Everyone Hates Natural Gas

I'm not sure when it started in earnest, but the trend of independent producers dumping conventional natural gas assets is now firmly established.

At its investor day, EOG Resources (NYSE: EOG  ) announced a plan to sell $1 billion to $1.5 billion of "non-core natural gas properties" by early next year. This divestiture will not only support a stepped-up budget, but also help to push the company toward the 50/50 oil and gas production mix the firm has been targeting since at least last summer.

EOG was an early entrant in the North Dakota Bakken, and has more recently unlocked oily plays like the Barnett Combo and the Eagle Ford shale. In the latter play, the company estimates that it has total resource potential of 900 million barrels of oil equivalent. That's three times its estimated Bakken resource, and a pretty astonishing figure.

EOG's motivation to shift away from natural gas isn't hard to understand -- oil plays are a heck of a lot more profitable today. SandRidge Energy (NYSE: SD  ) CEO Tom Ward said his company, which recently acquired oil-focused Arena Resources (NYSE: ARD  ) , and other independents could make 10 times more money producing oil rather than gas.

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK  ) is now busily looking for new oil resource plays in the Rockies, a region it had historically knocked for its "political/environmental hassles." I guess the company is willing to be flexible on those issues in its quest to achieve a 20% liquids component in its heavily gas-weighted production mix.

Another leading independent, Canada's Talisman Energy (NYSE: TLM  ) , has just completed a series of asset sales totaling $1.9 billion, with natural gas accounting for 90% of the production mix. On an oil equivalent basis, the company received $44,000 per daily flowing barrel. Earlier this week, I calculated that SandRidge paid around $188,000 per barrel of daily production at Arena, which is actually oil. Oil equivalency is clearly theoretical when it comes to real-world transactions today.

The shale gas boom, which has dovetailed so inconveniently with a major slump in industrial demand, has really made life difficult for natural gas-weighted producers. If the pricing chasm persists or widens further, I would expect to see increasingly silly transactions by E&Ps desperate to get more oil into their production mix. Do I hear $200,000 per flowing barrel? $250,000? Going once.. going twice.. sold to the man in the 10-gallon hat!

Chesapeake Energy is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. Check out his CAPS profile or follow his articles using Twitter or RSS. The Fool owns shares of Chesapeake Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 09, 2010, at 4:13 PM, DJDynamicNC wrote:

    All that gas capacity has to be going somewhere. I'm interested in seeing who's buying what all these companies are selling. Natural gas may not be a profit machine, but it's a steady earner - and you're going to be seeing a dedicated war on oil use over the coming decades which natural gas may escape.

  • Report this Comment On June 07, 2010, at 12:15 AM, LuckyduckFool wrote:

    Something very interesting going on. Natural Gas is very expensive in Pakistan, Mexico... Pakistan is exporting... Is someone driving down Nat Gas on purpose in U.S. so they can "Take Over" these assests cheap??

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1148371, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/31/2014 12:32:14 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement