Recs

15

This Week's 5 Dumbest Stock Moves

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Stupidity is contagious. It gets us all from time to time. Even respectable companies can catch it. As I do every week, let's take a look at five dumb financial events from this week that may make your head spin.

1. Tracking the tracker
It's been rough to be comScore (Nasdaq: SCOR  ) these days. The Internet traffic watcher is taking body blows to its integrity after publicly admitting that it underreported Yahoo!'s (Nasdaq: YHOO  ) web traffic for the month of June.

It wasn't by a small amount either, as Yahoo!'s page views were off by more than a billion. The portal's stickiness was also underrepresented by a whopping 850 million minutes.

The irony here is that the validity of comScore's monthly search engine reports has been knocked around in recent months, with the web tracker accused of overestimating traffic at Yahoo! and Bing by counting contextual links and slideshow views as individual search queries.

2. K.O. in Tokyo
If Yahoo! finds its traffic undercounted in Japan, it may be its own doing. Yahoo! Japan has agreed to outsource its search to Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) , in a deal that seems eerily similar to Yahoo!'s pact of letting Bing fulfill its stateside queries.

The catch here is that Yahoo! Japan is actually that country's top engine. Didn't Yahoo! learn anything from its stateside history? It was the top dog here, too, until it leaned on Google for its searches. Outsourcing queries validates the provider at the expense of the originator's reputation.

If Google is publicly fulfilling Yahoo! Japan's requests, it won't be long before many of those users cut out the middleman, switching directly to Big G. Isn't that exactly what happened here several years ago?

3. Lighting the Kindle at both ends
Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) announced the third generation of its Kindle e-reader on Wednesday, helping explain why the second generation of its fast-selling gadget was mysteriously out of stock since Tuesday.

There's nothing inherently wrong with the new Kindle. It sticks with the recently reduced $189 price point, but adds greater storage capacity, a longer battery life, a superior screen, and a lighter, compact form factor. Amazon is also introducing a $139 Wi-Fi model without the more portable 3G digital delivery flexibility.

The rub is that Amazon won't be shipping these out for another month, so it's going to be out of the market on the hardware side through most of August.

The month-long delay also perfectly coincides with its 30-day return policy. Did Amazon fear that those who snapped up a Kindle earlier this month would be upset at being sold an obsolete and inferior Kindle and return them in droves?

Even if this is not the case -- and Amazon simply ran out of the second-generation gadgetry -- it certainly seems as if it was tricking consumers last week when it was rattling off a laundry list of metrics validating the Kindle in an attempt to clear out its now-dated inventory.

4. Identity theft? There's an app for that!
You can apparently be "too big to fail" in the banking sector, but still call up the fail whale in Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) App Store.

Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) revealed that its mobile banking application for Apple devices is saving personal account information in a hidden file on the phone, potentially compromising account numbers, access codes, and bill payments.

Citi fixed the bug in a recent update, but those who downloaded the original program aren't automatically required to upgrade. The inadvertent breach makes Citi look stupid, but what about Apple? Shouldn't the notoriously lengthy process to get some apps approved check for oversights like this?  

5. Black and blue berry
Research in Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) announced a long overdue update to its BlackBerry App World marketplace, and shares spiked on "iPhone killer" speculation after the smartphone pioneer scheduled a media event for next week.

Let's set aside the ludicrous notion that RIM could seriously catch up to Apple or even Google's Android in the app space now. Let's also dismiss the inanity of a BlackBerry handset -- as great as it may be for its corporate email and texting -- to be the mother of all consumer smartphones.

RIM makes the cut this week because tech blog MobileCrunch is reporting that the company acquired the BlackPad.com domain, presumably as the name of its upcoming tablet.

Worst. Name. Ever.

I know that the iPad seemed like a laughably ridiculous name at first, but Apple's ability to ooze style and illicit swoon like a Twilight heartthrob made it work. RIM, on the other hand, puts the pan and ache in panache. I'm hoping that RIM simply gobbled up the domain to avoid any confusion with the real name. PadBerry, TabBerry, and even BB Pad make far more dollars and sense.

Which of these five moves do you think is the dumbest? Share your thoughts in the comment box below.

Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Apple and Amazon.com are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of Google. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services, free for 30 days. That certainly wouldn't be a dumb move.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz is a fan of dumb and smart business moves. Investors can learn plenty from both. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Henry3Dogg wrote:

    "Citi look stupid, but what about Apple? Shouldn't the notoriously lengthy process to get some apps approved check for oversights like this?"

    No. It's Apple's role to look for malware, e.g. Viruses, Trojans..., check that things do what is described, and don't do things not described, e.g. Unexplained network traffic, and in the last resort, know who is responsible for the app. Then, if necessary, get it offline quickly of things go bad.

    It cannot be Apple's role to police the design and implementation of the internals of each App.

    In this case, Apple ensured that the app was from Citi. Beyond that, it's banking software so it's going to bank. It cannot be Apple's role to decide if you should trust your bank.

    That is like expecting your fire wall to stop a user who you have given a VPN connection, and an account on your server.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2010, at 11:32 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    Since Rim had been getting black eye after black eye from Android and Apple, I propose Rim calling their pad-to-be the BlackEyePad.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2010, at 11:41 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    For people who poked fun at Steve Jobs who gave the iPad to his astronomically influential and best-selling product, I suspect Steve was influenced by the IBM ThinkPad notebook computers which dominated the whole world for many years unrivaled in quality and engineering prowess.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2010, at 10:38 AM, michaelnesP wrote:

    Apple *does* inspect apps to the point where they check what data is being requested/delivered, saved & where. But it's entirely possible that the file which saves this proprietary data did *NOT* contain data points such as personal account data at the time they reviewed the app.

    That is, it may be that file was changed to include these data points later...which is really poor security design, yes.

    The fault should rely entirely on Citibank that they coded such nonsense. Agree with the comment above, even extend that analogy to include: it's like asking your webhost to scan all interactivity on your website, both before and after your site is published. It is not for Apple to police.

    But I don't expect random cell users to make that connection; it's a boring IT thing.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2010, at 10:47 AM, michaelnesP wrote:

    >None of these 5 even comes close to the fact that people actually have to read your crap.

    how constructive.

    anyway, yes a lot of crazy moves this week in the mobile space... steve ballmer stating "ipad sold more units than [he prefers]..." also indicating microsoft is going to "invade" [ :) ] this space. so you can add a 6th if you like.

    i read this like a quick recap of some of the funnier moments of the week. :)

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2010, at 1:19 PM, demodave wrote:

    I highly recommend these days that whatever you are saying (especially if it says best/worst/smartest) you include Apple to get us fans worked up.

    Just think. Citibank. Ya think they mighta had to *pay* a little $$$ to Apple to have an app? Maybe? ... $$$ ... ???

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2010, at 2:28 PM, demodave wrote:

    MillerFalls, I call BlacksPadSplotation.

    I wasted ten seconds of my life reading your BPS.

  • Report this Comment On July 31, 2010, at 4:00 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    Rim sells cheap worthless junk to people with cheap worthless tastes. Buying into the crazy idea of a Blackberry 'iPhone killer' is surely the dumbest stock move.

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Smorgasbord1 wrote:

    What is the point of Apple's approval process if not to protect iPhone users? If they are to be protected from nudity and maliciousness, shouldn't they also be protected from security lapses? The whole idea is that iPhone users have a secured walled garden to safely enjoy. If that garden isn't safe, then what's the advantage to having it walled in?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1253856, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2012 8:04:35 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,801.23 -89.23 -0.69%
S&P 500 1,342.64 -9.31 -0.69%
NASD 2,903.88 -23.35 -0.80%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/10/2012 4:00 PM
RIMM $15.44 Down -0.46 -2.89%
Research In Motion… CAPS Rating: *
SCOR $22.51 Up +0.46 +2.09%
comScore, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
YHOO $16.14 Up +0.14 +0.88%
Yahoo! CAPS Rating: **
AAPL $493.42 Up +0.25 +0.05%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
C $32.93 Down -0.74 -2.18%
Citigroup Inc CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $605.91 Down -5.55 -0.91%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
AMZN $185.54 Up +0.56 +0.30%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement