate input data to get the results that would be approved by corporate headquarters.

The more I was pressured to perform skill No. 2, the more I knew the industry was in trouble. Of course, trouble creates opportunity. After the market collapse, I also ran pro formas for private equity and understand what distressed buyers expect as a return on investment.

Motley Fool: During the meltdown, you seemed to have insight into strategies of public builders that typical Wall Street analysts missed or certainly don't disclose. Why doesn't Wall Street do a better job of covering the industry?

FloridaBuilder: Four years ago most of the Wall Street analysts were clueless about the industry. However, the downturn has forced the best analysts to really get a strong grasp of how the industry works. The best analysts today have a much better understanding of how various strategic decisions drive the income statement and balance sheet of home builders -- and of the risk/reward of various development strategies. For example, insiders know that all the risk is in land and not in the homebuilding. NVR is a pure homebuilder that only options the land and thus didn't get burned in the downturn. Too many analysts overlooked this type of distinction prior to the meltdown.

It's critical for investors to understand that you CANNOT simply take macro industry data and extrapolate to individual companies without diving deeper into the business practices of a particular builder. Compare the business models of Pulte (NYSE: PHM  ) and MDC Holdings (NYSE: MDC  ) . Pulte homes believes in huge land plays that generate large up front negative cashflow that pays off when the housing market is on an upswing with outsized gross margins. MDC, on the other hand, never buys more than 2 years of finished lots, doesn't develop land, and thus doesn't get the gross margin expansion of Pulte because they are only obtaining builder profits, whereas Pulte obtains both a builder profit and land development profit in every house sold. So you can see how macro conditions will impact Pulte and MDC quite differently.

Motley Fool: Now that the bubble has popped, what condition is the real estate industry in? What's your outlook for the next 1-3 years?

FloridaBuilder: A few submarkets are actually seeing improvement today because they are Grade A locations. However, I think residential real estate is going to have a choppy bottom that won't see a sustainable upturn until 2012. People are in for a rude awakening when they find out the huge rally we saw in residential housing was a result of the government buying down mortgage rates and tax credits. There was also a lot of investor activity (cash buyers) buying homes and renting them.

The bottom line is that the industry can't grow until foreclosures subside. January was not a good month for new home sales (which is the real indicator of industry health not existing home sales). Home prices aren't headed higher (minus inflation) in 2010, and I think you are going to see some homebuilders miss their earnings outlook. I know of several public builders who are already nervous about what they told Wall Street and what is actually happening after 2 months -- because there is so much uncertainty in the economy.

Motley Fool: How much is the government propping up the industry?

FloridaBuilder: It's a massive prop job ... When I read macro data I think it is not giving enough credit to government intervention -- and this is confirmed by my industry contacts. Although there was real demand, you have to understand that we pulled forward a lot of that demand. I understand this concept from my days in the auto industry. Watch what happens when the government stops buying down interest rates and eliminates the tax credit.

Motley Fool: When the real estate crisis occurred, you helped Fools determine the winners from the losers by walking through the process of dissecting builder writedowns, housing starts, lots owned, price of bonds, cash on the books, and most importantly analyzing location. Is there anything in addition to these key factors that investors should be focusing on for recognizing when the recovery is under way?

FloridaBuilder:  Fools should be focusing on the following going forward: Quarter-over-quarter community count. D.R. Horton (NYSE: DHI  ) , Meritage Homes (NYSE: MTH  ) , and MDC Holdings have been very aggressive in growing communities.

Debt is important but only comes in play the longer the industry is sucking wind. And companies with land positions beyond three years are subject to future write downs -- companies such as Pulte, Lennar (NYSE: LEN  ) , Beazer Homes (NYSE: BZH  ) , Brookfield Homes, and Avatar Holdings. People don't realize that almost all of the write downs were finished buildable lots. Many of the builders haven't even begun to write down the raw land that they bought at the peak.

So, quarter-over-quarter community count, debt, and land positions held beyond three years; those are three big ones.

I cannot emphasize enough that if a person did a chart with the community count of each homebuilder quarter-over-quarter, that this indicator alone would be the main key to stock price appreciation. 

Motley Fool: Which builders now look like best buys? Who should we avoid?

FloridaBuilder: Avoid Meritage Homes, which had been [one of] my top outperform picks on CAPS. They are making huge strategic blunders right now and Wall Street is going to punish them. Look for some of the top analysts to downgrade it. Pulte is saddled with really deep positions of land and this is going to be a constant drag on earnings. By deep I mean this. Would you rather own 10 communities with 100 lots each, thus 10 selling efforts? Or would you rather own one community / selling effort with a lot of overvalued land 1,000 lots deep. Pulte has big land positions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I believe the market is going to eventually have a nasty correction and I would buy MDC Holdings, M/I Homes, Standard Pacific, or NVR. Just note that my opinion changes each year based on the execution of their various strategies.

Right now all the builders are overvalued except for MDC.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

FloridaBuilder2 owns no shares in the companies mentioned above. Head over to CAPS and check out FloridaBuilder's latest outperform and underperform picks. You can check out FloridaBuilder's Motley Fool CAPS blog here. Meritage Homes is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. MDC Holdings is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy never got caught up in the whole real estate hoopla.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 5:36 PM, TopAustrianFool wrote:

    FloridaBuilder2 tells an interesting story. I am going to side with the idea that he knows what he is talking about since some of the key things he mentions are realistic. Like how much govt intervention has skewed the market. You just don't inject $0.5T to $1T into the market and expect no inflation. The inflation is effectively confined in bank and real estate, for now.

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 7:23 PM, BIGSHCLUNK wrote:

    Please explain how the risk is in land and not home building. I know well of the CCI disaster , Jade builders ect. Yes I am a landowner in SW Florida...

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 7:30 PM, TopAustrianFool wrote:

    I believe he speaking that in real estate the companies that move land will have problems outperforming the market. I don't think that you having land is a problem for you.

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 9:07 PM, floridabuilder2 wrote:

    BigShclunk,

    Virtually all the bankruptcies in the homebuilding industry were related to the overpayment of land investments. Land is a residual value of the total homebuilder pro-forma model. When you drop pricing power 50% and sales pace 80% a homebuilder still expects to make 17-22% gross margin and 20% plus IRR. Thus, the housing collapse crushed land values.

    A builder who had no more than a two year supply of finished lots at the bubbles peak and no raw land was hurt but not buried (if they had 1/2 a brain when it came to company finances). These asset light builders can go back into the market today and strike deals that generate profit on rolling takes. Optioning lots is extremely risk free vs. doing entitlement and development of land with large sums of money paid up front.

    I am buying lots for $10k on a monthly roll today in Florida (and no not in Fort Myers or some other death MSA). This is below the development cost of land. I have already pro-forma'd the deal at 18% gross margins and 20% IRR.

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 10:42 PM, silenceforus wrote:

    So floridabuilder, question: I'm a soldier moving to the D.C. area, and have been considering buying a home.

    Smart or bad idea? I know this isn't your job, just thought you could point me in a smart decision direction.

    I don't think I'll take too much of a loss as the year plays out, especially in the D.C. area where housing is important. I am considering making an offer this month but again, not 100% on anything. Thought you could shed some light on the general housing market for a small joe such as myself.

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 10:49 PM, silenceforus wrote:

    FloridaBuilder2

    Question: I'm a solder getting moved to the D.C. area nd am considering purchasing a home. I'm also an avid investor. I've been thinking it was time for me to purchase a place, and D.C. seemed (inflated) but a safe bet as far as property goes.

    What do you think, for an average joe such as myself, of purchasing a property now? (my first home btw) Smart choice, unwise choice? I dont mind losing a little bit this year, if it flattens out next year or the year after, and grows after that. Just not sure where the markets going and if the downhill slope is starting to level out.

    Any tips or suggestions for me? I'm considering making an offer at the end of the month for a home.

    Thanks alot

    Matthew

  • Report this Comment On March 29, 2010, at 11:44 PM, floridabuilder2 wrote:

    That is a tough question.... If you were buying in any area outside of DC I probably would give you a resounding yes... However, DC has not been hit very hard and I consider it still overvalued. I don't think DC will get to an undervalued position in this cycle.

    My best friend is in the Army and returning from Iraq to DC. I told him to rent, but his wife would have none of that. Does the Army pay for the sales commissions if you have to relocate? If yes, then I guess I would lean towards buying... Also, DC has dozens of submarkets so it would depend on which submarket you are looking at.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 7:54 AM, thebest12211 wrote:

    Five to six years ago AM Weiss railed against the impending housing/mortgage crisis and how it would bring down the economy. The numbers were all there for anyone that wanted to look but just like with the Dot Com economy of the mid 90s, too many folks were making too much money for anyone to want to change the status quo.

    With specific regards to housing, there were only two numbers that folks had to see to know that housing was going to collapse: Income for the last 10 years was flat (for the average worker) and housing prices rose every year. This was unsustainable and it shouldn't have taken a PHd of an AM Weiss to see that things would fall.

    In the biggest of big pictures, when the Republican Party ceased to be the party of business and joined forces with anti abortion ideologues to win elections, the results were not going to be pretty.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 9:13 AM, cummingsr wrote:

    florida builder..

    no mention of KBH or TOL..........would greatly appreciate your take on their prospects. Thanks.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 12:07 PM, floridabuilder2 wrote:

    I like KBH 6th behind the four mentioned above and behind TOL. My problem with KBH is that they fire sold a lot of positions in 2009 to get sales pace. That is fine if you have grade A and B locations to replace those communities, but if you read my recent blog this is not the case. So KBH used to be one of my top 3 builders, but I feel they made a strategic blunder blowing through their lots like they did in 2009.

    I like TOL behind SPF and MHO... MDC is overpaying for land today because of the constraints on A and B locations (again read my most recent blog) and NVR is a little ahead of itself as far as stock price goes. Wall Street is not rewarding TOL today and I expect TOL to be undervalued in the next stock market correction.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 2:14 PM, plange01 wrote:

    with the US now 15 months into a depression for all the endless talk the problems in real estate have not even started.over the next 3-5 years you can expect to see prices and sales fall by as much as 80%....

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 3:02 PM, ReadEmAnWeep wrote:

    Plange01, god I hope so. That is when I will be looking to buy a house.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 4:43 PM, polenium wrote:

    I wonder if this writer might be connected with the infamous Lennar Corp. who is/was based in Florida. It is the largest or second largest housing corporation in the US.

    They filed for bankruptcy protection in 2009. They are a shoddy construction company that specializes in building on toxic sites, including their own dump.

    Erin Brockovich was after them.

    With the help of Nancy Pelosi's nephews, one an employee of Lennar (now Morgan Stanley who owns the controlling interest in Lennar) and the other the Mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsome, they winkled billions of dollars of publicly owned land away from local communities and tax payers. At Mare Island, they left taxpayers on the the hook for their co-payments and completion of a project they started. They are in the process of "clearing" the last community of color in San Francisco by failr means and foul (mostly foul).

    Investors need to be careful that they don't support industries that do harm.

    They own most the buildable land in the Bay Area, some of the priciest real state on the planet.

    These companies distort the housing market, fleece their customers and are an anathema to the US economy. Because of their powerful friends in Congress, they are inviolate.

    Investors should beware that the companies they support with their dollars don't engage in harming the society in which they operate.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2010, at 10:34 PM, aangelis7 wrote:

    Hey silenceforus

    I am a northern VA resident, and I just sold a house (for WAY under what it was worth!) in Vienna. Having been through this and having watched the housing market for a while, I can give you a few insights.

    A major reason that the DC area hasn't been hit as hard (although it seems plenty hard to me) as some other areas is that we have a more stable housing market because of the Federal Government. That being said, there are plenty of foreclosures around here, but not nearly as much as in other areas.

    Am I wrong in thinking that the Govt will pay closing costs when you arrive and leave?

    There have been some incredible deals in foreclosed properties. But even so, my home was in cherry condition and I still had to cut the price down by almost $100K. The house was put on the market in July and closed in December. I think if you are able to buy a home under foreclosure and do some sweat equity work on it, you may come out ok in a couple of years. But if you will only be in the area for a single two-year tour, it might take longer to sell than you are willing to wait. If I were you, I sure wouldn't want to get stuck under a higher interest rate, and from what folks are saying, interest rates will be going up.

    Over all, if the opportunity hits you on the side of the head, it might be worth it. But I'd be very cautious. We are still seeing a slow drop in existing home values here.

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2010, at 12:02 AM, georgiabrick wrote:

    Question for FloridaBuilder2:

    I own a piece of property that is over 150 acres in an "A" location that is paid for. The property was approved for residential lots but never developed. I would like to sell the property in the next few years and retire. My question is this.... Should I sell the property as approved/entitled lots or pay the money and apply for the permits, have them engineered and sell? Or, would it pay to fully develop some of the lots and sell a fully developed section at a time? In other words, what are the majority of most large scale builders looking for in today's market?

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2010, at 9:18 AM, floridabuilder2 wrote:

    georgiabrick,

    First A location in what MSA? Also, if you comfortable telling me the submarket within that MSA it will help.

    Builders right now only want finished lots period as a general rule unless you provide me more clarity above. By next year if you actually do have an A location the market will heat up for partially to fully entitled raw dirt. If you continue to add value to those entitled lots then you will get paid back with profit on them.

    Read my latest blog post on the state of public builder balance sheets.

    However, as a land owner.... all land owners think they have A location property so I am leery of what you state. I public builder will take a B or C location within an A submarket today vs. an A location within a C submarket if that makes sense. Don't get tripped up with rose colored glasses, I will give you my honest opinion if the land is in Phoenix, Vegas, Houston, Florida, California, Atlanta, Chicago or Detroit... most of the other markets I don't have as much knowledge on

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2010, at 1:43 PM, hokiebigdog wrote:

    Floridabuilder,

    Quick question. You mention "the good analysts". Which analysts in homebuilding do you think understand the business and are making the right calls? Who don't you like. Thanks

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2010, at 3:50 PM, floridabuilder2 wrote:

    The top 3 in the following order are

    Sood - Deutsche Bank

    Rehaut - JP Morgan

    Oppenheim - Credit Suisse

    these are the only 3 that you should even consider listening to as far as analysts go.. Nishu is the most bearish of the three... all the other analysts in the industry are morons.... Trust me on that

  • Report this Comment On April 02, 2010, at 3:43 PM, MKArch wrote:

    Florida,

    I agree that the new home builders business won't pick up again until the flood of defaults (motivated sellers) eases up. As a LEN shareholder I know they are literally sitting on the sidelines waiting for the foreclosures to clear out. If I understand your argument about the builders being overvalued right now it seems to assume without government assistance the housing market is permanently impaired or at least impaired for long enough to matter to anyone interested in owning a home builders stock.

    Right now new home starts are at an all time unprecedented low of ~0.5M/ year pace 1/3 of normal and what some have projected as natural demand. Before the current recession new home starts never (50 years on record) dipped below 1M although they hit ~1M in 1992. they generally range from low to high 1M's averaging around 1.5M. In 2008 they hit 0.8M and 2009 was ~0.55M with the start of 2010 about the same as 2009.

    Also if you look at the large public new home builders performance over the last decade vs. new home starts in general as a proxy for the entire new home building industry the large public builders sales growth far outpaced new home starts growth. 2000 home starts were ~1.6M at the height of the bubble they hit ~2.2M but averaged ~2.0M. The home builders revenues went up 3X-4X over the same period. In fact a sample of the large public builders I looked at recently had 2009 revenues ~2/3 of 2000 revenues while home starts are at 1/3 of 2000 levels. It looks to me like the large public builders were taking huge market share and probably are increasing it today although in a severely depressed market.

    How do you see the new home building market in general doing going forward (and why) in terms of new starts. How do you see the large public builders doing (and why). In particular I'm interested to see if you are predicting some sort of new norm in new housing starts/ sales going forward and if so why.

    My own view is that the housing market has survived all kinds of economic turmoil in the past and remained pretty healthy and that the current mess is just a needed correction after a particularly frothy bubble but the market will get back to it's long term normal pace over the next few years. New home starts will triple just getting back to long term average levels and it looks like the builders could outpace new home starts. To me they look undervalued and my guess is that's why they all jump on any hint of a rebound in the housing market.

    Also just for context the new home market is only ~15% of the total home sales market with existing homes making up the bulk of the market and it looks like the amount of homes produced above the 1.5M average during the bubble roughly equate to the amount below 1.5M from the 1990 housing related recession in fact the highest new home starts year in the recent bubble wasn't even the highest on record, it looks like 1972 was the most starts. What say you?

    Mike

  • Report this Comment On April 02, 2010, at 6:01 PM, MKArch wrote:

    http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=28122...

    You may have better information but here is an M* article on the natural demand for housing. At the end of the article is a chart of housing starts over the last 50 years but the article came out before 2009 so 09's ~0.55M starts are not represented. My argument for the builders is that there were periods of severe economic turmoil over the 50 years covered by the housing starts stats but starts have always managed to rebound fairly quickly. Yes the recent bubble was pretty frothy but the pull back in starts over the last couple of years has been equally severe, in the end the pendulum should swing back to the middle.

  • Report this Comment On April 06, 2010, at 4:52 PM, floridabuilder2 wrote:

    new home starts over the course of 5 year will drift back to 1.2 million starts. We are probably going to be in the mid 300s this year plus or minus 50k.

    new private homebuilders with fresh capital and no legacy assets will benefit the most (that is me).

    public builders with lots of cash will benefit 2nd most

    private homebuilders that have survived and are well capitalized will benefit 3rd

    everyone else will me dead in the water

    public builders have increased market share consistently over time. My expectation is that will continue. publics may have 20% market share plus or minus a few points today. However, there are limitations on how much market share publics can obtain because they aren't going to build in areas where the demographics aren't good.

    public homebuilding stocks got ahead of their share price and if you look at my blog the last month or two I have been throwing many warnings out based on my contacts throughout the industry. Gee and look the analysts come out with a lot of downgrades today (april 6th) 24 days after I put out a huge warning.

    if you want more insights from me I suggest reading my blogs in the last 18 months that relate to builders (not banks or housing bears)... if you want to continue the dialogue I will be talking nothing but builders for the next year or so.

  • Report this Comment On April 07, 2010, at 8:06 PM, georgiabrick wrote:

    for Florida Builder....

    What are your thoughts on The greater Charleston and Mrytle Beach areas in SC? They have low labor costs and area beaches, tourism, etc. Industry is moving in (Boeing ramping up to build the 787 dreamliner) Money Magazine had them as one of the top 10 markets in the US.

    If they could only get gambling in Mrytle Beach!!!!What say you?

  • Report this Comment On April 10, 2010, at 3:18 PM, MKArch wrote:

    Unless I'm missing something it looks like your blogs have all disappeared Florida. I'm from the construction industry but not a CPA specializing in the home builders. I don't know if I necessarily agree with everything you say but I have a healthy respect for you and was interested in following your thoughts. I don't know if the missing blogs is a technical glitch or you said a little too much or I'm just a dope and they are there but I can't find them but I was looking forward to following along and maybe delicately debating you once in a while.

  • Report this Comment On April 10, 2010, at 3:36 PM, MKArch wrote:

    testing 123, testing 123

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2010, at 1:38 PM, jsneesby wrote:

    MKArch, I share your concern for FB2. I hope this isn't an issue of free speech; that would just further shame MTH.

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2010, at 1:40 PM, jsneesby wrote:

    huh?

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2010, at 4:30 PM, banjr wrote:

    FloridaBuilder2 has chosen to lower his profile. He explains here http://tinyurl.com/yyc5o5v

  • Report this Comment On April 15, 2010, at 5:13 AM, newty74 wrote:

    g'day floridabuilder2,

    what are your thought about buying shares in land sydications? Actually anyone who knows how this game is played feel free to speak up.

    I got dragged into an investment presentation by Walton International. They're based in Calgary Canada with holdings all over Canada & the US.

    Based on my quick analysis its virtually a no lose deal for the company. They buy land, mark it up and sell it to me and you the investors. They spend a few years getting the city to approve their plan and put in the plumbing. Then finally they pay us our returns when they find a developer to buy the land. They advertise a 15% compound rate of return based on their past projects for us the investors. I'm sure Walton earns more than we do.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1139059, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 10:15:40 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 59 minutes ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
MDC $28.87 Up +0.42 +1.48%
MDC Holdings, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
MTH $29.97 Down -0.25 -0.83%
Meritage Homes CAPS Rating: **
NVR $832.53 Up +11.90 +1.45%
NVR, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
PHM $9.33 Down -0.07 -0.74%
PulteGroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
BZH $2.64 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Beazer Homes USA,… CAPS Rating: *
DHI $17.01 Down -0.14 -0.82%
D.R. Horton, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
LEN $28.20 Down -0.06 -0.21%
Lennar Corp CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement