Recs

20

Our Top 3 Entertainment Stocks for 2011

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

The world of entertainment is exciting and constantly changing. Whether its television, movies, satellite radio, advertising, or publishing, these industries are all extremely vulnerable because of persistent innovation and technology. One day a certain stock might be all the rage. The next day it could be poised to plunge. And that's why we've asked three of our top Fool contributors to shed some light on 2011 and provide us with their top picks in the entertainment industry for next year. Be sure to check them out!

Rick Aristotle Munarriz, Fool contributor
My favorite entertainment stock is almost like a mutual fund trading at a steep discount. Liberty Capital (Nasdaq: LCAPA  ) consists largely of John Malone's eclectic portfolio of entertainment holdings. We're talking about the Atlanta Braves, a pair of CBS affiliate television stations, and a majority stake in MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. There are also small positions in entertainment giants Time Warner, Viacom, and Live Nation (NYSE: LYV  ) . It's also holding small chunks of Denver's Kroenke Arena and the Hallmark Channel's parent company.

Liberty Capital's most valuable holding is a 40% preferred share stake in Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) that is now worth roughly $3.5 billion. That's a sizable chunk of Liberty Capital's $5 billion market cap -- and nearly $7 billion in enterprise value.

Last month, Gabelli analyst Brett Harriss sized up Liberty Capital's public and private holdings. By his math, it's trading at a 40% discount to the value of its assets. Sure, there are a few dog investments in there, but the sum of Liberty Capital's parts is valuable enough to easily overlook the stinkers.

The key, of course, is Malone's ability to unlock the value of these positions without creating taxable dilemmas. Then again, it's hard to argue with his track record over the years. Of Liberty Media's three tracking stocks, this is the one that offers the perfect balance of growth and value in a single marked-down investment.

Anders Bylund, Fool contributor
What Hollywood needs now is quality content, not another whiz-bang technology. The good news is, DreamWorks Animation SKG (Nasdaq: DWA  ) knows how to deliver it.

How to Train Your Dragon is a case in point: The movie has made a staggering $493 million in worldwide box office business and also gets favorable reviews from 98% of professional critics, making it the second-most admired movie of 2010 among wide releases. No. 1? That was Walt Disney's (NYSE: DIS  ) epic Toy Story 3. If you've been avoiding DreamWorks Animation because animated movies are child's play, I think you need to reconsider. This stuff isn't just big business -- it's also a well-respected art these days.

Shrek may be done as a tentpole franchise for DreamWorks Animation, but there are plenty of candidates lining up to replace it. Dragon already has a sequel in the works as does 2008 hit Kung Fu Panda, not to mention a cadre of Shrek spin-offs and a third installment in the Madagascar series. On top of the monetizing efforts for existing franchises, the company is also busy developing new ideas such as a mixed live-action and animation movie about shadows controlling their humans.

Content is king, and DreamWorks knows how to develop and deliver it. The company operates on fatter margins than Disney or DreamWorks distribution partner Viacom, and I've shown you how healthy the content pipeline looks. Yet the stock is priced in line with Disney's, as if DreamWorks weren't a much more efficient business.

Kung Fu Panda 2 might start changing the has-been perception around a Shrek-less DreamWorks next year. You wouldn't want to miss that ride.

David Lee Smith, Fool contributor
I suppose it could be deemed coincidental that my assessment of the best and worst of the entertainment stocks both belong to the cable group. That, however, is the way the industry appears to have moved, especially given the likely takeover of General Electric's (NYSE: GE  ) NBC Universal by Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA  ) , the biggest -- and I believe the soundest -- of the cable operators.

With nearly 23 million video customers, Comcast has come a long way since 1963, when Ralph Roberts -- the father of current CEO Brian L. Roberts -- and two colleagues bought a tiny 1,200-subscriber cable system in Tupelo, Miss. As a cable and broadcasting analyst early in the past decade, I first watched the company lead the cable pack with quality service to about 8 million subscribers.

It's long been clear that Brian Roberts and his top-notch team have recognized more acutely than other managements that content is indeed king in the TV business. That recognition obviously led to an unsuccessful effort to acquire Disney in 2004 and to the current deal-in-the-works with NBC U, a combination that, should it be approved, likely will benefit from Comcast's management prowess.

Further, Comcast is also testing a new TV-Internet combo box in Augusta, Ga. If successful, the device could accelerate the advancement of the still-new world of Internet programming.

As such, with all it has in the works, it's difficult to imagine Comcast relinquishing its position as the big enchilada of pay TV.  

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributors above own no shares of the companies mentioned. Walt Disney is a Motley Fool Inside Value choice. Walt Disney and DreamWorks Animation SKG are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy that watches Motorcycle Diaries on a monthly basis.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 12:56 PM, pete163 wrote:

    No mater what SiriusXM is worth it will not be bought until it hit's 19 to 22 dollar value. Now here the part that makes me want to scream, and I'v seen this before! Look at PEP, Coke, UN, PG, these are staple of the marker and they move slow, up but slow. SiriusXM is now entering that area of the long term portfolio stage. It's like watching paint dry, it will go up but slow as the others did. SiriusXM has become a retirement stock like it or not that's what it is.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 2:57 PM, langco1 wrote:

    ita amazing that sirius has not gone bankrupt already. surely it will never see more than a few months of 2011......

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 5:26 PM, akbarcaskey678 wrote:

    SIRI is going to make people a fortune. If you bought it at a dollar and it goes to 20, that is a 20 bagger. invested today = agree with the 1st person who commented this article because even though I think SIRI will take maybe a decade to hit 20; maybe even 30+ thats a hell of a return regardless of how long I wait.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 7:37 PM, rett448 wrote:

    I worry about the long term health of cable stocks in general and Comcast especially. For the last 50 years the regulatory environment has been very favorable to cable companies. They sign franchise agreements and are guaranteed large regions where they are the sole provider of television service. Up until a few years ago if you wanted anything more than the broadcast channels you were forced to pay whatever cable company served your area.

    About 5 years ago things started to change. Cable providers are now battling a two front war to keep subscribers. On one side Verizon and ATT have entered the television market with superior service at competitive prices. Additionally satellite providers such as Directv and Dish have lowered prices while adding channels. Cable television service consistently ranks very low in customer satisfaction. Since most of them have a government mandated monopoly status there has been no push for them to improve customer service (http://www.jdpower.com/Telecom/ratings/television-service-ra.... ATT, Verizon and Satellite have worked hard over the past several years so to set themselves apart from the cable companies to boost subscriptions.

    On the other front internet content has grown exponentially over the last few years. With streaming services such as Netflicks, Hulu and Amazon consumers can follow their favorite shows at a fraction of the price of cable. This has led to over half a million households canceling their cable television service this year alone. As more and more content is placed on the web, people may see cable television as a redundant service.

    Lastly I believe the current debate on Net Neutrality could have a significant effect on cable providers. As I mentioned above, most of them have been government sponsored monopolies. I believe this status may soon be called into question, and cable service could be regulated as a common carrier. This could force cable companies to open up their lines to 3rd parties, increasing competition and giving the consumers several choices for cable and internet service.

    While these are only possible scenarios, a combination of them could spell trouble for companies such as Comcast and Time Warner, who haven’t moved fast enough to keep pace with customers demands.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 9:10 PM, FoolTheRest wrote:

    Let's back up here for a moment and consider some of the comments on SIRI above. I am not going to comment on whether the price will shoot up or drop; I will leave that to the SIRI bears and bulls that seem to be so impassioned on TMF site. But let us consider the math behind a 20-bagger from this point. That would give the company a market cap of just under $110 billion, or put into a different perspective, among some of the largest companies in the World (not the largest, but on the same list). Now, let's say a die-hard fan says, "yeah, that could happen, so?" Assuming the P/S ratio stays exactly unchanged, that puts annual revenue at about $55 billion (note that again this is with a "B"). At current subscription price levels, that means about 328 million subscriptions, or just shy of every man, woman, and child in both America and Canada.

    Granted, there are assumptions here about subscription costs and steady ratios, but the point is perspective and to think about what our price targets imply.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 10:12 PM, kcsag wrote:

    I seriously don't understand why SIRI will be so valuable 5-10 years from now. I subscribe to Slacker radio and I have everything I want during my daily commute to work. I can even enjoy it on my work PC if the situation is right. Sure, Slacker/Pandora do not boast loudmouth RJs like Howard Stern et al., but it is not like these jokers provide any real value. Aside from their ability to crack a few stories (which are researched by someone in rural India, mind you), they are completely useless. On the flipside, SIRI does not have a dependable source of Ad revenue and is bleeding money currently. Radio was killed by video which in itself was killed by the internet. It is time to move on.

    If someone has a good bull pitch on SIRI, please let me know how this will get to $20-$30 levels.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2010, at 10:48 PM, BobTheJester wrote:

    The Internet is a Sirius threat!

    --------------------------------------

    I question the long term viability of satellite radio. Streaming Internet audio is superior. Check out Shoutcast: "42,610

    Free Internet Radio Stations." Wow.

    As far as the automobile is concerned, the internet is going mobile. My bet is on the automobile as an Internet hot spot. I went for a ride in a friends car while he was streaming Pandora over a Verizon MiFi. Awesome! My IT associate demonstrated 4GB download speed from his Android phone configured as a hot spot yesterday. With that kind of connectivity I don't need another monthly bill for limited (150 vs 42K?) audio only options.

    Back in the 90's Scott McNealy spoke of the auto as a browsing device. Exactly!

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2010, at 2:50 AM, investchief wrote:

    Sirius is due for a nice run. Now that Howard Stern has gotten back on board with SIRI and it comes standard in many new Chevy and GMC cars, this next year could be a good year for SIRI, keep an eye out.

    check out my investment blog: investchiefblog.com

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cybdiver wrote:

    SIRI is in debt up to it's eyeballs. Cable is going to be gobbled up by internet cable where instead of watching whats served you cherry pick your shows. Entertainment stocks are fickle at best. We had AM Radio, FM Cassette Tapes, Beta max, CD, DVD, Blue Ray now it's all on a hard drive being taken over by cloud computing.

    Buy Fiber Optics and the compaines that lay the lines and service them. Everything is on demand Fiber will be need to supply Wireless devices.

    And anything water, not bottled but supply plants. We get very thirsty especially when the supplies are being exhausted.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1402309, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 4:11:19 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/31/1969 7:00 PM
LCAPA $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Liberty Media Corp… CAPS Rating: ***
LYV $9.39 Down -0.04 -0.42%
Live Nation CAPS Rating: **
SIRI $1.93 Down -0.06 -3.02%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
GE $19.20 Down -0.05 -0.26%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
CMCSA $28.85 Down -0.08 -0.28%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: **
DIS $44.50 Up +0.06 +0.14%
Walt Disney CAPS Rating: *****
DWA $17.85 Up +0.13 +0.73%
DreamWorks Animati… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement