The Bearish Case for BioTime

Sid Haksar manages a concentrated, value-oriented investment partnership inspired by the 1950s Buffett partnerships. The below investment thesis was originally posted on SumZero, the leading community for hedge fund and mutual fund investment analysts where professional investors share investment ideas exclusively with one another. Through The Motley Fool, select content from SumZero is now available to individual investors.

Let me a pose a question to you: How much would you pay for a company that has lost money every year for more than two decades, generates sales in the range of $1 million to $2 million a year, and has a negligible R&D budget crucial to its longevity? The market has put a firm value of around $310 million, and the share price has increased more than 30 times since 2006.

Company overview
BioTime (AMEX: BTX  ) is a biotechnology company engaged in two areas of biomedical research and product development: 

  1. Stem cell technology and products for use in regenerative medicine (more on this below). 
  2. Blood plasma volume expander and related technology for use in surgery and trauma treatment.

BioTime's only revenue generator is Hextend, a blood plasma expander that is used in the treatment of hypovolemia, a condition caused by low blood volume, often from blood loss during surgery or injury.

Hextend is manufactured and distributed in the United States by Hospira (NYSE: HSP  ) and in South Korea by CJ CheilJedang, under license from BioTime. Summit Pharmaceuticals has a license to develop Hextend in Japan, China, and Taiwan. The percentage of revenue generated by Hospira, CJ CheilJedang, and Summit Pharmaceuticals was 68%, 20%, and 12% as of FY 2010.

The primary customer for Hextend remains the U.S. armed forces.

BioTime has claimed in the past that Hextend has a $750 million addressable market. Asensio & Company put out a very comprehensive research report in 1998 (see the PDF version) that put the market size at $30 million and declining at the very best. Further, Asensio & Company highlighted that it was highly unlikely that Hextend would be able to make any major inroads into the market, given a product that did not have any clear demonstrable advantages relative to other similar products.

The fact that Hextend has contributed only $1 million to $2 million to the top line of BioTime over the past several years is a case in point and talks to the self-promotional nature of the company.

BioTime also has a product in phase 2 trials called PentaLyte. The company has been trying --albeit unsuccessfully -- since late 2007 to sign up partners in both the United States and abroad for the opportunity to license and commercialize PentaLyte.

Background to stock appreciation
So what has taken the stock price from $0.30 to its current price around $7, a 24-fold move in a little more than three years?

The answer to this question lies with the hiring of Dr. Michael West as CEO, and the change in the positioning of BioTime as a stem-cell-research-focused operation. An initial founder of Geron, Dr. West joined BioTime in 2007 after having served on the board of the company since 2003. He is touted by the media as one of the fathers of stem cell research, having carried out significant research on the subject in addition to authoring a book, The Immortal Cell: One Scientist's Quest to Solve the Mystery of Human Aging. Before joining BioTime, Dr. West was president and chief scientific officer of Advanced Cell Technology from 2004 through 2007.

What is worth noting is that under Dr. West's watch at Advanced Cell Technology, the stock price went from a high of $7.00 to a low of $0.30 by the time he left, a massive destruction of value based in large part by continued missteps and investor disappointments.

Since Dr. West's arrival, BioTime has been aggressively pushing regenerative medicine as its major growth engine. Regenerative medicine refers to therapies that are based on human embryonic stem ("hES") cell technology and designed to rebuild cell and tissue function lost to degenerative disease or injury.

Upon joining BioTime, Dr. West entered into a license agreement with Advanced Cell Technology, whereby BioTime acquired the worldwide rights to use Advanced Cell Technology's core technology that supposedly turns skin cells into stem cells. Thus, since 2007 through the present, BioTime's primary focus has been on stem cell research.

BioTime is using a strategy whereby it is focusing on the development and sale of advanced human stem cell products and technologies that can be used by researchers at universities and at companies in the bioscience and biopharmaceutical industries. The rationale is that by providing products and technologies that will be used by researchers and drug developers at larger institutions and corporations, BioTime will be able to commercialize products more quickly and inexpensively than would be possible with the development of therapeutic products alone. However, to date, no revenue has been generated through this channel, and the magnitude of future revenue remains unknown.

Stock promotion/hype in overdrive
BioTime's stock surged (up 28% on the day on massive volume) in March of last year upon the presentation by Dr. West and others of an article in Regenerative Medicine (see a copy of the article) highlighting the potential reversal of the aging process of human cells. To give a sense for the promotional nature of this management team, the company, in dramatic fashion, halted trading in its stock for nearly the entire day before the release of the article.

What was omitted was that Dr. Robert Lanza is an editor of the publication and Dr. West is on the editorial board. Furthermore, Dr. Lanza is employed at Advanced Cell Technologies, Dr. West's previous employer. To call this "peer reviewed" without disclosing as such in the press release seems a bit sketchy to me. (See the publication's editorial board.)

Over the next several months, the stock traded down, losing all of its gains and then some before the next bit of the promotion kicked in to keep the momentum going. Enter Patrick Cox, a writer of the Breakthrough Technology Alert, a newsletter from the stable of Agora Financial. Cox has been the biggest promoter of BioTime, having initiated coverage in May of 2008.

This past Nov. 10, Cox put out a report titled "BioTime Cracks the DNA Cell Command Code" that was picked up by Business Insider. The report extolled the virtues of the company and its technology. The stock moved up 12% the day after the report was published and reached a 52-week high of $9.94 on Dec. 28. 

Then again, on March 2, the promotion machine kicked in. This time, John Mauldin, a frequent commentator on the financial markets, put out a piece of research written by Cox on his website titled "Want a New Cardiovascular System?" Upon the publishing of this report, BioTime's stock jumped up 14% on the day amid heavy volume rising from $6.81 to $7.75. 

Valuation
To put BioTime's current valuation in perspective, let us examine Geron, which is arguably considered to be the leader in stem-cell research. Geron has an enterprise valuation of about $445 million. Furthermore, Geron has three products that are currently in phase 2 trials and one product in partnership with Merck that is currently in phase 1 trials. More importantly, Geron's R&D budget dwarfs BioTime's R&D budget by the order of approximately 9. Also, Geron has 175 employees, with 53 holding Ph.D. degrees and another 41 holding advanced degrees.

On the other hand, BioTime currently sports an enterprise valuation of $310 million; apart from PentaLyte (a blood plasma volume expander product in phase 2 Trials), it has no products in phase 1 trials, a paltry R&D budget, and 31 employees, of which 12 held Ph.D. degrees.

In spite of this differential, BioTime today is valued at approximately 70% of Geron's enterprise valuation.

Bottom line
I believe that the current valuation of BioTime is completely unjustified and has been driven in great part by both a promotional management team as well as a highly promotional penny-stock newsletter. The hype surrounding the stock will continue in the near term, and I do expect Cox to issue an update soon enough, which will provide yet another opportunity to short the company.

With an insignificant R&D budget, lack of a near-term therapeutic pipeline, and continued cash burn, I expect another repeat of the Advanced Cell Technology saga to play out at BioTime. Though rooting for the company to find the key to eternal youth, I don't see that happening, at least in my lifetime!

P.S. Note that approximately 23% of the float is currently shorted, so size positions accordingly.

To learn more about SumZero and access additional investment ideas from hedge fund managers/analysts, visit SumZero. See SumZero's legal disclosure policy.

SumZero.com, Sid Haksar, his firm, and its affiliates are not subject to The Motley Fool's trading rules. The author and/or the author's fund may have a position in this security and trade in and out of the position at any time.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (7) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2011, at 12:45 AM, biotimeasia wrote:

    Article is a total hatchet job. No mention of acquiring paradigm changing science from Dr. Erkki Ruoslahti of the Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute. No mention of the 8 subsidiaries formed over the last 3 years that are squarely positioned to take in massive revenue once the medical industry starts to make full use of stem cell technology. Shame on Sid Haksar, he is quite the opposite of siddhartha! Dr. West CEO of BTX is working to save lives and cure diseases, while people like Sid bash senselessly.....SHAME ON YOU!

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2011, at 8:02 AM, swapsan wrote:

    Most stem cell companies at this point are highly speculative stocks, years away from commercialization. Invariable they end up as penny stocks for the present. Most investors who buy in such stokcs know the risks, and treat it like mad money where if they get it right at some point it will be a huge home run.

    May be the above write up has merit, I am in no position to judge. But the space will be more useful if it is spent critiquing the science or technology the company has, rather than the promotional nature of its promoters. That data point will be more useful to investors. I believe they have no phase 1 trials as they have intentionally chosen to avoid the expensive FDA approval route.

    If they indeed have the technology which can revolutionize cure for some diseases, there is no harm in all the promotion or marketing. But deep down if they know this will go nowhere, yes it is a scam.

  • Report this Comment On May 09, 2011, at 8:39 AM, mlcamera wrote:

    What a joke, after that move down you can bet your bottom dollar that this article was a plant for some hedge fund that wants in...so they can buy into the panic. You notice the article was conveniently released after the stock had been smoked. I'll bet you anything it is back at 8 in a week.

    Nicely done guys...whoever panic sold on Friday morning sold to me. Thanks for the discount!

  • Report this Comment On May 09, 2011, at 3:37 PM, AKeating84 wrote:

    I am an employee at Agora Financial, publisher of Patrick Cox’s Breakthrough Technology Alert. I would just like to clarify that Agora Financial expressly forbids our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers.

  • Report this Comment On May 09, 2011, at 4:08 PM, mlcamera wrote:

    Funny...and the Fed is espressly forbidden to buy "risky securities".

    We know how the game works. Hide behind legalese while robbing the public blind.

  • Report this Comment On May 10, 2011, at 6:59 PM, nojoek3 wrote:

    The Motley Fools have many subscribers that have tried their services and understand that they might be (really) real life Fools. Idiots they might say. I have heard other words that were a description of somebody without principle. I had their service for a year and didn't make anything ($) on their picks. I think they like to make judgments according to how they can screw someone / anyone. Buyer beware Motley Fool is a service with probably no real research. I don't think they have integrity. Have you ever met someone you couldn't respect? Motley Fool falls into that category for probably many thousands of one time subscribers. Just a service where the Fools are making a lot of money off people like you and me. Making information available that isn't really true. That's misinformation but from what I understand they have the right (at least right now) to NOT state the whole truth and in doing so put pressure on companies that may have become vulnerable to a gang short. Did someone say rape? That is where more services like the Motley Fools come in. They write up some pretty fowl misinformation and that way when the stock goes down they all can say their pick was a certain percentage winner being on the short side. People that do this are what is wrong with the process of free enterprise. Buyer beware of what you are participating in. Call it Karma or the Law of Reciprocity. Kind for kind, you get what you give or you receive what you sow. These guys will eventually pay for their deeds just like us all.

  • Report this Comment On October 04, 2011, at 3:58 AM, webmind wrote:

    Great article.

    Hey nojoek3, take a chill pill. The fool does some excellent research, and some of their newsletters are top performers.

    And clever guy mlcamera, those fools who sold you their shares of BTX must be feeling pretty stupid now that the stock is down 50%. How is that big discount feeling now? File for bankruptcy yet? It takes more than smart aleck yacking on message boards to be a good investor.

    In fact I took a trial of Patrick Cox's Breakthrough Technology Alert and it was George Gilder deja vu all over again. Clever guy mlcamera, one of Cox's picks, MR**, is trading at a nice discount of 90% from his recommended purchase price. Maybe you want to jump on that.

    The guy may be a technological genius, but that doesn't make him a good stock investor. Gilder's newsletter failed by promoting NEXT generation technology, which is exactly what Cox does. Cox's current portfolio is down about 75%. His subscribers will also be bankrupt soon. And just think, all that performance for a mere $700 a year! You have to try awfully hard to be that bad. Like I said, Cox is a genius . . . for getting fools to subscribe to his newsletter.

    Cox and Gilder may be geniuses, so why do you think they call it the Motley Fool? It doesn't take a genius to get rich, just a little common sense and a lot of discipline. Even Buffett said if you can't explain it to a child, don't buy it. He is humble.

    Blowhards and hotheads are a sure sign of bad investors.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1489782, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/16/2014 7:30:03 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement