Rising Star Buy: Bridgepoint Education

This article is part of our Rising StarsPortfolios series.

The market's been singing some Pink Floyd lately -- specifically, "We don't need no education!" It's music to my ears.

Everyone and their alma mater hates for-profit universities. An index of the sector is down 46% from its April highs, as investors seem to be bracing for sweeping reforms and draconian regulations, whether from Congress or the Department of Education.

At the same time, think about these numbers:

  • Unemployment among bachelor's-degree holders: 5.1%
  • Unemployment among high-school graduates: 10%
  • Unemployment among those without high school diplomas: 15.7%

Roughly 67% of the U.S. population above the age of 25 -- 88 million people! -- lacks a college education. President Obama has set the ambitious goal for the United States to reclaim its status as first in the world in college attainment; we currently rank 12th, and estimates find us 13 million-16 million graduates short. To meet our goals, we're gonna need a bigger classroom.

Given such opportunities, I'd rather be opening up the Louis-Charles University. (It has a nice ring to it, eh?) However, I estimate that my Rising Star kitty of $17,000 leaves me a bit short of getting my name emblazoned on a college library anytime soon. So for now, I'll settle for a 7% position (roughly $1,200) in a relatively young upstart, Bridgepoint Education (NYSE: BPI  ) , owners of Ashford University and the University of the Rockies.

Why this one? Bridgepoint is an extremely profitable operation run by seasoned industry veterans, offering investors a ton of GULP -- growth at an unreasonably low price. But even though Bridgepoint offers one of the most attractive reward-to-risk investments in the space, it was still difficult to pick only one winner. So don't be surprised, especially if the sector stays beaten-up, to find me adding a few more educational names to my eponymously named ALOHA portfolio.

Say ALOHA to our little for-profit friend
Since I hear mnemonics are popular with studious college kids these days, I thought it apropos to roll out my ALOHA checklist on this pick. ALOHA is an acronym I use to remind me of the five key questions I ask of all my investments. Let's put Bridgepoint to the test:

Asymmetric: Are we being appropriately compensated for the risk we are taking?
Bridgepoint currently trades for 2.74 EV/EBITDA; it has no debt and 28% of its value in cash; and it's still growing by leaps and bounds. I've estimated an intrinsic value range for Bridgepoint of $45-$60 per share. Even if the company suddenly stopped growing, I still estimate the value of the shares at $24. To reach Bridgepoint's recent 52 week lows, you have to believe that its free cash flow will be roughly cut in half. Even using this dire scenario as my low estimate, and $45 as my high estimate, I arrive at a reward-to-risk ratio of 10-to-1.

Leveraged: Is there a natural edge or strategic advantage embedded in this investment?
In five years, Bridgepoint has grown from approximately 322 students to 77,179, while expanding gross margins from 31% to 74%. The online education model is highly scalable, and upon reaching critical mass, it's ridiculously profitable. Add in Bridgepoint's strategy to accept high levels of transfer credits (it's the only private-sector institution to accept up to 99 approved credits), partner with community colleges, and pursue growth though military and corporate channels, and you have a company with seemingly limitless potential.

Opportunity: What's the opportunity, why does it exist, and can we capitalize on it?
While a rising tide in for-profit education industry has lifted all boats for the better part of a decade, it also meant that both yachts and dinghies profited alike. Now that the tide is coming in, we're about to see which universities are truly seaworthy. I believe that Bridgepoint isn't simply fit to sail -- I think it's a speedboat with miles of calm ocean ahead.

Bridgepoint's repayment rates and graduation rates not only appear to comply with potential Department of Education requirements, but also consistently rank at or above those of more established for-profit universities. Additionally, with Warburg Pincus -- a very successful private equity firm -- as its largest shareholder, I see Bridgepoint potentially picking up some attractive pieces if and when its competitors implode.

Has a catatlyst: What crucial tipping point will affect this stock, and how soon?
The biggest catalyst for Bridgepoint is regulatory clarity. The Department of Education is expected to publish its final regulations early in 2011. The new regulations were originally expected to be published in early November, but the department is taking more time to "consider comments [they] received". The for-profit lobby is out in full force, and I expect that the initially proposed regulations will be somewhat tempered.

While the effects of these regulations will not kick in for six-12 months, the smarter institutions have already begun to adjust their operations. I believe it will be clear how the new regulations affect Bridgepoint's growth potential within three to four quarters.

Allocation: How big a position does this investment warrant?
Besides the cash and two campuses, Bridgepoint's value lies in its brand and earning power. Regulations could hurt its ability to grow enrollment, and headline risk jeopardizes the entire segment's reputation. However, if Bridgepoint is able to absorb the regulatory changes, and the media's appetite for this storyline fades, I expect this investment to be a two-to-three-year multibagger.

The Foolish bottom line
Rarely, if ever, will you find a debt-free company with 30% operating margins, growing revenue at 50%, which sells for less than eight times trailing earnings. Bridgepoint Education is one of those rare opportunities and I look forward to its matriculation in my Rising Stars real-money portfolio.

You can follow Inside Value and Special Ops analyst Andy Louis-Charles on Twitter @TMFAloha, or converse with him on his Rising Stars message board here. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (20)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 08, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Education101 wrote:

    Ah, Andy. But there are other pesky problems with the online education sector:

    1) Public institutions are offering online degrees at record speed and these institutions a) have great respected brand names + low cost compared to the for profit sector. Ouch! Perceived value/quality + Low cost: that's a hard combo to trump.

    Much of the great growth we've seen in for profit ed stocks has been a result of first mover advantage (hey, there was no choice but the large for profits mostly in the last decade).

    But now we have reached the age of choice. 12,000 online degrees: that's a lot of choice, and the for profits cannot compete on either price or quality. It's a new era out there even if we assume calm ripples for regulatory change in 2011.

  • Report this Comment On December 08, 2010, at 1:23 PM, project8 wrote:

    first I wanted to say the begining of the second paragraph with bridgwater instead of Bridgepoint.

    Now where else, I think that anyone that wants to buy this stock should take a class there and see the quality of the classes they are investing in. They are not good, I took classes at Ashford and was in classes with people that had already been taking classes there for 12, 18, even 24 months or longer.

    It is a writing intensive program with no testing for finals. That being said some of the people that were in these classes were writing on an elementary level. They are simply being passed along so the company can get as much money from the DOE as posibly. Luckily I am a veteran so I didn't have to pay for classes with loans but it was still money I couldn't get back.

    The "instructors" are really more like forum monitors, they have no control over the classroom or assignments, these are all laid out by Bridgepoint, and do no instrucition at all. The only contact I had with mine were templated emails that were sent out automatically.

    If you dont want to do work but get a degree it is the place to go. In one class my assignments were supposed to be 200-300 words out of 30 people in the class only 5 people even attempted to get close to that word count. Most were 50-75 words in length and again written terribly.

    It is true that the founders came from University of Phoenix so they have experience, I guess knowing the industry is why most of them started selling of their stock back in july and August. Andrew Clarke who started BPI and is the CEO has sold almost all of his fonders shares and is no longer listed as a share owner. I have seen that he actually owns less than 1,000 shares of BPI now. Other Execs have been selling to, Senior VP Chris Spohn, Rodney(Rocky) Sheng, Jane Mcauliffe have all sold large amounts of their founders stocks since the end of July.

    This could be a coincedence but a lot of other for profit schools founders have been selling of their shares as well and the SEC is investigating them for insider trading because all of this activity coincides with the new DOE regulations.

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2011, at 6:52 PM, easyavenue wrote:

    Andy,

    I am disappointed in your write-up. After reading it I was prepared to find out more and possibly invest. But after reading the comments I almost feel as though your article was misleading.

    Part of being a successful investor, let alone being a professional Analyst, IMHO, is to anticipate arguments pro and con. Only then can you give a fair and objective assessment. "He who knows only his own side of a case, knows little of that." I forget who said that. But it is so true.

    Would you please review your industry analysis and reply to the first commentator? I'd like to hear what you have to say.

    Thank you.

    EA

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1391889, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/21/2014 10:32:21 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 17,804.80 26.65 0.15%
S&P 500 2,070.65 9.42 0.46%
NASD 4,765.38 16.98 0.36%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/19/2014 4:01 PM
BPI $11.84 Up +0.30 +2.60%
Bridgepoint Educat… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement