Recs

14

Roundtable: The Best News About the Future, and Reasons to be Optimistic

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Two months ago, if BP's (NYSE: BP  ) former CEO Tony Hayward so much as sneezed, it was practically front-page news. Anything even slightly related to the BP oil spill was covered in meticulous detail ad nauseum. The media just couldn't get enough of it.

Then came good news: The leak was finally capped. Yet the media barely yawned. Interest has almost vanished. Same with the Iraq war. You'll be forgiven for not knowing that the last combat troops just left Iraq (although plenty of non-combat troops remain). It was barely passing news.

Fear sells. Good news rarely does. That's the unfortunate truth about our media. So I asked a few of our analysts to share the best, most optimistic news that the media's not reporting on. Here's what they had to say.

Alex Dumortier, Fool contributor: Capitalism works -- although that should hardly be news to anybody. Furthermore, as Anatole Kaletsky delineates in his new book, Capitalism 4.0, it's an extremely adaptable form of economic organization. Although many members of the political class and the wider mediocracy have been busy delivering its eulogy, the reports of capitalism's death were an exaggeration. Just ask the Chinese -- they know full well it works.

Yes, there are some dysfunctions associated with financial capitalism, but this is not a new phenomenon. Our society has encountered periods of serious crisis before, some of which were painful and protracted, but we got through them and went on to achieve higher levels of wealth and standard of living.

I continue to believe that the effects of this crisis will be felt for years to come, and I don't think that stocks are wildly attractive at current levels. However, as U.S. households repair their balance sheets, and the pressure mounts on the U.S. government to do the same, the credit crisis could ultimately sow the seeds of more stable and sustainable economic growth (albeit at lower rates than we'd grown accustomed to). This weekend's decision by international banking regulators to require banks such as Bank of America  (NYSE: BAC  ) and Wells Fargo  (NYSE: WFC  ) to hold elevated levels of capital -- albeit with a drawn-out implementation calendar -- is a good start.

Nick Nejad, Fool contributor: On the last day of my International Trade class, UC Berkeley Professor David Roland-Holst shared with us a powerful idea: Just a few percentage points of world growth could cause some markets to double.

Don't believe me? Let's say 1% of the world can afford a Super-Duper Motley Fool Blender (while supplies last). Out of 6 billion people, that means a target market of 60 million. But if world GDP grows by 7% per year for four years, how many people can afford our blenders now?

Answer: 720 million. The market has grown 12-fold, assuming income is normally distributed. OK, world GDP growth may not actually be 7%. But you get the point. Small shifts on a bell curve can bring a tremendous wave of people into a market.

I like to put a deeper meaning to that. An executive recently gave a talk about how only 1% of Indians can afford to buy insurance (out of a population of 1.1 billion). That placed a tremendous hardship on their lives. They were always one flood or fire away from losing it all. In a few years, I'd like to think that several times as many Indians may be protected from that risk.

What makes me optimistic about the coming few years? The demand is set to soar for so many great and useful products. With any luck, exporters like General Electric will see their orders go up, and Americans will be hired to fulfill all that new demand.

Matt Koppenheffer, Fool contributor: One of the notable surprises for me over the past couple weeks was the strength in sales at major retailers.

Given all of the wailing about how consumers make up 70% of the economy, and that they're probably never, ever, ever going to buy anything at all ever again, you'd think that healthy sales numbers from retailers would get plenty of air time. Not so. In fact, had I not been tuned in to the Motley Fool Money radio show, I might have missed it altogether.

But I'm darn glad I didn't, because the numbers were well worth seeing -- same-store sales growth was 6.3% at Nordstrom, 2.3% at J.C. Penney  (NYSE: JCP  ) , and a whopping 10% at Limited Brands  (NYSE: LTD  ) . Heck, even beleaguered Abercrombie & Fitch  (NYSE: ANF  ) saw positive sales momentum.

Morgan Housel, Fool contributor: Two points. First, history is on our side in many ways. Events move in cycles. Good times tend to follow bad times, and vice versa. We just had a lost decade in stocks, which has indeed happened before. But even in the most wretched downturns, another consecutive decade of lost returns is extremely rare. Odds that the coming 10 years will be vibrant are much, much greater today than they were 10 years ago. That's what history shows.

Second, the job market might not be as bad as some make it out to be. The current monthly job-loss figures we hear about typically come from the Establishment Survey, which polls businesses on their hiring/firing activities. Another statistic is the Housing Survey, which polls households on their employment status. The latter survey's findings are pretty upbeat: The private sector has added a hefty 1.8 million jobs year to date, versus the stupor that shows up in the Establishment Survey. No one knows which survey is truly accurate -- actually, both are merely estimates -- but our overreliance on the Establishment Survey is probably overdone.

Any news of your own? Chime in in the comment section below.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 17, 2010, at 11:53 PM, fredgei wrote:

    If America recovers the way it always has (so far), then this is an excellent time to be buying stocks. In a decade (or maybe two, if Lehman's collapse is directly comparable to Black Tuesday of '29), every investment that isn't in a company that doesn't go bankrupt is guaranteed to be a profit.

    On the other hand, if we turned Japanese in 2008, and deflation takes hold, then we'll be facing a Dow that loses half its value by 2018-2020, and another half by 2028-2030. You pays your monies and you takes your chances.

    As for myself, I'm buying as much stock as I can reasonably afford, while also arguing (where I am listened to) that the Fed should be more worried about deflation than inflation. Unlike some, I've had the deflation worry since September 2008 (I honestly don't recall if it was the day of Lehman's demise, or a few days later). And subsequent events have only made the concern seem more immediate.

    Other investors may disagree. Invest according to your hunches, and may those who properly anticipate the market profit!

  • Report this Comment On September 18, 2010, at 12:05 PM, aleax wrote:

    @fredgei, "every investment that isn't in a company that doesn't go bankrupt" has a probably-unmeant double negative: investments that *aren't* in a company that *doesn't* go bankrupt, _are_ in a company that _does_ go bankrupt, and thus are lost;-). Nits apart, I like your thinking... and may I add that like every reader of the Economist I've been worried about deflation since day 1 of the crisis -- and the good news is that people working for treasuries and central banks _are_ such readers, and few other such institutions have such a tin ear as the BoJ: I think they'll do whatever it takes to fight deflation, even though it *does* likely mean some inflation spike down the road (and the political and economical pain of fighting the latter), even though populist politicians, like generals always busy fighting the last war, WILL scream about the horrors of inflation, the beauty of the gold standard, &c.

    Overall I'm mildly optimistic in the mid-run, expecting _real_ yearly returns from stocks (with dividend reinvestment and NOT much differentiation in bonds, gold, RE, &c, and WITH much differentiation in sectors, small vs large caps, global exposure, ...) around 5% for the next few years (gross of taxes). Maybe 6% for very sophisticated investors able to fully exploit strategies like selling covered calls on their stocks and season w/a little strategic shorting, but more like 5% for us hoi polloi doing mostly buy-hold-reinvest;-).

    In a sense I'd rather have that 5% real yearly return from 4% nominal plus 1% deflation rather than 8% nominal minus 3% inflation (far less taxes in the former scenario!-), but the former scenario is not sustainable, while the latter scenario is. (Taxes may also well have to go up... going back to taxing dividends as ordinary income might actually be destructive enough to dismantle my mild optimism, while the expected single-digit % raise in income and capital gains taxes is something I already factored in -- "go Roth, young man!" is applicable here, actually, but I'm not young enough for that to make sense for me, alas!-).

    Anyway, now I fully expect to be shot at from both the doom-mongers expecting double-digit negative real yearly returns AND the rosy-eyed ones expecting double-digit positive ones... that's usually how one knows one has hit a sensible centrist position, after all:-).

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1304694, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 1:02:32 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 3 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
JCP $28.08 Up +0.77 +2.82%
J.C. Penney Compan… CAPS Rating: *
LTD $46.41 Up +0.47 +1.02%
Limited Brands Inc… CAPS Rating: ***
WFC $31.86 Up +0.05 +0.16%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
ANF $36.23 Up +0.94 +2.66%
Abercrombie & Fitc… CAPS Rating: *
BAC $7.15 Up +0.01 +0.14%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
BP $38.36 Up +0.13 +0.34%
BP p.l.c. (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement