In a plot twist to rival Groundhog Day, Yahoo!
The meandering dot-com is negotiating the purchase of a rising star in the Web 2.0 world, a few years after it let a similar opportunity slip through its purple fingers.
Right now, the target is Foursquare, according to BusinessInsider.com's Silicon Alley Insider. A source tells the blog that Yahoo! is in negotiations to buy the location-based social check-in site for roughly $100 million.
If this sounds familiar, it's because Yahoo! was in talks to buy Facebook for roughly $1 billion four years ago.
Can you imagine Yahoo! today if it had nabbed the country's most popular website? It wouldn't have had to outsource its search-engine soul to Microsoft
Before we ask whether history is repeating itself, let's point out that Foursquare is no Facebook. It's a sticky app with thin smartphone support, but a rabid following. The number of people who will gravitate to checking in to certain places to earn badges and points may very well be limited to hip twentysomethings. Then again, Facebook was once just a Harvard coed network that reached out to other college campuses.
Facebook overcame the shortcomings of Friendster, News Corp.'s
If Foursquare is open to a deal this early in its growth cycle, it may realize that it's close to peaking in popularity. It may as well jump while there are still open arms waiting to catch it. Web 2.0 is loaded with shooting stars that let pride get in the way of buyout premiums.
Whether Foursquare is a true game-changer or just a passing craze, Yahoo! will have to make a few sexy acquisitions to remind investors that it's still a dot-com force. It had plenty of cash in the bank before its recent sale of HotJobs to Monster Worldwide
Given Yahoo!'s uninspiring quarterly performances lately, it needs to look beyond its organic potential. If not Foursquare, something has to change, unless Yahoo! wants its dismal history to keep on repeating.
Should Yahoo! buy Foursquare? If not Foursquare, who should it buy? Share your thoughts in the comment box below.