3 Easy Steps to Kick-Start Renewable Energy in the U.S.

For years, the United States has been talking about making a commitment to renewable energy and energy security. And for years the rest of the world has laughed as we've grown more reliant on foreign oil and "unconventional oil" to satisfy our energy needs.

This week, the Obama budget hits bookshelves with an expected increase in alternative energy funding, but I think it's a little off base. As unrest spreads in the Middle East and oil prices continue to rise, it is the right time to give renewable energy a boost. But we need a better path forward.

I'm not a big fan of government grants that rarely pay off or tax schemes that have the unintended consequence of bringing in foreign investors. What we need is a simple plan to increase installations of wind, solar, and other renewable energy sources in the short term until they reach grid parity (which they will) in the next decade. Here are three responsible steps we could take with renewable energy while limiting government involvement and throwing in a few free market twists.

Step 1: Streamline the environmental approval process, limiting approval time to three months. In the first month, a project is presented, and environmental activists can do a quick study on any animal they think needs protection. Projects have been delayed for years with plans turned upside down because of a drawn-out environmental approval process -- that needs to stop. In the second month, activists would make their arguments to a panel of independent experts (I would volunteer, of course), and developers would have a chance to respond. In the third month, a final ruling is handed down. End of story.

Step 2: Utility renewable energy applications: Right now, projects are built with the help of power purchase agreements between utilities and project developers, which are later approved by regulators in a process that should get a free market makeover. If we had utilities apply for a set amount of megawatts of power purchase agreements first and have developers compete on price later (we'll get to price in Step 3), ratepayers would get a better deal.

For example: Southern California Edison, who has multiple solar PPAs, would apply for 300 MW of solar power purchase agreement. Regulators would approve the agreement with a specific timeframe for the project to be completed, then we move to step 3.

Step 3: Implement reverse PPA auctions for power purchase agreements. Developers would bid on the project that utilities are approved for and on a PPA price for projects on a declining cent/kWhr price based on pre-approved specifications. The firm would have to come armed with a pre-approved environmental review and be able to meet the timeframe allotted for the project. This would eliminate huge backlogs that some developers are building, but it would ensure projects are built more quickly and at a competitive price for ratepayers.

We should also use this reverse auction process for federal land projects, which should include land leases and environmental approvals in packages to be auctioned off. Currently, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) and a series of subsidiaries are clogging land applications with projects that are unlikely to be built. Do we really think Goldman is a solar developer? Get the garbage out of the system and approvals would become much easier.

None of these ideas fundamentally changes anything about how solar and wind projects are built; it just makes the process faster and more competitive.

Solar manufacturers would be able to bid on projects through their project development units. First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR  ) and Sunpower (Nasdaq: SPWRA  ) are two of the biggest project developers, but Chinese firms are also getting in on the game. Through a majority-owned stake in Solar Power, LDK Solar (NYSE: LDK  ) is planning to make a big move into large-scale installations in the U.S. and the Americas, so there would be plenty of bidders.

Losing the battle for manufacturing
Making project development easier is the best path for the U.S. to create a viable renewable energy industry. U.S.-based companies are already giving up on manufacturing here, and after Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR  ) closes up shop in Massachusetts, U.S. capacity will be almost gone.

As Chinese firms like solar firms JA Solar (Nasdaq: JASO  ) and Suntech Power (NYSE: STP  ) leverage Chinese lending to build huge amounts of capacity, the U.S. is falling so far back we can't catch up. This doesn't mean we can't become a power in solar and wind power generation. To do that, we need to kick down a few barriers, make the process more competitive, and ensure that projects get built in a timely manner.

What changes would you like to see to make solar, wind, and other renewable sources a bigger part of our energy picture? Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

Interested in reading more about solar stocks? Pick your favorite and add it to My Watchlist to keep up with all of our Foolish analysis on the sector.

Fool contributor Travis Hoium owns shares of First Solar and SunPower. You can follow Travis on Twitter at @FlushDrawFool, check out his personal stock holdings or follow his CAPS picks at TMFFlushDraw.

First Solar is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 17, 2011, at 3:45 PM, bubba99932 wrote:

    The U.S. has consistently shot itself in the foot on RE, especially Solar. The grass-roots PACE programs (Property Assessed Clean Energy) were shot down by the mortgage industry. Few utilities nationwide even allow distributed generation via Photovoltaic (PV): no hookups, no net metering, no Feed-in-Tariffs (FITs). The litany of ineptitude and cross-purposes goes on, but I'll stop right here, lest anyone think I'm just an ol' sorehead.

    Bubs

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Edthefoolish wrote:

    Nicely buttoned up piece, but it just doesn't go far enough. Why would a utility do step 2? (only if forced through an RPS is one answer).

    PPAs aren't the end all be all. Many utilities would only sell power at wholesale rates - $0.05/kWh. You aren't going to build many systems at that rate. Couple net metering with renewable energy certificates.... well... you might have a program.

    Re: GS, it was a major backer of Sunedison. i'm not sure what they are doing now, but they were one step removed from being a solar developer.

    Losing the battle on manufacturing??? It was lost about 7 years ago.... Can it be fixed? Yes... but fixing manufacturing goes well beyond your 3 steps....

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2011, at 5:42 PM, negativecharge wrote:

    I particularly like your observation about the reverse auctions for awarding the PPA contracts. One similar idea I have explored is to use the auction process to match the lowest-cost financing to projects, using a Dutch auction to raise equity or debt for a renewable energy project or basket of projects. Used in concert with a PPA reverse auction, this approach has the potential to lead to markedly lower prices for renewable energy.

    I will be writing a post about this on my website: http://thenegativecharge.com, and I hope you'll let me know what you think.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2011, at 10:49 AM, algaepreneur wrote:

    Major University Admits Hard Science Problems Relating to Algae Have Been Solved

    Arizona State University Senior Vice President Rick Shangraw recenty said "…algae will “deliver soon” because…most of the hard science problems science problems regarding algae have been solved…Now…it’s largely an engineering problem."

    The US taxpayer has spent over $2.5 billion on algae research over the last 50 years and NOTHING has been commercialized to date. We need to investigate what was spent and what were the results. Investigatations have started.

    The REAL question is: Does the DOE really want to get off of foreign oil or do they want to continue funding grants for more algae research to help keep researchers employed at universities for ANOTHER 50 YEARS?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1443677, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2014 12:06:54 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement