Recs

9

Time for Realtors to Get Real

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Imagine you walk into a Best Buy store and head to the TV section. There, wandering among the big-screens are blue-shirted folks ready to tell you exactly why that 60-inch, 3-D, LED TV is just right for you.

Now how do you view these people? As trusted television experts working on your behalf to make sure you get the right TV at the right price and advisors that will potentially tell you to sit and wait if now's not the right time to buy? Or as Best Buy employees who have the company's and their own bottom lines in mind?

I figure most of us would say the latter.

When it comes to real estate agents, though, that may not be the case. Though the incentives are no less out of whack -- the more the buyer pays for the house, the more the agent makes, and the agent makes bupkis if there's no sale -- homebuyers are much more likely to treat a real estate agent as an expert that is guiding them through the complex process of buying a house.

But, as University of Arizona professor Brent White points out in a new paper, real estate agents aren't viewed by courts as advisors at all, but simply as salespeople. That means that agents are free to say pretty much anything they want to potential buyers and have no fear of legal liability.

While the vast majority of agents may have the best intentions in mind when "guiding" buyers, White argues that in the wake of a housing bust that's left a great number of homeowners so far under water that they might find Jimmy Hoffa, the gap between perception and reality for real estate agents needs to be closed.

Professor White suggests that real estate agents either "fully professionalize their role" -- meaning they become accountable and legally liable -- or accept the role of salesperson and avoid providing advice and guidance to buyers. I think this is a brilliant idea and have come up with a few ideas of how implementation might work.

  • Dress code. To make it simple for buyers to know what kind of agent they're dealing with, agents could be split into the two classes that White outlines and the professionalized agents will wear business suits while the sales group would be forced to wear a getup similar to waiters at Jimmy Buffett's Margaritaville.
  • Taxi service. Since pretty much anyone with an Internet connection can get all the information they need about for-sale properties from the sites of companies like Zip Realty (Nasdaq: ZIPR  ) and Move (Nasdaq: MOVE  ) , agents could become more like a taxi service to simply transport homebuyers from place to place. The National Association of Realtors would become a call center and would keep its trap shut on anything economics related, while chitter-chatter in the real estate taxis would stick to normal taxi topics like lower back pain, why the Yankees suck, and what a jerk the last guy in the car was.
  • Buttons. While with buyers, every real estate agent will have to wear an oversized button that says "I take 6% of whatever you pay and the more you pay, the more I make." Require that they clear their throat and tap the button every time they give anything that can be construed as advice or guidance.

Sure, my ideas might take some getting used to, but it's all about changing the paradigm so that we don't repeat past mistakes, right?

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Best Buy is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Best Buy is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns shares of Best Buy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer does not have a financial interest in any of the companies mentioned. You can check out what Matt is keeping an eye on by visiting his CAPS portfolio, or you can follow Matt on Twitter @KoppTheFool or on his RSS feed. The Fool's disclosure policy prefers dividends over a sharp stick in the eye.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 31, 2011, at 2:02 PM, David369 wrote:

    Way back when the housing bubble burst and the rest of the economy did the death spriral shortly there after, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) during the next year announced that the housing bust was at bottom and would be rising. Then the next year they made roughly the same announcement. Somewhere after that I think they fired their economist, hired a new one and I think he said something like "the housing market is trending up" and of course it hasn't. Maybe they weren't as dumb (to use a nice word) as they seemed. Maybe they thought if they announced the market was improving it would (some how just by them "tricking" everyone or something).

    If the NAR can't even get a simple read on what the housing market is doing (they have tons of data that is provided to them daily) how can we expect local agents to provide reliable advice on local housing markets.

    It could be worst. The Fed gave (our) money to the banks to bail them out and so they could make loans. The banks tightened up on loans (gave out less) and used the money to buy other banks. There was no downside for the banks/lenders. Tons of downside for taxpayers and the general public. I think I would rather trust a real estate agent with my money than the fed. At least I have the ability to choose what agent I use and would be more likely to find an honest one.

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2011, at 10:34 PM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    I would like to point out that used car sales people and realtors have similar compensation arrangements. The higher price the product sells for the more money they make. Having dealt with both, I found the experiences to have been eerily similar.

  • Report this Comment On May 13, 2011, at 8:13 PM, TheChronos wrote:

    Well written. It IS time for a major paradigm shift; many Americans are intelligent enough and savvy enough to do many (perhaps not all) of the tasks a realtor does, thanks largely to the provision of MLS data publicly available on the internet - paying 6% on say, a $200,000 house = $6,000 is ridiculous for what a realtor does.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1467950, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 7:56:18 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 10 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
ZIPR $1.40 Up +0.04 +2.94%
ZIPREALTY, INC. CAPS Rating: ****
MOVE $8.07 Down -0.15 -1.82%
Move, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement