This article is part of our Rising Star portfolio series.
My real-money Rising Star portfolio is designed so you can follow along and achieve a well-rounded, diversified portfolio of your very own. Now that I'm a few recommendations in, I want to step back and assess where we are at this point.
First, here's a look at the stocks I've bought and their performance to date:
|
Company
|
Date Purchased
|
Return
|
|
Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO )
|
Nov. 30, 2010
|
6%
|
|
Coca-Cola
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
2%
|
|
lululemon athletica (Nasdaq: LULU )
|
Jan. 12, 2011
|
23%
|
|
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ )
|
Feb. 28, 2011
|
(2%)
|
|
Abbott Labs (NYSE: ABT )
|
Feb. 28, 2011
|
4%
|
|
lululemon athletica
|
March 24, 2011
|
13%
|
|
II-VI (Nasdaq: IIVI )
|
April 5, 2011
|
(2%)
|
So far, so good. There's no way to draw any meaningful conclusions after just a few months, but getting off to a good start is certainly better than the alternative!
When I started the port, I established the following allocation guidelines:
|
Large caps
|
45%
|
|
Mid caps
|
15%
|
|
Small caps
|
15%
|
|
International
|
25%
|
I won't be too much of a stickler about hitting these percentages, but this is a pretty good guideline for most people. After buying five stocks over seven different purchases, here's how it shakes out so far:
|
Company
|
Market cap (millions)
|
Size
|
Value
|
% of Port
|
|
Coca-Cola
|
$155,200
|
Large
|
$1,080.32
|
28%
|
|
lululemon athletica
|
$6,600
|
Mid
|
$1,283.94
|
33%
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
|
$163,400
|
Large
|
$477.16
|
12%
|
|
Abbott Labs
|
$78,500
|
Large
|
$505.75
|
13%
|
|
II-VI
|
$1,500
|
Small
|
$542.08
|
14%
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
$3,889.25
|
100%
|
So that gives me 53% large-cap exposure, 33% mid-cap, and 14% small-cap. I have exposure to health care, retail, technology, and however you want to define Coca-Cola (sugar water industry?). I really like the way things are shaping up.
It's also pretty easy to see where our next stop should be: international. This is sort of a squirrely category to begin with (to use a technical term). After all, Coke, Johnson & Johnson, II-VI, and Abbott Labs all have more than half their sales overseas. But all my stocks are headquartered in the U.S., and I do want to branch out some more to get some internationally based companies in the mix.
Why? Increasing your exposure to foreign stocks, up to a certain point, both raises your expected returns and lowers your risk. It's what Princeton professor Burton Malkiel calls "the closest thing to a free lunch in our world securities markets." Not buying foreign stocks, says Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel, "is a risky strategy for investors."
In my next article, I'll show you how to construct a screen that will provide us with a great list of international candidates. Until then, feel free to keep up with my tweedlings on Twitter.