The Top Stock of Multimillionaires -- and 4 More Like It

Would you like to know how successful entrepreneurs, former partners of Wall Street investment firms and top executives at Fortune 100 companies have invested their personal wealth? Michael Sonnenfeldt knows the answers to that question.

Talking investments with the super-wealthy
Sonnenfeldt is the co-founder of Tiger 21, a peer network of 140 ultra-high-net-worth individuals who collectively control $10 billion in investable assets (i.e., the average member's assets exceed $70 million). These folks pay $30,000 in annual fees for the privileges of membership, first among which is the opportunity to access the collective investing intelligence of the group. Last week, Sonnenfeldt shared with Bloomberg the results of a member survey concerning their favorite investments.

Top stock: Berkshire Hathaway
Perhaps it's not a surprise that people who have created and sold businesses are drawn to Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) , a company built by the world's most successful investor-businessman, Warren Buffett. Beyond the enduring quality of the company's businesses, the stock's current valuation is attractive, as I highlighted last month in "Berkshire Hathaway is Extremely Cheap."

Four Berkshire 'clones'
Berkshire is unique in its success, but there are other great publicly traded companies that are built on uncommon investing acumen and a partnership culture. They include:

  • Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM  ) : Brookfield is a Canadian asset manager that owns and operates real assets (infrastructure, property, etc). Nevertheless, the principles they apply to asset selection are identical to the ones Buffett uses in picking stocks: Competitive advantage, cash returns and value creation are the criteria by which Brookfield evaluates any investment.
  • Leucadia National (NYSE: LUK  ) : Leucadia is a diversified holding company with interests in (among others): manufacturing, telecommunications, contract oil and gas drilling and gaming. The company also owns major stakes in two publicly traded companies (AmeriCredit and the Jefferies Group). Over the past 31 years, Leucadia has increased book value per share at an annualized rate of 18.5% -- nearly as impressive as Berkshire's performance over the same period (20.7%).
  • Loews (NYSE: L  ) : Loews' interests include three publicly traded subsidiaries in insurance, oil and gas drilling (Diamond Offshore Drilling (NYSE: DO  ) ) and gas pipelines. Current CEO James Tisch learned the art of value investing under his father Laurence Tisch, who co-founded the company with his brother Preston. Loews shares currently trade at a 10% discount to their book value, compared to an average premium of 12% going back to the beginning of 1993.
  • Markel (NYSE: MKL  ) : Specialty insurer Markel openly models itself on Berkshire Hathaway. Since its 1986 initial public offering, the company has increased book value per share at an annualized rate of 21.2%. In order to achieve this remarkable result, management focuses on generating underwriting profits and obtaining superior investment returns on its float from its insurance operations. Chief Investment Officer Tom Gayner is a respected value investor; in joining the board of The Washington Post in 2007, he is following directly in Warren Buffett's footsteps.

Top mutual fund: Fairholme Fund
The mutual fund that received the most mentions from Tiger 21 members is the Fairholme Fund, a $14.8 billion fund managed by Bruce Berkowitz, a devotee of Buffett-style value investing. Fairholme is highly risk averse – instead of focusing on how they will win, the Fairholme team spends a lot of time asking themselves how their investments could fail. This prudence has clearly served them well: According to Lipper, the Fairholme Fund has outperformed 99% of its peers over the prior five- and 10-year periods.

(Fairholme Fund's third largest position at the end of February (6% of assets)? Berkshire Hathaway. That's no coincidence.)

There is a common thread between investing in Berkshire Hathaway and the Fairholme Fund: The person with whom you are entrusting with your capital is absolutely committed to the preservation of your capital. Without achieving this initial hurdle, there can be no capital growth.

Invest like a (retired) entrepreneur
As much as entrepreneurs -- the core group of the Tiger 21 membership -- are risk-takers when they are creating a business, they tend to be much more risk-averse once they have sold a business. In that regard, we can all learn from the super-rich: In investing, one's first preoccupation must be to avoid losing money. Once that is assured, it is much easier to identify the paths to a satisfactory return.

When Buffett ran the Buffett partnerships, he earned monster returns investing in small-cap stocks. By virtue of Berkshire's size, he is now restricted to large- and mega-cap stocks, but he wishes he could buy these stocks.

Fool contributor Alex Dumortier has no beneficial interest in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. Berkshire Hathaway and Markel are Motley Fool Inside Value selections. Berkshire Hathaway and Leucadia National are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Brookfield Asset Management is a Motley Fool Global Gains recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Markel. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (7) | Recommend This Article (49)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2010, at 1:32 AM, dgmennie wrote:

    Can we please have no more articles from the Warren Buffet Fan Club at the Motley Fool? These reports are irrelevant to today's small investor. I would much rather hear about someone who started investing after the tech bubble popped in 2000, right through the real estate meltdown, and into the current financial crisis. A strategy that avoided disaster and actually created wealth during these years might have some relevance, especially if it was executed by somone WITHOUT deep pockets.

    All else is nostalgia for an era gone by that is unlikely to return in recognizable form. What you need to unearth is unconventional wisdom that the small investor can actually apply to the markets today. Unfortunately, stock investing newsletters across the board still fail miserably when this simple standard of value is applied.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Gregeph wrote:

    I disagree with the notion that these companies are not relevant. There is nothing wrong with looking for undervalued small companies or those with great growth prospects. These have the potential to deliver market-beating performance. Having said that, don't ignore what these super-sophisticated investors are doing. All the companies mentioned allocate capital very well and have strong management teams, along with a low risk a permanent capital loss. From time to time, they can be purchased at less than intrinsic value. For example see Goldman Sachs valuation of BRK at $171,235 (http://gregspeicher.com/?p=719).

    If an investor is knocking it out the park with smaller, more speculative stocks, then more power to them. For many, however, owning shares in the companies mentioned in the article may be a surer path to long-term wealth. http://gregspeicher.com/

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2010, at 9:25 AM, catoismymotor wrote:

    Alex,

    As a small investor I appreciate this article. I own one of the companies on this list and have been eyeing another for some time now. All the companies you listed should make a LTBH investor drool.

    Cato

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2010, at 12:01 PM, TMFAleph1 wrote:

    Thanks for these comments, everyone!

    dgmennie -- I agree that the Motley Fool produces a lot of articles about Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. However, I strongly disagree that the companies mentioned in this article -- even Berkshire, despite its size -- are irrelevant to individual investors today.

    Alex D

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2010, at 2:11 PM, eurotrash01 wrote:

    Note to self: Always heed investment opinion from those who can't even spell "Buffett."

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2010, at 12:48 AM, dgmennie wrote:

    some cartoon wisdom for eurotrash01:

    (Girl, about 8 years old, at home, talking on a cell phone.)

    "My broker says don't panic, I'm still young enough to recoup my losses."

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2010, at 2:49 PM, seacraft23 wrote:

    Why would she be paying a broker? Etrade buddy.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1256829, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 2:01:39 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement