How Risky Is Ebix?

This article is part of our Rising Star Portfolios series.

While risk means many things to many people, Fool co-founder David Gardner defines it as "the chance that your investment outcome will be a substantial loss of capital." In order to help understand the concept, David recently developed a risk rating tool for his Motley Fool Rule Breakers members.

The process is pretty simple and involves answering 25 "yes" or "no" questions. Let's consider Ebix (Nasdaq: EBIX  ) , which was a candidate for my Rising Star multivitamin portfolio. We'll run the insurance software provider through the wringer.

THE COMPANY (five questions)
1. Profitable: Is the company profitable over both the past quarter and past 12 months?
Yes.

2. Flow: Is the company cash-flow positive over both the past quarter and past 12 months?
Yes.

3. Brand: Does the company's business rely on recognizable branding truly valued by its buyer base?
Yes, management even specifically mentions promoting its brand.

4. Diversified: Has the company diversified its buyer base such that no single customer accounts for more than 20% of revenue?
Yes.

5. Raving Fans: Does the company receive, on the whole, positive word of mouth from its customers?
Yes, positive word of mouth, sure. Raving? Not so sure.

FINANCIALS (five questions)
6. Growth: Is the company growing its sales by between 10%-40% annually over the previous three years?
No, 48% annually. Much of this is due to acquisitions.

7. Independence: Can the company operate its business over the next three years without relying on external funding
No, I could have gone either way with this one, but management clearly indicates it's willing to tap the capital markets for more funding in order to satisfy its acquisitive appetite.

8. Disclosure: Does the company report to a high standard of disclosure, consistent with Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines in the U.S.?
No, a prior restatement of earnings, KPMG resigning as auditor, musical auditors, and BDO Seidman expressing concerns about "deficiencies" in Ebix's internal controls mean it doesn't get the benefit of the doubt with me.

9. Transparency: Would an intermediate-level investor find the company's financial statements and management ownership disclosures relatively easy to sift through and understand?
No, the high number of acquisitions make it tough to get a clear picture of the financials and can provide apples-to-oranges comparisons.

10. Well-Managed: Over the most recent fiscal year, did the company report a return on equity of 15% or higher?
Yes.

THE COMPETITION (three questions)
11. Underdog: Is the company free of any direct competitors possessing substantially (two times or more) greater financial resources
No, as stated by management in the 10-K. Two that are named by Ebix are Delphi Financial Group (NYSE: DFG  ) and Computer Sciences (NYSE: CSC  ) .

12. Goliath: Is the company free of any disruptive upstarts visibly challenging its business model?
Yes, none that I can see at this time.

13. Moat: Would potential new competitors face high economic, technological, or regulatory barriers to entry?
Yes, Ebix is benefiting from a network effect and has become the standard in some areas.

THE STOCK (three questions)
14. Market Cap: Does the stock have a market cap of greater than $500 million?
Yes.

15. Beta: Is this stock's beta rating over the past 12 months less than 1.3?
Yes, but just barely, at 1.25.

16. P/E Ratio: Does the stock have a positive price to multiple that is below 30?
Yes, 15.7.

PEOPLE (two questions)
17. Founder: Do any of the founders or founding family still have at least a 5% stake in the company?
No.

18. Experience: Of the top three officers, do they have more than 15 years of combined leadership at the company
Yes, though it's close.

SERVICE-SPECIFIC (two questions) ... here, Rule Breakers
19. Rule Breaker: Does this company meet a majority of our Rule Breaker attributes?
Yes.

20. Binary Destiny: Are the company's future business prospects easily able to withstand the shock of binary outcomes that go against it?
Yes.

FOOLISHNESS (five questions)
21. Immaculate? Is this company certain to be fault-free and fraud-free in all its corporate statements and deeds?
No, this answer is always "no."

22. You: Do I want to know more about this company; am I willing to dig deeper, learn more, ask questions on the boards -- actively understand this company?
Yes.

23. Company question No. 1: Ask and answer the most insightful question you can come up with when assessing this specific company's risk.
Can I trust that management will steer a smart course in its acquisition strategies?
No, I just think too much can go wrong here.

24. Company question No. 2: Ask and answer the second most insightful question you can come up with when assessing this specific company's risk.
Can I trust what I see on the financial statements?
No, after reading John Del Vecchio's assessment of Ebix in our Big Short service, I realize that acquisition accounting makes it tough to calculate a true growth rate and assess cash flow quality.

25. Bulletproof? Can you be certain that this company is invulnerable to external world or macroeconomic events such that you're sure you can get all your capital back?
No.

I count 10 "no" responses, giving this stock moderate risk on the Rule Breakers scale:

Rule Breakers Risk Ratings Scale
High (20-25 points)
Moderately High (15-19 points)
Moderate (10-14 points)
Moderately Low (5-9 points)
Low (0-4 points)

You should try this exercise with every company you own; it makes you think about things from different angles. I promise you'll come away with a greater understanding of the business and its future prospects!

If you're interested in keeping up with Ebix, be sure to add it to your watchlist.

Fool analyst Rex Moore reminds you there's no "team" in "I." He owns no companies listed here. Ebix is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. The Fool owns shares of Ebix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2011, at 2:47 PM, voxraison wrote:

    good piece. nice.

    one question:

    re the qualification by auditors. pls point me to where you saw that and in which year. is that qualilfication current or historic?

    thanks

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2011, at 8:30 PM, TMFOrangeblood wrote:

    voxraison,

    It's historical, but I had to ding them on that question. Another reader commented on another one of my articles:

    "KPMG resigned in June of 2004. BDO's comments were based on the FY ending 2004 and remained in the filings, regarding that period, for the balance of the 2005 filings as required. It appears that a lot of the concern was related to the foreign acquisitions as one might expect.

    There was no subsequent mention of any further, or other, deficiencies made by BDO during the remainder of their time as Ebix's auditors.

    Their current auditors Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P are a top 30 firm and as of the last audited filing dated March 16, 2010 have expressed "an unqualified opinion thereon" regarding the company's internal controls. "

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Mstinterestinman wrote:

    If you look at the risk reward especially after the pullback this company is a screaming buy. Just imo

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1432621, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/30/2014 4:05:03 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 17,077.32 6.10 0.04%
S&P 500 1,975.96 -1.84 -0.09%
NASD 4,502.58 -3.27 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/30/2014 3:49 PM
CSC $61.29 Up +1.67 +2.80%
Computer Sciences… CAPS Rating: ***
DFG.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Delphi Financial G… CAPS Rating: ****
EBIX $14.16 Down -0.06 -0.42%
Ebix CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement