HP's "Softer Side" Strategy: Sensible, but Not Enough

What makes a CEO covet a P/E ratio of 14.1 for their stock? Having a P/E ratio of only 10.8. All else being equal, moving a P/E from 10.8 to 14.1 equates to a 31% boost in share price ... no easy feat.

IBM envy
That's the challenge for the new CEO of Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) , which is trading at a 10.8 P/E. Competitor IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) commands a comparatively high 14.1. What does IBM have that HP doesn't? For one thing, IBM's net margin -- net income as a percentage of revenue -- is 14.9%. HP's 7.2% is less than half of that.

What's behind IBM's superior margins? A look at some HP competitors and other major tech companies shows Lexmark (NYSE: LXK  ) and the software players all have higher margins than HP.

Company

EBIT Margin

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) 40.4%
Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) 34.0%
SAP (NYSE: SAP  ) 31.1%
IBM 20.0%
Lexmark 11.7%
HP 10.5%
Dell (Nasdaq: DELL  ) 5.7%

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

You've gotta love those software margins.

The softer side of HP
Although software accounts for only 3% of HP's revenue, last fall the board hired a relatively inexperienced CEO from software provider SAP. What might seem an odd choice may be a case of IBM envy. Over the past several decades, IBM has evolved from a declining hardware company into an enterprise IT leader. The differing revenue and profit contributions from software and hardware at IBM and HP explain a lot.

Last 4Quarters

IBM

HP

Hardware % of Revenue 19% 47%
Hardware % of Profit 8% 30%
Software % of Revenue 25% 3%
Software % of Profit 46% 4%

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.
Profit percentages are author's calculation.

Easier said than done
With software contributing almost half of IBM's profit, it's no surprise HP CEO Leo Apotheker is upfront about wanting to beef up HP's software capabilities. Fortunately, he plans to stay away from applications, an area in which IBM floundered early on (remember the Lotus acquisition?). But what looks good on a PowerPoint is fraught with risks.

First, acquisitions rarely deliver the hoped-for benefits. Furthermore, as a tiny part of HP, even stunning software growth would barely move the needle. Finally, software companies trade at premium multiples that make acquisitions expensive. At some point, a growth-through-acquisitions strategy could drain cash. It's also worth noting that IBM's mainframe operating system -- which HP can't match -- likely drives a significant portion of IBM's software profits.

Foolish takeaway
Beefing up HP's software capabilities makes sense strategically, but is easier said than done. It also isn't enough to right the company. HP needs to correct years of under-investing in R&D, recent missteps in China, and deteriorating quality that has both increased warranty and service costs and tarnished the HP brand. It's going to be a long haul.

More HP Foolishness

Fool contributor Cindy Johnson currently owns shares in Microsoft. An HP customer for 20 years, she has been disappointed recently. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on Microsoft. The Fool owns shares of International Business Machines, Microsoft, and Oracle. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 10, 2011, at 11:45 PM, dallashouston wrote:

    Please keep in mind that HP is where it is NOT as a result of Leo Apotheker's 4 months of introduction but rather Mark Hurd's years of command.

    Wall street & analysts were oh so happy with his actions but now seem to awaken surprised at the results. Hurd's plan was to cut, cut cut everywhere but sales. Engineering suffers, R & D suffers and HP became more and more reliant on ODM partners such as Foxconn, Inventec, Quanta, etc.

    HP ISS recently had the best 4th quarter in it's history. All hardware top lines and bottom lines are growing. HP may increase software projects, but the days of "razor thin" PC margins are gone. HP is making money, but the employees aren't

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1456295, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/22/2014 10:53:07 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement