Recs

6

The Secret to Ford's Green Success

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

The trend is clear: Hybrids and electric vehicles are the future of the automobile.

Or are they?

There's certainly been lots of activity on that front recently: Nissan's new Leaf, General Motors' (NYSE: GM  ) vigorously touted Chevy Volt, Ford's (NYSE: F  ) upcoming Focus Electric, Tesla Motors' (Nasdaq: TSLA  ) IPO and partnership with Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) , and fresh news on upcoming electrics and advanced hybrids from Hyundai and Honda (NYSE: HMC  ) and, well, nearly everyone else. You get the idea. This is a big deal, and billions are being invested to make it happen.

There's just one problem. Consumer interest in hybrids and electrics may be declining.

The secret to Ford's (and GM's) green success
A Bloomberg report on Tuesday got right to the point: Nearly a quarter of the hybrids sold by Ford and GM since President Barack Obama took office were sold to -- wait for it -- the U.S. government.

Surprised? Some of that was part of the economic stimulus package, but the majority was funded, as Bloomberg put it, by "selling older cars in the government fleet," or as part of the General Services Administration's ordinary course of business.

That's not a knock on Ford or GM, of course. The Obama administration, like governments around the world, obviously wants to support and encourage the adoption of green vehicles. They aren't alone: General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) , for different but presumably equally obvious reasons, recently announced its own investment in an electrified automotive future. GE has pledged to buy 25,000 electric vehicles for its own fleet over the next five years, starting with 12,000 Chevy Volts.

There's more: Electricity wholesaler NRG Energy (NYSE: NRG  ) is ponying up $10 million to build vehicle charging stations in Texas, in partnership with several retail chains, and a long list of local governments and corporations are pondering similar moves.

It's clear why all of these institutions want to see lots of electric cars on the road. But does anyone else?

A chicken-and-egg problem
As Fool April Taylor put it recently, electrics and hybrids represent something of a chicken-and-egg problem. Electric cars and hybrids are more expensive than their conventionally powered counterparts, and at least in the case of electrics, they're very much a limited, unproven technology. Nissan's Leaf has a maximum range of around 100 miles -- and that's if traffic, weather, and the driver's right foot all cooperate in just the right way.

What's more, the infrastructure we take for granted with gas-powered cars just hasn't arrived yet, which limits their flexibility in real-world use. You might be able to drive your electric over the river and through the woods to grandma's house -- but I hope you're up for a long visit, because it could take eight hours or more to recharge your car using the outlet in her garage.

Hybrids don't have the range limitation of all-electric cars, but they share the cost and weight problems to some extent. You're essentially paying for a car with two entire drivetrains. But as the mileage of conventionally powered cars improves -- Ford's upcoming Focus, a car roughly the size of a Prius but several thousand dollars cheaper, is expected to have an EPA highway rating around 40 miles per gallon -- the cost, weight, and potential long-term maintenance headaches of a hybrid get harder to justify.

The assumption, probably valid, is that costs (and weight) will come down, range will go up, and recharging infrastructure will get built as sales of these vehicles increase. But consumer sales of hybrids are set to decline for the third straight year, despite gas prices that would have seemed shocking just a few years ago.

Long story short, there are lots of new models coming to market just as buyers seem to be turning away. Is this a debacle in the making?

I hope you're not in a hurry
Industry-watcher J.D. Power expects that just less than a million hybrids and electrics will be sold around the world this year. That's a mere 2.2% of the nearly 45 million passenger vehicle sales expected, and while J.D. Power expects that percentage to rise, they project it'll still be only 7.3% of the total in 2020.

What could accelerate that? More aggressive government policies in major markets like the U.S. or China might help, but such policies (at least here) seem likely to be unpopular -- unless there's a major oil crisis.

That's the fear that has driven much of the industry's recent expansion, of course. Another oil shock seems inevitable, but how the timing of such a shock will play out with the huge investments being made in electric-car technology today remains to be seen. And as Ford CEO Alan Mulally said recently, this technology only makes sense as a long-term proposition if it can stand on its own without government intervention. Ford's somewhat tentative approach to automotive electrification reflects that view, which seems like a prudent one.

What do you think? Are electric cars arriving in the nick of time? Or is this an expensive fad that's likely to fade? Scroll down to leave a comment and let me know.

Want to read more about Ford? Add it to My Watchlist, which will find all of our Foolish analysis on the Dearborn dynamo.

Fool contributor John Rosevear owns shares of Ford, which is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. You can try Stock Advisor or any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 23, 2010, at 5:59 PM, ThorsteinVeblen wrote:

    "...the cost, weight, and potential long-term maintenance headaches of a hybrid get harder to justify"

    All I can tell you is that we have over 100,000 miles on our 2004 Prius and still routinely get 48-50 mpg. The only servicing beyond an oil change every 10K miles (with synthetic oil) is 2 sets of tires, one standard 12v battery and a few tail bulbs. Everything else, brakes, rotors, pads, gas motor, spark plugs, electric motor, main propulsion battery, shocks, bearings, etc are all original equipment. Done right, the electric propulsion and braking regeneration extend the life of the gas engine portion REDUCING the maintenance load.

  • Report this Comment On November 23, 2010, at 7:23 PM, RobVann wrote:

    AND maintenance issues on an ALL electric is even less as there are only three moving parts to the motor.

    Electric vehicles unfortunately are treated by the media as a curiosity. Hopefully the introduction of the leaf and volt will stir some serious interest here in north america. There are a dozen or so car manufacturers ready to launch electrics in developing countries which have more lenient body impact/safety requirements. Tata is apparently making an electric NANO model available at much lower prices. It may well be that the real growth in the electric vehicle industry will be in India or China.

    The "Holy Grail" at the moment is finding a economical lightweight battery that will give a two hundred mile plus range. Something I'm watching is

    http://www.freewebs.com/eestorfaq/

    Although the stock (ZENN on the TSE) was up 50% a few days count me out. The Eestor story is worth more than the stock price!

  • Report this Comment On November 23, 2010, at 7:57 PM, TMFMarlowe wrote:

    @ThorsteinVeblen: Having a neighbor who spent $5000+ replacing the battery pack (among other things) on her first-gen Prius, together with mildly scary anecdotes from other owners, made me a bit skeptical of their longevity generally. I understand that many people have had (so far) long and happy relationships with the second-gen cars, but I remain skeptical (of cars with batteries generally, not just the Prius).

    @RobVann: We aren't treating them as a novelty here at the Fool. I've been writing an awful lot about electric vehicles in recent months, and I'm not the only one.

    Thanks for reading.

    John Rosevear

  • Report this Comment On November 23, 2010, at 8:10 PM, frankwindes wrote:

    I have wanted an electric car for some time, remembering the electrics when I was a kid. Quiet, smooth and green. Since I have installed solar panels that produce more kwh than I need for my home, when I find an electric or plug in hybrid that I like I plan to purchase it, thereby getting better return on my solar investment. But my interest stems from enduring the 1974 gas crunch and seeing the obvious growing demand for energy in China and India, which is bound to drive our energy costs up permanently and real fast in the not too distant future. If the administration were to lay out a real energy strategy for the next 30 years it would be clearer to both manufacturers and customers that the supply of petroleum based energy at reasonable prices is going to dwindle fast, and electric cars will be a good investment.

  • Report this Comment On November 23, 2010, at 11:31 PM, priusqueen wrote:

    I know a cabbie in Vancouver who, with his partner, drove over 400,000 kilometers with nary a problem. The vehicle was seldom even turned off. Toyota switched their first generation Prius for a second, and the "new" one is still operating splendidly.

    The Prius is the cheapest vehicle to operate; not needing tuneups, points, plugs, etc. saves a bunch a money. Resale is very high as well, making it possible to, as our family did, buy one, drive it 40,000 miles, and sell it for $2,000 less than we paid. The $2,000 was offset by a tax credit, so we drove 40,000 miles at 48-52 mpg (closer to 40 mpg in extreme--sub-zero--cold) for the cost of about 800 gallons of gas and 3-4 oil changes.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2010, at 5:11 AM, rmarks1 wrote:

    Not two different drive trains. The real trick to hybrids is making a mechanically integrated gas / electric machine. I saw a mock-up of the new Focus engine at an auto show. The electric motor bolted right onto the gas engine as an integrated whole.

    Also for bigger machinery, like pickup trucks, some company (Borg Warner?) makes a cute little bolt in electric motor / regenerative braking box. It won't power the vehicle, but it sure stores the power when you brake.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2010, at 7:32 AM, Kiffit wrote:

    I am sure that this article is onto something. It is a realistic reminder that mass consumer societies have not even begun to think seriously about just how serious their environmental problems are becoming.

    Even if they killed every non Peoples' Republic of China citizen on the planet, if the people of that country adopted the American lifestyle in detail, the rate of carbon build up in the atmosphere would still go up dramatically from present levels.

    The American lifestyle in general and its automobile use in particular, is not a replicable model of economic development, at least for very long.

    Failure to confront this will cost us a multi millenial catastrophe that will reduce human populations to a shadow of what they now are.

    The article above, like the automobile markets it is analying, hasn't even begun to digest this appalling possiblity.

    In 1917, as Czarist Russia started to implode, the main controversy within the Russian Orthodox churcn of the time was over priestly vestments.

    When the fawn finds itself cornered by a tiger, it preens itself in the vain hope its predator will just disappear.

    Clearly, only the actual claw of the tiger or the closing of churches will activate the instinct to run. But then of course, it is too late.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Dartster69 wrote:

    I like the idea of an all electric or hybrid vehicle and I hope as the technology improves, the idea will grow significantly in the commercial vehicle sector. Heavy trucks do offer hybrid systems and I hope this technology finds a permanent home in city delivery trucks (i.e. Garbage trucks especially). the added weight of the batteries will have to be offset by removing weight elsewhere on the trucks (i.e. the on-board apartment).

    the down-side to this new technology is indeed the cost of the system; the $10K upcharge will buy alot of fue for the non-hybrid version over its lifetime.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2010, at 4:05 PM, donbcms wrote:

    Think about it! ! The whole electric or hybrid vehicle idea is definitely is not a fad! ! It is a "necessity"! !

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2010, at 5:24 PM, biddy11 wrote:

    Why can't they make some of the hybrid bodies look more manly and tough! Then these hybrids will take off!

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2010, at 5:30 PM, DDHv wrote:

    Batteries are the primary question. Micro hybrids (stop engine when stopped, start again when starting) will pay but need a long life battery. AXPW.OB or XIDE are ways to play this.

    Prius level hybrids work out now, as an average.

    Plug-ins or BEV vehicles can work out if there are many short stops, as with in-city delivery or collection vehicles. And as one comment above pointed out, they can improve ROI on a PV solar system if it is more than the building needs. PS, a PVThermal system, by harvesting the heat also, can also improve ROI. The extra heat can be dumped into the soil under and around the house - with good design this will cut heating costs.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2010, at 4:02 AM, TomHoffa wrote:

    a all electric vehicle is a non viable solution.

    1.) the EV was just another example of the rip off of tax payers money by general motors and liberals.

    2.)a all electric vehicle isn't a viable or feasable solution to anything but a over priced toy to run about in a small city.

    (what middle class person in their right mind would even think about paying fifty thousand dollers for something that couldnt even get them out of town to see their grandpaw much less to some place to wait 7 hours to wait their turn to charge for over a hour)

    3.)a affordable hybrid is the only appropriate solution of range, affordabilty, so called liberal word "GREEN"...ect. as the toyota prius has somewhat proven to be. to be economical the toyota prius has to at least make 65-75 miles with out a charge and 75-100 garanteed miles per gallon.

    the deisel is the only efficient motor to achieve this. and the use of AC electric motors. its simple the COST! just doesnt justify or even to begin saving anything(long story of facts).

    4.)the so called misleading calculations of this kilowatt per hour comparisons to miles per gallon has mystified not only woodstock era liberals but polar bears included.

    it costs the most to heat your home on electricity than any other means. and by the time IF you saved one shiney penny you would never pay for the gas that you supposedly saved let alone have this liberal dream pay for itself.

    5.)can you imagine all the natural resourses it would take to make the astronomical supply of electricty just to charge for just one day all the vehicles if all vehicles were full electric??????????

    not to mention the pollution that would incur??

    its clear that the only viable, safest, cheapest,and cleanest conclusion would be to build not only more, but nuclear power plants!!

    even obama himself claimed that we need more nuclear power plants!!

    oh i can hear the liberal story of the wonderful wind mill power, good god put them all in your back yard, these things certainly are worthless scenery land grabing unfriendly envirement robbing bird killing monsters that contaminate so your hair turns green and falls out with the whole pcb mess. any wind really knocks the towers over with drastic results. would you like to see these in our national monuments and forests like on mt rushmore? sure you want power but dont make it in your back yard!!??

    also. yer little cell phones have caused more radiation poisoning and brain cancer than all the nuclear power plants put together ever will.

    liberals think they can fly like peter pan i suppose???

    invest in worthless money losing solar, wind, and electric vehicles??? NEVER!!

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2010, at 4:31 AM, TomHoffa wrote:

    oh yes, i forgot to ask.

    were are we supposed to throw out all these wonderful batteries? do we just simply toss them into the hudson river much like general electric did with pcb's?? oh how nice GE is entering the electric car market!

    oh i know we recycle them!! (and the cost of recycling is 10 times more than making from new material).

    i can only imagine in northern new york (much less the dakotas) in the middle of winter were summers are measured in minutes. it snows 8 feet a day and temperatures reaching 40 degrees below zero how it would be to get to work!? lets see, assuming the roads are plowed you hop in your all new $50,000.00 hot rod all electric vehicle fully charged( also asuming the power didnt go out from the storms so that you could charge)by the time you warmed up the vehicle to fully defrost all the windows (involves also running airconditioning to remove the fog on windows)and warmed up with its heat to be able to even enter the vehicle. all its running lights on windshield wipers, electric power stering...ect.... how far would somebody get in negative 20 degrees below zero???? NOT very far! they may find the dead person when the snow melts in mid june!?

    does a all electric vehicle sound the best economic thing to do????

    i suppose we can fly with a mary poppins umbrella??

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2010, at 5:14 AM, syrasen wrote:

    Way before it enters the market; GM’s plug-in hybrid the Chevrolet Volt, having a backup gasoline engine already has taken a lot of beating from media. We’ve driven the pre-production Chevrolet Volt, and although our experience wasn’t sufficient for a full-size road test, the Chevrolet Volt came out as a much better vehicle than what we were expecting, and an irrefutable engineering coup for GM.

    http://www.greenautozone.net/2011-chevrolet-volt.html

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1378857, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 3:06:03 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 5 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
NRG $15.64 Down -0.05 -0.32%
NRG Energy, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
TM $76.80 Down -0.40 -0.52%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ****
TSLA $29.81 Down -0.51 -1.68%
Tesla Motors CAPS Rating: *
HMC $31.92 Down -0.28 -0.87%
Honda Motor Co., L… CAPS Rating: ****
F $10.60 Up +0.01 +0.09%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GE $19.20 Down -0.05 -0.26%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
GM $22.44 Up +0.40 +1.81%
General Motors Com… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement