Recs

4

Defense Contractors Get a Dunking

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Secure your helmets and fasten your chin straps, defense investors. Defense Secretary Robert Gates is wielding the ax again.

It's been more than a year since Gates last drew a line in the budgetary sand, canceling big-ticket defense projects including Lockheed Martin's (NYSE: LMT  ) F-22 fighter jet, Boeing's (NYSE: BA  ) comprehensive Future Combat Systems project, and Northrop Grumman's (NYSE: NOC  ) missile defense shield. Unsurprisingly, defense stocks have suffered, lagging the wider S&P 500 since the bombshells started raining down last year.

Splish, splash we were taking a bath ...
This week, Gates lugged out another pail of cold fiscal reality and splashed it over anyone who'd earlier managed to avoid the Big Soak.

Querying aircraft carrier builder Northrop Grumman, he asked: "Do we really need 11 carrier strike groups for another 30 years when no other country has more than one?"

For armored-vehicle maker General Dynamics (NYSE: GD  ) , it was more like: What's this about the Marines wanting $13.2 billion for amphibious assault craft? If memory serves, it's been 65 years since we last asked 'em to go island hopping. And on the off chance they do need to cross the surf to attack some foreign land, is there a situation where Textron's (NYSE: TXT  ) and United Technologies' (NYSE: UTX  ) helicopters and transport aircraft wouldn't serve the purpose for most conceivable threats this side of China? Why float when you can fly?

In short, concludes Gates, amphibious vehicles may be neither "necessary [n]or sensible."

Gimme shelter
Clearly, trouble's a-brewin'. But as I've said in the past, when one multibillion-dollar defense door closes, another opens. So investors may also want to pay attention to a few concerns that Gates considers more crucial.

For example, the problem of increasing technological prowess among enemy missile forces. Gates warned that our lead here is rapidly "eroding." This calls into question both the wisdom of building $20 billion floating targets (aka aircraft carriers), as well as their survivability on a modern battlefield. And Gates has similar concerns about the risks posed by "stealthy submarines."

Seems to me, though, worries like these bode particularly well for one of Gates' favorite hatchet-throwing targets: Boeing. The company's just fielded its next-generation subhunter, the P-8 Poseidon. It's also got a new Free Electron Laser that's said to be just dandy for shooting down cruise missiles before they can get up close and personal with a Carrier Strike Group. As new problems surface, Boeing's got new solutions.

Weapons programs come and weapons programs go, but the opportunities offered by still-undervalued defense stocks remain.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

General Dynamics is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection. Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 04, 2010, at 4:00 PM, GETRICHSLOW2 wrote:

    MR GATES NEEDS TO CHECK HIS RECORDS.

    AMPHIB VEHICLES WERE USED IN BEIRUT, SOMALIA, DESERT STORM, AND OTHER RECENT CONFLICTS. THEY ARE ARMORED AND OFTEN MOUNTED WITH WEAPON AND COMM SYSTEMS AND CAN EVEN SERVE AS LIVING QUARTERS OR COMMAND CENTERS FOR A PERIOD OF TIME.

    A HELO WILL NOT DO YOU MUCH GOOD AFTER THEY DUMP YOU ON SHORE.

    SOMETIMES THE MEAR EXISTENCE OF THESE WEAPONS IS THE REASON WHY WE NEVER HAVE TO USE THEM.

    DISCLAIMER: I AM A MARINE VETERAN OF DESERT STORM AND A GD STOCK HOLDER.

  • Report this Comment On May 04, 2010, at 4:37 PM, twomuch2luz wrote:

    Here is something that I have been watching and now that Iraq is winding down, it needs to be watched. Corporations like Mantech, CACI, DynCorp, CSC and others that may derive a significant portion of there business and bottome line growth from working in a war zone will start taking hits soon as the DoD winds down in Iraq and perhaps Afghanistan next year. The reason is that average profit/fee allowed on stateside projects is generally 7 to 7.5%. Now risk weighted fees have been much larger in regions like the Middle-East; on the order of 30% higher with many at 10% and larger. It does not stop there. These larger fees these defense firms have been getting are on much larger salary and expense basis as you can imagine and have heard, no one works in the war zone without at least 50% greater salary. the bigger the salary, the bigger the hit to the company bottome line. watch for hits as soon as the forth quarter of this year and again next year as Afghan jobs wind down. The reset (overhaul of beat equipment) will not be quite as lucrative stateside.

    Now you know the rest of the story and I have been in this biz for 35 years. Be carefule with the medium and small sized defense firms that derive a lot of income from the wars.

  • Report this Comment On May 04, 2010, at 6:17 PM, TMFDitty wrote:

    Good comments so far. Keep 'em coming.

    @twomuch2luz: Do you see the risk primarily as one affecting the contractors providing civilian boots on the ground? How about companies like GD, which sell the armored vehicles used in Iraq, or Oshkosh and Force Protection, which upgrade and service them?

    TMFDitty

  • Report this Comment On May 04, 2010, at 7:00 PM, twomuch2luz wrote:

    Ahh, you asked the question I thought about discussing further TMF! You know a bit about the biz. I was going to say that GD and Oshkosh should continue to do well after the we depart the middle-east due to the reset business. GD is my favorite as the have an somewhat of a proprietary market as well as the retrofit of other's gear. Oshkosh's equipment, as well as Force protection and the like will have more competition for reset of their euipment as well as others by the then hungry DoD services contractors. The margins on this type of work will not be great either.

    Growth will be tough for some of those that did not plan and invest in other growth opportunities. It is time for real investors to start disecting the annual reports (at least those that are public-I think DynCorp is or will be in private hands soon) and find out where these guys are making their money before the herd does.

  • Report this Comment On May 07, 2010, at 12:45 AM, baldheadeddork wrote:

    @Getrichslow

    I think Gates has a point. We haven't done an amphibious landing into enemy fire since...Korea? It's something we've learned to avoid because coming ashore means you're fighting from a very vulnerable position and you're exposing yourself to a high casualty rate.

    But even if you take that out of the picture, the proposed new amphibious landing vehicle simply isn't designed to meet the needs of today's warfare. It can only carry 17 marines, it's main gun is just a 40mm cannon, and the potential order has already been cut back to 573 units because of cost overruns.

    We still need the ability to get Marines on shore, but I don't think this is it.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1173151, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 12:36:05 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 3 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
BA $70.00 Down -1.39 -1.95%
The Boeing Company CAPS Rating: ****
TXT $23.52 Down -0.26 -1.09%
Textron, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
UTX $73.02 Down -0.48 -0.65%
United Technologie… CAPS Rating: ****
NOC $58.50 Down -0.31 -0.53%
Northrop Grumman C… CAPS Rating: ****
GD $63.58 Up +0.24 +0.38%
General Dynamics C… CAPS Rating: ****
LMT $82.71 Down -0.66 -0.79%
Lockheed Martin Co… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement