It's Too Soon to Flee Peru

Even for a nation well-accustomed to periodic bouts of political chaos and economic disruption, Peru's recent eruption into a hotbed of uncertainty for investors is noteworthy for its scale and complexity.

In a crucial run-off election between two similarly controversial presidential candidates over the weekend, the more left-leaning Ollanta Humala has eked a narrow victory. Peruvian markets stood in nervous vigil in the weeks leading up to the election, and trading on the Lima stock exchange was suspended Monday morning following a swift 8.7% fall. The iShares MSCI All Peru Capped Index Fund (NYSE: EPU  ) -- the only ETF security that exclusively targets the Andean nation -- is down more than 13% at the time of this writing.

But many observers may be jumping to premature conclusions about the likely implications of a Humala presidency in Peru, and therefore overlooking the candidate's revised populist platform, which is noticeably more centrist than the admittedly nationalistic rhetoric that characterized his previous election bid in 2006. After all, he is not explicitly proposing to nationalize mines, as some of his critics fear he may; instead, he's advocated a windfall mining tax on the profits of mining operations in Peru, a position his opponent also supported.

Speaking of Humala's opponent, I am personally unconvinced that Keiko Fujimori represented a superior choice for the country. She is the daughter of former president Alberto Fujimori, who is now serving a 25-year jail sentence stemming from grave human rights violations, embezzlement, bribery, and other charges. I lived in neighboring Ecuador during the elder Fujimori's administration, and I think a clean break from that past works in Peru's best interest.

But in the wake of Humala's victory, the markets have already cast their vote of no confidence in the impending Humala administration. Major miner Southern Copper (NYSE: SCCO  ) dropped more than 10% during Monday's session, while gold and silver producer Buenaventura (NYSE: BVN  ) plunged more than 14% intraday. I view those two stocks in particular as screaming opportunities for Fools who share my expectation that Humala will pursue a more moderate brand of populism than the mining industry presently fears. I have added both stocks to my silverminer CAPS portfolio to reflect my belief that the markets have overreacted to the election result. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold (NYSE: FCX  ) is trading flat on the session, with the market seeming to overlook the popular miner's exposure by way of the 53.56%-owned Cerro Verde copper and molybdenum mine.

A bark that's often worse than its bite
To keep all this in proper context, I remind Fools that not so long ago, investors with exposure to mining operations in Australia were fleeing in panic as proposals for a 40% windfall profit tax were tabled down under. Major miners BHP Billiton (NYSE: BHP  ) , Rio Tinto (NYSE: RIO  ) , and others then lobbied the administration aggressively, and a more moderate resource tax is now set for implementation. There are no indications that future mining investment will crater as a result. Furthermore, as I expressed last year, "I see logic in the notion that the non-renewable resources of any nation are held in trust for the common good of the citizenry".

More recently, Bolivian president Evo Morales spooked investors in Pan American Silver (Nasdaq: PAAS  ) and other foreign miners when he threatened to nationalize several mining operations, but those frightful headlines have since given way to assurances from Bolivia's mining ministry that a revised mining law will not "substantially" alter contract conditions, but rather is more likely to require miners to "pay a little more in royalties because metals prices have risen." I may not be rushing out to increase my investment exposure to miners operating in Bolivia, but I am considering dipping back into Pan American after fleeing from those initial headlines.

I do not mean to suggest that murmurs of nationalization or excessively onerous mining windfall taxes do not collectively pose a threat to investors with exposure to the sector. To the contrary, I view the careful selection of mining jurisdictions where such actions are less likely as a crucial means of reducing risk within an investor's resource-sector allocation. Venezuela, for example, boasts some alluring mineral treasures, but I personally will not touch them after being burned years ago by leader Hugo Chavez's nationalization of the Las Cristinas gold mine. I continue to attempt to concentrate my mining-industry exposures within ultra-safe jurisdictions like Canada, but that doesn't mean I'll be joining the mob in this abrupt exodus from Peru.

Fool contributor Christopher Barker can be found blogging actively and acting Foolishly within the CAPS community under the username TMFSinchiruna. He tweets. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (17)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 06, 2011, at 4:59 PM, johnw2k wrote:

    With a 50-50 split I don't see either of these candidates as a major game changer either.

    My thoughts were that a win for the more conservative and likely more corrupt candidate would just exacerbate problems with the Miner's Unions which delayed their planned strike until after the elections. They seemed to be gaining clout in the last few actions along with those voicing environmental concerns about opening new mines

    Humala will likely be more soothing to the Unions and perhaps more conducive to long term social stability. If he does indeed follow a centrist path this will be good for investors in the near term and peace with the Unions and a happier populace will certainly favor long term prospects.

    I was actually expecting a drop either way the election went considering the looming Union troubles. I was looking for a $32 entry point for Southern Copper and was rewarded today with something better. I can’t see Humala killing off his Golden (or Copper actually) Goose.

  • Report this Comment On June 06, 2011, at 7:19 PM, rfaramir wrote:

    If private property rights were strongly supported (instead of socialism and the tragedy of the commons), pollution would be solved by simply disallowing them from dumping their waste on other people's property. No Gaia eco-religion, union-thuggery, or communists required.

  • Report this Comment On June 10, 2011, at 7:16 AM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    Last year in Sept., the dividend % was 4.6% with a 19.74 PE

    EPS: $1.62

    Now:

    Interest Coverage: 15.1%

    EPS Payout ratio: 94.3% Why so high? Temporary concern?

    FCF Payout ratio: 93.3% Why so high? Temporary concern?

    16.5 P/E

    7% Dividend

    EPS: $1.94

    (From Yahoo)

    I believe the proposed Peru government windfall taxes should not put their prices at a competitive disadvantage.

    I’ve been watching this stock for years. The time to buy may be drawing close.

    Any insight on why the Payout Ratios above are so high?

    Thanks,

    Sky Pilot

  • Report this Comment On June 10, 2011, at 5:33 PM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    Above, I am referring to Southern Copper (SCCO)

    Sky Pilot

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2011, at 9:15 AM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230447480457637...

    · JUNE 11, 2011

    Peru's Election of Leftist to Aid Chávez, for a Bit

    From the Wall Street Journal

    “Despite Mr. Humala's victory, however, Mr. Chávez's clout is unlikely to enjoy more than a temporary lift, analysts say. Beset by mounting economic problems at home, Mr. Chávez's influence has waned recently with the rise of Brazil, a more moderate leftist country enjoying an economic boom.

    In fact, Mr. Humala won the election precisely on the promise that he would not try to emulate Mr. Chávez, consciously opting instead for the moderate economic model offered by Brazil's former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

    On Friday, during a stop in Brazil, his first foreign visit as president-elect, Mr. Humala described himself as a populist, but said he would use Brazil as a guide on how to use export-led growth to fund social-welfare programs. "The Peruvian economy is very solid, and we need to go to the next level with social inclusion, and we want to use Brazil as an example," he said. “

    Sinch if, you want me to post the entire piece for those without a subscription, just let me know, here. I’ll check back later.

    Sky Pilot

    Official Web Link Assistant to Sinch

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1503656, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/16/2014 4:22:21 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement