Careful Buffett-watchers have known for a while that Berkshire Hathaway's
But Berkshire invested anyway, making a bet on the talents of CEO Wang Chuan-Fu, who Charlie Munger called "a combination of Thomas Edison and Jack Welch." And while the value of that investment has risen handsomely, questions about the company have continued to surface.
And now that investment is likely to come under heavy pressure, thanks to WikiLeaks.
WikiLeaks strikes again
The WikiLeaks website has been in the news since it published a trove of formerly secret U.S. diplomatic cables late last year. Among those cables are several from the U.S. consulate in Guangzhou that express serious concerns about BYD's quality and operations. These cables were provided to Reuters, which used them as a starting point for an in-depth report on the company.
That report was published late on Thursday, and it doesn't look good for BYD. Among the problems noted by Reuters:
Copied designs. China's intellectual property laws are famously lax, and the copying of global companies' designs is hardly a problem limited to BYD, or even the auto industry. But even by Chinese standards, some of BYD's moves have been blatant. The company's F3 sedan is awfully similar to a Toyota
(NYSE: TM)model, both visually and mechanically, and according to Reuters, dealers would actually replace the cars' BYD markings with Toyota badges for a modest fee. These are not cars (or business practices) that can be exported without facing hopeless intellectual-property challenges.
- Low quality. BYD's cars are "nowhere near" meeting U.S. or European safety standards, according to an insider interviewed by Reuters. The consulate's report noted that the company often tended to use cut-rate materials to save weight and cost, at the expense of safety. Wang has talked at length about BYD's global ambitions, even setting up offices in the U.S. and Germany, but the products aren't yet ready for prime time.
Battery problems. Building shoddy, copied cars is one thing. Building a good car for a competitive price is hard, but it's not a challenge that is likely to daunt the Chinese auto industry indefinitely. But BYD's real promise, at least from Berkshire's perspective, is its battery technology. BYD's electric E6 sedan, now said to be arriving in the U.S. in 2012 after several delays, is said (by BYD) to charge faster and have a greater range than cars such as General Motors'
(NYSE: GM)Chevy Volt and Nissan's Leaf. Range is the electric-car battleground at the moment, but Reuters notes that there are reasons to think BYD's battery technology isn't performing as advertised, at least not yet.
- Minuscule sales of the cars that matter. In an earlier look at problems at BYD, I noted that the company had sold all of 18 examples of its much-touted F3DM plug-in hybrid in the first half of 2010. That number rose to a whopping 480 by year end, according to Reuters, despite a Chinese government subsidy that covers almost half of the car's purchase price. By contrast, GM has already sold more than 600 Volts in the U.S. this year, and production is still ramping up. The New York Times recently road-tested an F3DM and pronounced it "impressive, though imperfect," but so far, buyers seem to be looking elsewhere.
- Sales in free-fall. BYD's total Chinese-market sales were down 15% in January, despite a nearly 14% year-over-year gain in the overall market. Bad as January's numbers were, the company sold half as many cars in February, despite heavy price cuts midmonth. If BYD can't hold on to its market share at home, is there any reason to believe it can credibly expand into the U.S. or Europe?
Some of this can be written off to growing pains, and some of it is probably part and parcel of the chaotic Chinese market. But taken together, the report raises serious doubt about BYD's ability to become an export power, and that is (or was) the key to the company's hoped-for growth.
Serious reasons for skepticism
Despite BYD's troubles, Berkshire's stake, which was bought for $232 million and valued at $1.18 billion at the end of 2010, is still comfortably in the black. But it's worth noting that Berkshire's 2009 letter valued the stake at just under $2 billion, a near 40% loss in what was otherwise a pretty good year for the markets.
Of course, BYD's awful third-quarter numbers -- in which the company reported a 99% decline in profits -- had a lot to do with that. But things haven't improved much since. BYD's shares have dropped another 15% so far this year, threatening to drive the value of Berkshire's investment under $1 billion.
I think the stock is likely to fall further, and not just because of the Reuters report. The case for BYD as an investment was based on its battery technology, and on its plans to become a global mass-marketer of affordable, viable electric cars. The problem is that the global window of opportunity for new electric-car makers is likely to be a narrow one, assuming consumers buy into the technology, with well-funded newcomers such as Tesla Motors
Is there any chance BYD, with its crude products, iffy technology, and falling-by-the-day credibility, can establish itself as a serious global carmaker before the big guys' technology blows past them?
I don't think it can. I wonder if Warren Buffett still does.
Are you a fan of the Oracle from Omaha? Add Berkshire Hathaway to My Watchlist to follow all of the Fool's coverage of the master's latest moves.