Recs

7

3 Warning Signs for Dividend Investors

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Fantastic dividends are often exactly that: too good to be true.

I learned that lesson the hard way four years ago. My retirement portfolio included a few shares or mortgage REIT NovaStar Financial because the stock paid a jaw-dropping 17% dividend yield. To my untrained dividend-hunting eye, NovaStar's payouts looked solid enough as the company had been raising its common dividends year by year while also keeping its cash balances fairly stable. It was a guaranteed goldmine until my retiring days -- or so I thought.

Mirage, illusion, phantasm
But the giant dividend was standing on feet of clay. The juicy payout came from subprime mortgage sales, and by the summer of 2006, it was becoming obvious even to my inexpert self that NovaStar's good times were coming to an end. Too much debt tied up in repackaged mortgage bonds, not enough cash flow to keep the gravy train rolling, and the company was actually paying dividends out of the proceeds from printing fresh shares. Ouch.

Not long after that, NovaStar canceled its dividends and became an instant penny stock. I got lucky and backed out before the eternal rivers of dividend gold dried up. If not, I'd be left holding a worthless bag of reinvested dividends. The same thing could happen to any dividend darling today that can't back its fantastic payments up with a solid business.

Who's next?
The warning signs around NovaStar were plentiful:

  • High dividend payments but low or negative cash flows. The money came from sources other than running the business.
  • Massive short interest (particularly telling because of the high yields -- short-sellers lose money on those payouts).
  • The company was under a heavy barrage of shareholder lawsuits, fraud claims, and executive changes. That much pressure on the corporate structure doesn't bode well for the future.

With these red flags in mind, let's take a look at some of the most generous divided stocks in 2010. If any of them remind us of NovaStar, it might be time to take your dividends are run elsewhere.

Company TTM Dividend Yield (%) Cash Payout Ratio (%) Short Interest (%) CAPS Rating (out of 5)
National Beverage Company (Nasdaq: FIZZ  )

15.1%

119.8%

5.1%

**
Partner Communications (Nasdaq: PTNR  )

10.5%

62.8%

0.4%

****
Teekay Tankers (NYSE: TNK  )

10.1%

80.7%

3.4%

****
Encore Energy Partners (NYSE: ENP  )

9.4%

86%

0.5%

****
Consolidated Communications Holdings (Nasdaq: CNSL  )

8.4%

40.5%

2.8%

**

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. TTM = trailing twelve months. "Cash payout" = TTM dividends divided by TTM cash flows from operations.

Whys and wherefores
Some of these stocks pass the common-sense filters handed down by NovaStar and its ilk:

  • Consolidated Communications is about as squeaky-clean a business as you'll find among high-dividend payers. The company buys back more stock than it sells, easily covers dividend costs out of free cash flows, and hasn't taken on new debt since 2007 -- and even then, Consolidated was financing a $347 million buyout of a regional telecom. No signs of a new NovaStar here.
  • Partner Communications buys back a lot of stock, which is good. However, the Israeli telecom raised fresh debt in recent years faster than it could pay the old loans back, and doesn't have the excuse of large acquisitions for that ugly habit. For now, cash flows look strong enough to support the dividend, and the borrowing habit hasn't caused terrible damage. Our Income Investor team doesn't seem too worried about Partner's debt, but it's a bit of a red flag from my NovaStar experience.

Others don't necessarily pass the sniff test:

  • At first blush, National Beverage's dividend looks way too big. The reason for this is that the company doesn't pay a steady, annual or quarterly dividend like a true dividend dynamo would. Instead, it pays out a tremendous special dividend once in a blue moon accompanied by really colorful press releases. This is probably not the stock you want as a true-blue income investor -- though the company doesn't look ready to implode, either.
  • Teekay Tankers is a different animal altogether. It's an oil tanker operator like Frontline (NYSE: FRO  ) , only dead-set on returning cash to shareholders rather than investing in business growth. I'm not convinced that the cash machine here is strong enough to support these payouts, and heavily dilutive stock sales seem to support my misgivings.
  • Then there's oil and gas exploration company Encore Energy, whose large dividends made its first appearance in 2008 -- which is also when the company's debt load started to creep up. Also, the company often has large capital expenses that sap the cash-making prowess of its operations, making the generous dividend unrealistic in the long run.

Take action, Fool!
None of the finds above are official recommendations, but should form a healthy base for further research. If you're still left searching for a dependable income stock after considering these factors, you may want to turn to less-flashy but time-tested payout performers. Obvious examples include longtime Income Investor recommendation and liquor legend Diageo (NYSE: DEO  ) .

And if you do smell signs of another NovaStar in your own portfolio, you have to make sure the comparisons are only superficial. Disappearing dividends are worse than not having one to begin with.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Anders Bylund holds no position in any of the companies discussed here. Diageo and Partner Communications are Motley Fool Income Investor recommendations. The Fool owns shares of Diageo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. You can check out Anders' holdings and a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2010, at 10:50 PM, zorro6204 wrote:

    You don't know what you're talking about. ENP is not an exploration company, it's an oil-heavy upstream MLP, which acquires existing reserves for production. Its model, like all MLP's, is to maximize cash payments to unit holders.

    You make it sound like it's burdened with debt. In fact, ENP has one of the lowest ratios of debt to distributable cash flow in the midcap space, it's half as leveraged to cash flow as industry leader LINE.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2010, at 5:52 AM, TMFZahrim wrote:

    @zorro, thanks for the clarification. Still, the company used to be entirely debt-free until it bought the Big Horn rights, which is where both dividend payments and debt balance started racking up. And ENP does have large CapEx spending going on, which doesn't leave enough free cash flow to cover the dividend payout. The company is dipping into cash balance to do it at all, which in turn is partly supported by new loans. I don't like it that way at all.

    Anders

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2010, at 11:06 AM, zorro6204 wrote:

    ENP has been covering its distribution with cash flow, not debt, and it's done so throughout the financial crisis, as with most of its peers who used hedging. In the most recent quarter distributable cash flow was $24.7 million vs. distributions of $22.9 million.

    Through Q3 of 2010, the MLP reduced debt by $15 million, and capital expenditures were extremely low, $4.3 million, compared with $39.3 million in 2009, reflecting inattention by Denbury, who was not interested in operating an MLP. And, as I said, ENP is one of the least leveraged MLP's in the space, in Q3 the ratio of debt to annualized DCF was only 2.52, compared to the midcap average of 4.66 (LINE was at 4.89).

    All MlP's use leverage, even PSE. You picked the wrong company to make your point, just about any other MLP would have been a better candidate. But the midcap MLP's are not paying excessive distributions, in fact just about the whole space is quite strongly capitalized, after raising equity in the wake of the crash. You're fishing in the wrong pool.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2010, at 1:39 PM, jdb52 wrote:

    You must be unfamiliar with Master Limited Partnerships and their accounting.

    The relevant cash flow metric, as mentioned, is distributable cash flow, not net income. You have to add back in depreciation, depletion, etc., from the expense accounting and then, understand that derivativies, like hedges, fluctuate each quarter but operationally keep cash flow stable.

    Rational debt is not a bad thing. Their debt is low and is no problem at all.

    The decline rates on their oil properties are some of the lowest in the sector and do not require significant cap ex to replace.

    Bottom line is you have this one all wrong.

    You can always tell a neophyte to the sector when you use the word dividend to describe payouts. They are distributions to limited partners.

  • Report this Comment On December 15, 2010, at 7:33 PM, klaimr2006 wrote:

    How does MF let people with "no knowledge" on a subject write these articles. The author either knows absolutely nothing about mlps, in this case enp, and how they are structured, funded and function or the author is purposely mis leading the readers. Which ever case is valid MF needs to remove the author from their publishing list. Maybe filing a complaint with MF on the authors lack of knowledge or lack on integrity is the way to get this misinformation corrected in this article.

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Venerability wrote:

    I wish I had noticed this story before, in case it has skewed anyone's perception of TNK.

    Above commentary is way off-base!

    TNK is one of several companies in the Teekay Group.

    It is designed to be the Group's effectual "banker" stock.

    Even if the Group as a whole loses money, TNK is designed to make money and pay out very nice dividends.

    The dividends vary a bit from quarter to quarter based more on financing considerations for new ships or ship refurbishings than on changes in Group earnings.

    But they will stay high.

    The stock is not really meant to attract retail investors. Its constituents are insitutions, including many conservative ones. In fact, it has been a favorite among some energy-related MLPs, like those from Kayne Anderson.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1400247, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 4:06:27 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:02 PM
FRO $5.38 Up +0.40 +8.03%
Frontline Ltd. (US… CAPS Rating: ***
PTNR $4.46 Up +0.10 +2.29%
Partner Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
TNK $4.23 Up +0.02 +0.48%
Teekay Tankers CAPS Rating: ***
FIZZ $14.01 Down -0.09 -0.64%
National Beverage… CAPS Rating: ***
CNSL $14.14 Up +0.19 +1.36%
Consolidated Commu… CAPS Rating: ***
DEO $94.61 Up +0.54 +0.57%
Diageo plc (ADR) CAPS Rating: *****
ENP $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Encore Energy Part… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement