Peabody Acquisition Bid Bites the Dust

Pulling off perhaps the most remarkable feat in the history of stage and screen, Linda Blair dazzled audiences by spinning her head full-circle 'round while portraying poor, possessed Regan in The Exorcist.

OK, maybe some old-school special effects were involved, but one company might really know what it feels like. Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU  ) has tried to keep its gaze fixed upon its Australian acquisition target Macarthur Coal over the past several weeks, even as the investment landscape for Australian coal mining has revolved upon its axis.

With the Australian government standing by its controversial proposal to enact a 40% super-profits tax upon the earnings of resource producers down under, Peabody abruptly retreated from its prior bid down to a $3.3 billion offer. After Macarthur announced last week the abandonment of a separate deal to acquire Gloucester Coal -- an explicit prerequisite of the Peabody offer -- the available signals suggested some hope for Peabody's revised bid. Just days later, however, the deal is now dead in its tracks.

As I have pointed out, the challenge to this deal all along has been for Peabody to placate the interests of Macarthur's three principal stakeholders: China's Citic Resource Holdings (which holds a huge 22.4% stake) and mega-steelmakers ArcelorMittal (NYSE: MT  ) and POSCO (NYSE: PKX  ) .

Conveying particular opposition from Citic on the basis that the offer stands well below the "long-term strategic value" of the underlying assets, Macarthur Coal opted not to proceed with a shareholder vote. Appearing to acknowledge the core source of opposition to the deal, Peabody responded that it was "unfortunate that one shareholder could block a proposal that would have created significant value for all."

Given the incredible lengths to which both public and private sector entities in China have gone to secure access to (and investments in) strategic resources, I believe that these moves were envisioned with a far longer time horizon than Peabody's proposal would have yielded.

On the other hand, Peabody included within its offer an avenue for each of the three stakeholders to maintain their equity interest in the Macarthur assets, so it's not as though they would have been locked out of the long-term earnings potential of the assets. Still, with leading producers BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP  ) and Rio Tinto (NYSE: RTP  ) holding the cards with respect to product pricing negotiations, major importers like China have a natural vested interest in minimizing the pace of consolidation among foreign miners.

To finally exorcise the acquisitive fever that the miner has caught now that Pan-Asian demand for seaborne coking coal and thermal coal has kicked into high gear, Peabody Energy may be well-advised to focus elsewhere in the Pacific basin (where 40% profit taxes are not on the political agenda). If the proposed tax passes, China's growth rate falters somewhat, or any number of scenarios conspire to fuel the ongoing near-term dip in the relevant resource sectors, then Peabody may ultimately find a more sweetly priced target for its acquisitive zeal.

The "Coal" tag in the Motley Fool CAPS community lists 29 companies. Find out what other investors are saying about the stocks you're watching, or share your Foolish thoughts with us. CAPS is free and fun!

Fool contributor Christopher Barker can be found blogging actively and acting Foolishly in the CAPS community under the user name TMFSinchiruna. He tweets. He owns shares of BHP Billiton and Peabody Energy. POSCO is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy just smiles and gives you a vegemite sandwich.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 1186136, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 8:40:37 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement