Recs

11

Head Straight for This Ship

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

In a wide bay on the Potomac River, about 30 miles south of Washington, D.C., the decomposing wrecks of a hundred or so ships sit as a sad monument to a past shipping boom. After the United States entered the First World War, there was a tremendous need for cargo capacity. But then demand ebbed.

Mallows Bay is a very visual example of the ultimate truth of the shipping industry. A few years of frenzied activity and shipbuilding will be inevitably followed by decades of rust and rot. The boom is always short, the bust is always painful, and long dull periods are the rule rather than the exception.

It might sound depressing, but this realization will help you ferret out what is arguably the best current name in the industry.

First, some history
Investors remember the perfect storm when the bottom dropped out for bulkers in 2008. Rates plummeted, bids for ships disappeared, orders were canceled and bulker stocks like DryShips (Nasdaq: DRYS  ) , Excel Maritime (NYSE: EXM  ) , and Genco Shipping (NYSE: GNK  ) each fell more than 90% from their highs.

Things looked bleak indeed, and some bulkers likely survived only due to their bankers' largess.

In the two years since the crash, fleet growth slowed as ships were scrapped and building contracts were canceled. Rates have improved, and the industry has again transitioned to the dull normal with less excitement and lower margins. Although demand has tailed, and the fleet is probably still too large, bulk shippers can still make money. Brazil has iron, China and India need it, and iron ore doesn't swim.

Unfortunately, the biggest problem with public bulkers like Eagle Bulk Shipping (Nasdaq: EGLE  ) , Navios Maritime (NYSE: NM  ) , and others isn't on the revenue side, but instead from balance sheets laden with debt from ships ordered in the boom years. In a persistent environment where the supply/demand picture will likely constrain margins, the interest on this debt will take a heavy bite of cash flow. That's assuming, of course, rates stay high enough to service the debt in the first place.

Check out the scary debt-to-equity ratios common to the industry:

Company

Debt/Equity

Baltic Trading (Nasdaq: BALT  )

3.46

Diana Shipping (NYSE: DSX  )

29.11

Excel Maritime

74.17

Dryships

102.91

Genco Shipping

140.12

Eagle Bulk Shipping

172.3

Navios Maritime

177.46

These ugly numbers don't tell the whole story
Although some companies have stronger balance sheets than others -- Diana Shipping, for one -- the overall leverage in the industry is sobering. An oversized debt load can crush cash flow, increase overall risk, and hinder opportunity, and that's just for starters.

Debt can undo a company in other ways as well, most notably in the small print of the debt covenants required to secure the credit lines. In fact, it was ship value, not lack of revenues, that was the greatest threat to the existence of some of these companies during the darkest days of 2008. As ship prices fell, the fair market values of the fleets fell below thresholds required by debt covenants. Lenders could have demanded ship sales or additional capital contributions. Some of the listed bulkers could have disappeared overnight.

To understand the full risks of each bulker, you have to drill down into the particulars of its credit lines. The best way to eliminate the risks of debt covenants is to not have much exposure in the first place.

But why buy liabilities if you don't have to?
Baltic Trading is the best option from a balance sheet standpoint. It purchased its fleet primarily with cash from the IPO rather than debt financing. And although a recent acquisition has put some debt on the balance sheet, leverage ratios are far lower than existing bulkers. Less debt not only reduces risk, but also reduces interest costs. These improved margins essentially make Baltic the low-cost producer, and could allow Baltic to remain more profitable than other bulkers.

If history is any guide, we are a year or so into what is likely one of the long dull epochs that comprise the majority of the dry bulk cycle. How long it will last is unknown, but if there is money to be made in the meantime, it will come from good management, low debt loads, and completive advantages.

Good times in shipping make for bad decisions, but you don't have to buy the companies that bear the scars. Don't pay extra for management's mistakes, or your investments could wind up as tragically as the wrecks in Mallows bay.

More on dry bulk shippers:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Josh Wilburn follows dry bulkers way too closely, and owns shares of Baltic Trading and Eagle Bulk. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 02, 2010, at 11:10 AM, shippingscam wrote:

    This article is a lot better from previous ones about this sector because these authors demonstrate that they have some knowledge of shipping. That being said, beware that there can be hidden debts in this area that investors cannot even imaging, including secret agreements with charter counterparties, putting stock as collateral and others. If you look at the data, NM with a D/E ratio of about 1.77 is operated like a hedge fund. This is about how much leverage hedge funds assume before they go bust or lose a good percentage of equity. Furthermore, NM should be investigate for its sale of a ship to NMP for an extraorbitantly large amount for this market. As a matter of fact, SEC officials should be held accountable for letting these companies get listed because this is an area that the average investor will never be able to know the details. IMO whoever invested in these companies upon IPO and is holding will never see their money back and probably lose it all.

  • Report this Comment On October 03, 2010, at 4:10 PM, brewer12345 wrote:

    This article from an author who claims to follow the shipping industry is laughable, and likely shaded by the author's position in BALT. First, most analysts who actually look at fundamentals view balance sheet leverage net of cash (debt minus cash). This would greatly alter the largely meaningless debt ratios cited by the author (I believe DSX would have negative net debt, for example). Second, the article ignores the charters each company has on its fleet. On that basis, BALT would actually be among the riskiest in the group since all of its charters are on a spot basis (floating rate time charters). Third, there is no attention given to a company's orderbook and how much of that orderbook is funded with debt or equity. If you have a bunch of newbuilds coming and cannot pay for them, you are oin for a world of hurt (this appears to be EGLE's problem).

    Instead of a silly throw away article focusing on a single (largely meaningless in isolation) metric, how about an effort to value these stocks? Perhaps a calculation of the fleet net of debt based on current market values (NAV)? Paying attention to the trustworthiness of management teams (or lack thereof) would actually be helpful for investors rather than this kind of "driveby" broadside.

    Disclosure: I own equity and bonds issued by NM, ULTR equity, NNA equity and NMM calls.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1319524, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 1:17:47 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 4 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:02 PM
EXM $0.89 Down -0.02 -2.21%
Excel Maritime Car… CAPS Rating: ****
GNK $3.22 Up +0.25 +8.42%
Genco Shipping & T… CAPS Rating: ***
NM $3.48 Up +0.14 +4.19%
Navios Maritime Ho… CAPS Rating: *****
DRYS $2.29 Up +0.04 +1.78%
DryShips, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
DSX $8.25 Up +0.27 +3.38%
Diana Shipping, In… CAPS Rating: *****
EGLE $3.69 Up +0.17 +4.83%
Eagle Bulk Shippin… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement