Analytical firm Experian Hitwise claims that Bing-powered searches accounted for 24% of all queries during the first week of its deal with Yahoo!
Now, it bears pointing out that this is just one Internet traffic watcher's opinion. A couple of weeks ago, industry giant comScore
But no matter whose numbers you buy into, they would probably all agree that Microsoft has wasted valuable time in bringing Bing up to speed.
Three year ago, Microsoft executive Kevin Johnson was targeting roughly 35% market share in search and 40% in online advertising within three to five years.
Microsoft isn't close, and it's going to take a serious Google gaffe -- or a conscious retreat, as it has in all but yielding China to Baidu
And it's just not going to happen. Google commanded only 54% of the search market at the time of Johnson's comments. It may not have exactly been vulnerable at the time, but a combination of Yahoo! and Microsoft would have covered 31.5% of the queries at the time, according to Nielsen Online. The gap seems to widen with every passing year.
Sure, Microsoft tried. A few months after Johnson's comments, the Windows King made a bold bid to swallow Yahoo! whole. It failed, and most analysts argue that Microsoft dodged a bullet; it didn't have to overpay for Yahoo!, and now it gets to milk the cow cheaply.
Well, I don't exactly agree. In the nearly three years that it took this drama to play out, Google only got stronger and Yahoo! only got weaker. Microsoft's Bing was a welcome boost, but the end result is that Microsoft's goal of nabbing more than a third of the search market hinges on Google slipping.
Big G doesn't slip often.
Last week, Google entered into a new five-year deal that finds it fulfilling AOL's
You snooze, you lose -- market share.
Are you buying Internet stocks these days? Which ones? Why? Share your tips in the comments box below.