Recs

7

Throw This Stock Away

The house rules are simple in this weekly column.

  • I bash a stock that I think is heading lower.
  • I offset the sting by recommending three stocks as portfolio replacements.

Who gets tossed out this week? Come on down, Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO  ) .

The Cisco kid
It's been three years since I recommended dumping shares of Cisco in this column.

Good call. The meandering maker of networking gear has returned a meager 15% during the mother of all tech rallies. In that time, the Nasdaq Composite has soared 99%, and the average gain of the three stocks I singled out as replacements surged 192%.

It's fashionable to beat up on Cisco now, and I realize that. The shares are a sneeze away from a new 52-week low.

CEO John Chambers all but admitted that his company was broken last week, calling for a commitment to focus. The shares rallied temporarily on the public realization before reality gave it a wedgie. Admitting to failure and having a recipe for success are two entirely different things.

Chambers' first step came with this week's partial retreat out of the consumer market. The Flip is now dead, but Cisco's consumer-facing business has always been merely a sliver of the tech giant's overall revenue mix. Cisco will live and die on the strength of its switches, routers, and other networking gear.

The good news is that networking is as important as ever. We live in amazing connected times. Unfortunately, Cisco's no longer the juggernaut it used to be. Nimble, innovative players have nibbled at Cisco's market share, squeezing margins at Cisco along the way. Juniper (Nasdaq: JNPR  ) and Aruba Networks (Nasdaq: ARUN  ) compete with Cisco in different niches, but both companies are growing substantially faster. Cisco packs the cheaper valuation, but you wouldn't pay much for a networking laggard either.

When earnings fell through fiscal 2009, it was easy to pin the blame on the global recession. What's the excuse now? Year-over-year profitability slipped in its latest quarter, and analysts see more of the same in Cisco's next two quarterly reports.

Cisco will never be the undisputed tech champion it used to be. Bulls will argue that Cisco can buy its way out of stagnancy. Its balance sheet is flush with $40.2 billion in greenery, so all it has to do is land a few hits -- and avoid another $590 million Pure Digital mistake -- and it'll be back in business.

Well, it rarely plays out that way. Tech sector consolidation has pushed valuations higher, and Cisco would have to land several winners to move the needle. Besides, it's been a voracious buyer in the past, and look where that left us.

Cisco is a master of connections, but it's time for shareholders to disconnect.

Good news
As I do every week, I don't talk down a stock unless I have three alternatives that I believe will outperform the company getting the heave-ho. Let's go over the three fill-ins.

  • Riverbed Technology (Nasdaq: RVBD  ) : Riverbed's Steelhead products make networks run more efficiently. Is it a hit with enterprises? You bet. Cisco may have posted lower earnings on a mere 6% top-line uptick during its holiday quarter, but Riverbed posted a 47% surge in revenue as adjusted income soared by 73%. Shares popped 12% higher yesterday after Riverbed's preliminary first-quarter results topped expectations.
  • Check Point Software (Nasdaq: CHKP  ) : As one of Cisco's adversaries in network security, it goes without saying that Check Point is growing faster than Cisco. A snail going the wrong way on a moving sidewalk is moving faster than the Cisco kid. Shares of Check Point have more than doubled since being recommended to Motley Fool Rule Breakers newsletter subscribers two years ago, and there's still more room on the upside. Knowing that Cisco will likely try to buy its way out of its languishing, attractively positioned peers, including Check Point in firewall security or Polycom (Nasdaq: PLCM  ) in videoconferencing, are no-brainer acquisition targets.  
  • Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) : Cisco and Apple aren't natural enemies, though it's hard to think of a bigger reason for Cisco's demise on the consumer end. It's not just that Apple began shoving webcams into iPods, Macs, iPhones, and, as of last month, iPads, all but killing the Flip. Apple's FaceTime was introduced last year, just months before Cisco tried to get families to pay up for costly umi hardware and stiff monthly plans to videochat. Cisco never stood a chance! Apple is also the one company with more cash than Cisco. Despite Apple's sizzle, it's now trading for less than 13 times next year's projected earnings.

I was a router rooter during Cisco's heyday, but it's a different game these days. Please take our Motley Poll, then scroll down and leave a comment explaining your reasoning.

Take the Motley Poll

Which of these stocks would you rather own?

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Juniper Networks is a Motley Fool Big Short short-sale pick. Check Point Software Technologies, Polycom, and Riverbed Technology are Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendations. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. Check Point Software Technologies is a Motley Fool Global Gains choice. The Fool has written puts on Apple. The Fool has created a bull call spread position on Cisco Systems. Motley Fool Alpha LLC has opened a short position on Juniper Networks. Motley Fool Options has recommended a bull call spread position on Apple. The Fool owns shares of Apple. Motley Fool Alpha LLC owns shares of Cisco Systems. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz doesn't mind taking out the garbage every so often. He does not own any of the stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2011, at 1:45 PM, bosco115 wrote:

    So let me get this straight. You said SELL the company near a 52 week low (Cisco), and BUY the company near a 52 week high (Apple)? I thought investing was about buying low and selling high. Am I missing something?

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2011, at 3:01 PM, evanlier wrote:

    Throw away?

    I don’t know how much savvy long term investors have earned with their blue chips over the last 5 years.

    The cream of corporate America, most of these famous companies have generated huge (free) cash flow, have developed marvelous products and have served global markets. But their share price is at the same level as 5 years ago: check KO, INTL, GE, MSFT, CSCO a.o.

    The only return you got from it were some dividends, apart from CSCO who forgot to pay out.

    So, where to go then?

    Ed Van Lier

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2011, at 3:09 PM, BradReeseCom wrote:

    Hi Rick,

    It certainly does appear that Cisco CEO John Chambers agrees with you!

    How so you may ask?

    Well, John Chambers has more of his own money invested in his $50 million private jet (for which Cisco shareholders are gladly and directly paying personally to Chambers more than $2 million per year in jet expenses), than he does in direct shareholdings of Cisco stock.

    I mean, what kind of CEO has more of his personal money tied up in his private jet than he does in direct shareholdings of the company he leads that pays the expenses of his jet?

    Sincerely,

    Brad Reese

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2011, at 4:20 PM, ChrisCFP wrote:

    Wow, Rick... Thanks to you and all the other Cisco-naysayers out there, I've been picking up shares of this financially-sound, major blue-chipper for bargain-basement prices. Keep it coming... I love taking advantage of folks whom buy-high and sell-low... Good stuff. You might want to re-assess your investment strategy however, because it goes against almost every long-known investment philosopies of the public stock market era. I totally 'get' the idea of buying stocks that have strong growth and momentum behind them. But I do NOT buy stocks (or anything else) at or near their all-time highs. No thanks. I've beaten the market soundly each year for nearly a decade running now, so I'm going to keep with the buy-low, sell-high mentality. Becasue over the long-term it works... And I don't mean buying 'junk' for low prices. I mean buying high-quality, sound, industry-leading type companies whom are simply down on their luck. And I'd put Cisco squarely in that camp. So, sorry, I'm going to have to disagree whole-heartedly. For those of you whom already own Cisco, I'd stick with the shares. This type of advice should have been followed years ago, not now... Same goes for Apple at this point. I think it's over-hyped and over-priced. There's no way they can keep the same pace they've seen over the past few years. The world's much too competitive, and they really aren't that 'good'. Just had some lucky breaks backed by hard work... Eventually even that must come to an end...

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2011, at 8:42 PM, bghouse wrote:

    My mom used to joke that if you didn't like what one priest said, you can always go down the street to the next church ... Fortunately, the same can be said of the priests at Motley Fool.

    The above advice came to me in the same email with "Don't Fall Into This Boomer Trap" By Dan Caplinger in which he suggests that instead of us oldsters moving money out of stocks into bonds in this market, we might look at stocks like Cisco and Starbucks which "recently started paying dividends but still have some growth prospects to go with the healthy cash flow they generate."

    Phew! Validates my recent purchase of Cisco at these low prices with the prospect of getting some dividends outta the deal.

    Nothing like shopping around for a priest to validate our own findings.

  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2011, at 11:47 AM, 1020chicago wrote:

    I think is Cisco is both a sell and a buy. How you say? I don't like the company as an investment and definitely think they are going in the wrong direction. Juniper, Aruba and others are taking market and margin away from Cisco. Cisco's continual purchase of other companies makes it more of a tech based conglomerate with products that have no relation or integration to each other.

    In my mind Cisco is dead money. Cisco needs to do two things:

    1. Drop all of their consumer products because they hurt margins and detract from the main business Enterprise Networking. The new Nexis product, developed in-house is a winner. It addresses a major change - convergence of servers and networking into a virtual architecture.

    2. Chambers time is up. He has been a strategic force for Cisco for many years. He should retire to Chairman and bring in new blood that sees the company as a less than optimally deployed asset. Bring core enterprise focus back to the company and expand in areas that have huge growth and margin potential.

    Without #2 Cisco will continue to be dead money in a limited and unprofitable range except for traders. Until both the above happen the market and the major players in the market will not deem Cisco a worthy investment.

    As for the reason Cisco is a buy. The company is a cash rich asset that overtime will find its way in the market. Cisco still generates huge amounts of cash. This is like manna from heaven. Consequently, Cisco is selling about 50% above its 5 year low. Much like Microsoft Cisco is not going out of business, will continue to generate cash and grow its business slightly. For the very long term holder who is extremely patient there is money to be made in Cisco if you want to buy and stick it in a drawer for 5 years.

    I prefer the sell now approach and will review Cisco as an investment if and when it's board takes the appropriate changes necessary for the next level of evolution of this underused asset.

  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2011, at 12:21 PM, buffalonate wrote:

    The best advice is to stay away from large companies all together. The larger the company the slower the growth. Unless you are over 55 their is zero reason to own these huge companies unless you are a DRIP investor.

  • Report this Comment On April 16, 2011, at 11:18 PM, lowmaple wrote:

    Own both stocks. Chambers WILL get booted someday and cisco will rise from it's lows. As others have said they'll get there grove on(with a CEOthat cares about the company more than himself).

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1475480, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 3:48:35 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
CSCO $16.33 Down -0.06 -0.37%
Cisco Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: *****
RVBD $16.52 Up +1.00 +6.44%
Riverbed Technolog… CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
CHKP $52.26 Down -0.04 -0.08%
Check Point Softwa… CAPS Rating: ****
PLCM $10.79 Up +0.02 +0.19%
Polycom CAPS Rating: ***
ARUN $13.70 Down -0.18 -1.30%
Aruba Networks, In… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement