Intel Fumbles at Exactly the Right Time

The last time Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  ) posed any real threat to Intel (Nasdaq: INTC  ) , AMD had an impressive batch of innovation on its hands in the Athlon 64 architecture while Intel was exploring a dead end with the now-defunct and orphaned Pentium 4 series.

Well, here we go again: AMD has just introduced the first few flavors of its long-awaited Fusion architecture, and Intel has messed up its own revolutionary re-creation. Support chips for the Sandy Bridge line of graphics-crunching CPUs turned out to have a serious design flaw that would kill the performance of storage devices over time, and a wholesale recall is in order.

This is the most expensive recall in Intel's history, far ahead of the $475 million write-off for the infamous FDIV bug in the original Pentium. Dell (Nasdaq: DELL  ) is looking into a plan of action, Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) isn't saying much about it, Samsung will repair or replace affected computers, and Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) hasn't introduced any Macs with Sandy Bridge chips inside yet. No big deal for computer makers, I say; Intel foots the bill for any uncomfortable recall situations here. The effect on computer builders will be limited since only a small number of systems have made it all the way to consumers so far, making this more of a delayed launch issue for Intel itself.

The bug will reduce Intel's first-quarter sales by approximately $300 million as the faulty chips are thrown away and replaced with an improved version. The total cost for the whole affair should land around $700 million, and "full volume recovery" isn't expected until April.

The costs are a minor concern for Intel's shareholders, but that delay gives AMD a three-month window of opportunity to do some damage with those Fusion chips. Only problem, thanks to its ouster of CEO Dirk Meyer, is that AMD is a rudderless ship at the moment and ill prepared to take advantage of Intel's slip-up.

Great timing, guys. I hope the CEO search has unearthed some truly remarkable talent and that your candidate can hit the ground running at 110 miles per hour. Intel doesn't serve up a lot of these disruption opportunities on a silver plate, you know.

Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares of AMD but holds no other position in any of the companies discussed here. Intel is a Motley Fool Inside Value choice. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. The Fool has written puts on Apple. The Fool owns shares of and has bought calls on Intel. Motley Fool Options has recommended buying calls on Intel. The Fool owns shares of Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. You can check out Anders' holdings and a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2011, at 2:24 PM, austec wrote:

    BUT INTEL IS STILL THE MASTER MONOPOLIST. The bigger questions:

    1. DOES INTEL STILL HAVE ENOUGH CASH LEFT TO KEEP APPLE FROM TRYING OUT AMD'S NEW PRODUCTS?

    2. ARE AMD'S PRODUCTS CONVINCING ENOUGH TO COMPEL OEM CHIEFS TO BRAVE INTEL'S MONOPOLISTIC WRATH: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Intelcompla...

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2011, at 4:26 PM, roguesisland wrote:

    austec, you must be a paid AMD shill. I see your name plastered all over Intel's Yahoo finance message board. You will never get what you pipe dream about daily. No, not ever.

    2. Hardware manufacturers don't want second rate products in their designs.

    1. btw, Intel doesn't have a cash flow 'problem', but AMD sure does.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2011, at 4:43 PM, kevhead64 wrote:

    Fusion design is the largest threat to Intel ever. Intel scrapped larrabee its own attempt at fusion, Sandy was damage control, Intel brought Sandy to CES even though it knew about this issue. They couldnt face showing uo emptry handed. It was a rushed project to not let AMD ahead and look what happened. Sandy graphics fail in comp to AMD fusion. Sorry folks but Intel is going to take a major hit as it already has with the low end APUs already launched. Llano and bulldozer are ramping up. AMD might have the gorrilla by the nads now

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2011, at 7:39 PM, rav55 wrote:

    If Intel did not choose to go it alone in the Sandy Bridge chipset market then Invidia would have been a good fallback.

    In the past Invidia had always built a better performing chipset than Intel ever did. As well as ATI.

    Hey wouldn't that be a hoot! ATI chipsets running Sandy Bridge! According to the "AGREEMENT" the chipset market should still be available to AMD!

  • Report this Comment On February 02, 2011, at 5:52 AM, TMFZahrim wrote:

    Here, Buyaluminium, take your pick:

    http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&am...

    It's not a paper launch, nor Duke Nukem vaporware.

    Anders

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1433412, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/29/2014 7:26:54 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement